The voluminous tax competition literature suggests that increased economic integration leads to reduced tax rates and suboptimal levels of government spending as countries compete for mobile factors of production. Integration may influence not only the size of the government but also the structure of public spending. Comprehensive studies analyzing the effect of integration on the overall structure of government spending are rare, however. This article fills this void by providing an empirical analysis of the effects of economic integration on the overall structure of public spending in a number of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries using panel data on the different government spending components for the period 1970 to 2002. The authors find that integration negatively influences government consumption and investment but that there is no empirical evidence that transfers are positively or negatively affected by integration, as suggested by the compensation and efficiency views, respectively.
Adserà, A., & Boix, C. (2002). Trade, democracy and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization , 56, 229-262.
2.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic division. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243-1284.
3.
Armingeon, K., Leimgruber, P., Beyeler, M., & Menegale, S. (2004). Comparative political data set 1960-2002. Berne, Switzerland: University of Berne, Institute of Political Science.
4.
Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 102-125.
5.
Böheim, R., & Mayr, K. (2005). Immigration and public spending (IZA Discussion Paper 1834). Bonn, Germany: IZA .
6.
Castles, F. (2001). On the political economy of recent public sector development. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(3), 195-211.
7.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Dreher, A. (2006). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179-201.
9.
Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (1997). International risk and social insurance: Reassessing the globalization-welfare state nexus. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
10.
Hicks, A., & Swank, D. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960-1982. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 658-674.
11.
Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology , 99(3), 711-749.
12.
Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J., Brady, D., & Beckfield, J. (2004). Comparative welfare states data set. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, University of North Carolina, Duke University, and Indiana University.
13.
Keen, M., & Marchand, M. (1997). Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending . Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33-53.
14.
Lejour, A. (1995). Social insurance and the completion of the internal market (Discussion Paper 61). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
15.
Liberati, P. (2006). Trade openness, financial openness and government size. Unpublished manuscript, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo,"Urbino, Italy.
16.
Navarro, V., Schmitt, J., & Astudillo, J. (2004). Is globalization undermining the welfare state ? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(1), 133-152.
17.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1999). The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review , 43, 699-735.
18.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2004). Constitutional rules and fiscal policy outcomes . American Economic Review, 94(1), 25-44.
19.
Quinn, D. (1997). The correlates of change in international financial regulation. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 531-551.
20.
Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Swagel, P. (2002). Tax burden and migration: A political economy theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 167-190.
21.
Redoano, M. (2004). Fiscal interaction among European countries. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
22.
Rodrik, D. (1997). Trade, social insurance, and the limits to globalization (NBER Working Paper 6905). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments ? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997-1032.
24.
Sanz, I., & Velázquez, F. (2004). The evolution and convergence of government expenditures composition in OECD countries. Public Choice, 119, 61-72.
25.
Schulze, G.G., & Ursprung, H.W. (1999). Globalization of the economy and the nation state. World Economy, 22, 295-352.
26.
Skidmore, M., Toya, H., & Merriman, D. (2004). Convergence in government spending: Theory and cross-country evidence. Kyklos, 57(4), 587-620.
27.
Swank, D. (1997). Global markets, democratic institutions, and the public economy in advanced industrial societies. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University.
28.
Tanzi, V. (2002). Globalization and the future of social protection . Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 9, 116-127.
29.
Tavits, M. (2004). The size of government in majoritarian and consensus democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 340-359.
30.
Wildasin, D. (1988). Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition . Journal of Public Economics, 35, 229-240.
31.
Zodrow, G., & Mierszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.
