In Bed with the Enemy: Some Ideas on the Connections between Neoliberalism and the Welfare State

Abstract

The UK, the US and Australia today embody a type of governmentality which includes a strong element of anti-welfare rhetoric. However, these rationalities have retained - though modified - many elements of a welfare state. What purpose is served by this apparent paradox? It is possible to argue that the welfare state is a necessary precondition for the continued health of the globalized capitalist economies in these nations. This article explores these connections on a general level and makes some tentative suggestions on the functional significance of the current arrangements. In particular it is argued that in Australia the dual labour market is upheld by income support payments. The discourse of anti-welfarism legitimizes an increased level of control over income support recipients’ lives while simultaneously ensuring that expectations regarding citizen entitlements will be dampened - in short, this configuration of discourse and practices facilitates the process of constructing ‘docile bodies’.

Keywords

Australia dual labour market globalized capitalist economies governmentality neoliberalism United Kingdom United States welfare state

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ABBOTT, T. (2001) Four Corners, Australian Broadcasting Commission (ABC) Television , 9 July.

ABS (AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS) (1999) Casual Employment (July 1999). ABS Catalogue No. 6203.0; at: www.abs.gov.au/asustats/ (accessed 28 June 2002).

ALBO, G. (2002) ‘Neoliberalism, the State, and the Left: A Canadian Perspective’ , Monthly Review 54(1): 46-55 .

BAUMAN, Z. (1998) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .

BEESON, M. and FIRTH, A. (1998) ‘Neoliberalism as a Political Rationality; Australian Public Policy since the 1980s’ , Journal of Sociology 34(3): 215-231 .

BLOCK, F. and SOMERS, M. (2003) ‘In the Shadow of Speenhamland: Social Policy and the Old Poor Law’ , Politics and Society 3(1): 283-323 .

BURGESS, J. and CAMPBELL, I. (1998) ‘The Nature and Dimensions of Precarious Employment in Australia’ , Labour and Industry 8(3): 5-17 ; at: Expanded Academic ASAP (accessed 25 June 2002).

BYRNE, D. (2003) ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’ , Work, Employment and Society 17(1): 197-205 .

‘CAUGHT IN THE CRACKDOWN’: 7:30 REPORT (2001) ABC Television , 13 August.

10.

CHAMBRE, S. M. (2003) ‘Reinventing Charity in the Welfare State’ , Social Service Review 77(3): 468-474 .

11.

COMMONWEALTH BUDGET 2002-03 (2002) ‘Next Steps in Welfare Reform: Recognising and Improving the Capacity of People with Disabilities’; at: www.budget.gov.au/2002-03/budget_overview/html/overview-012.html (accessed 1 June 2002).

12.

DEAN, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage .

13.

ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press .

14.

FOUCAULT, M. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmonds-worth: Allen Lane, Penguin .

15.

FOUCAULT, M. (1982) ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp. 208-226. Brighton: Harvester Press .

16.

FOUCAULT, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchel , C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87-104. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .

17.

GAMBLE, A. (2001) ‘Neo-Liberalism’ , Capital and Class 75 (Autumn); at: Proquest, Social Science Plus (accessed 17 June 2002).

18.

GANS, H. J. (1994) ‘Positive Functions of the Undeserving Poor: Uses of the Under-class in America’ , Politics and Society 22(3): 269-283 .

19.

GLEESON, B. and LOW, N. (1999-2000) ‘Annus Horribilis for Neoliberals’ , Arena 14: 9-26 .

20.

GOODIN, R. E. , HEADEY, B. , MUFFELS, R. and DIRVEN, H. (1999) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

21.

HARRIS, P. (2001) ‘From Relief to Mutual Obligation: Welfare Rationalities and Unemployment in 20th-Century Australia’ , Journal of Sociology 37(1): 5-26 .

22.

HARTMAN, Y. (2002) ‘Precarious Stability: Jobless Families in the New Millennium’ , Journal of Economic and Social Policy 7(1): 83-98 .

23.

HARTMAN, Y. , JENNINGS, L. and GILMOUR, J. (2000) ‘ “ Hi, I’m Joe and I am a Mutual Participant in Society”: The Rise of Compulsory Voluntarism’ , paper presented at TASA Conference, Flinders University, Adelaide, 6-8 December.

24.

HENMAN, P. (2002) ‘Deconstructing Welfare Dependency: The Case for Australian Welfare Reform’ , Radical Statistics 79 (Winter); at: www.radstats.org.uk/no079/henman.htm

25.

JACKSON, A. (2002) Canada Beats USA - But Loses Gold to Sweden: Twenty-Five Key Indicators of Social Development; at: www.ccsd.ca/pubs/2002/olympic/indicators.htm (accessed 6 December 2003).

26.

KEWLEY, T. H. (1973) Social Security in Australia 1900-72, 2nd edn. Sydney: Sydney University Press .

27.

KINNEAR, P. (2000) ‘What’s Wrong with Mutual Obligation?’ , Impact October: 8-9 .

28.

LANDT, J. and PECH, J. (2000) ‘Work and Welfare in Australia: The Changing Role of Income Support’ , paper presented at AIFS Conference, Sydney, 24-6 July.

29.

LOWE, R. (1999) The Welfare State in Britain Since 1945, 2nd edn; at: www.stetson.edu/%7Egmaris/Lowewel.htm (accessed 21 November 2003).

30.

MCCHESNEY, R. W. (1999) ‘Noam Chomsky and the Struggle Against Neoliberalism’ , Monthly Review April; at: www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/econ/chmsky99.htm (accessed 16 June 2002).

31.

OFFE, C. (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

32.

OFFICE FOR NATIONAL STATISTICS (2003) Unemployment Rate Remains Unchanged at 5.0%; at: www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=12&Pos=5ColRank=2&Rank=672 (accessed 6 December 2003).

33.

PEARCE, D. , DISNEY, J. and RIDOUT, H. (2002) Report of the Independent Review of Breaches and Penalties in the Social Security System; at: www.breachreview.org/ (accessed 14 March 2002) (copies available from Social Justice Project, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Kensington ).

34.

PERRATON, J. (2000) ‘The Consequences of Globalization and Corporate Structures for Projects of Social Inclusion’, in P. Askonas and A. Stewart (eds) Social Inclusion: Possibilities and Tensions, pp. 123-139. Houndmills: Palgrave .

35.

PIERSON, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

36.

PIERSON, P. (1996) ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’ , World Politics 48(2): 143-179 .

37.

PIVEN, F. F. and CLOWARD, R. (1971) Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon Books .

38.

REFERENCE GROUP ON WELFARE REFORM (2000a) Participation Support for a More Equitable Society: Final Report, July. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services .

39.

REFERENCE GROUP ON WELFARE REFORM (2000b) Participation Support for a More Equitable Society: Interim Report, March. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Family and Community Services .

40.

ROSE, N. (1993) ‘Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism’ , Economy and Society 22(3): 283-299 .

41.

ROSE, N. and MILLER, P. (1992) ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’ , British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173-205 .

42.

SMART, B. (1985) Michel Foucault. London: Routledge .

43.

‘VANSTONE’S “NEW CHASE” ’ (2002) Guardian 1077; at: www.cpa.org.au/garchve5/1077van.html (accessed September 2004).

44.

WALKER, R. and WISEMAN, M. (2003) ‘Making Welfare Work: UK Activation Policies under New Labour’ , International Social Security Review 56(1): 3-29 .

45.

‘WHILE THE RICH GET RICHER, ARE THE POOR GETTING POORER?’: 7:30 REPORT (2002) ABC Television , 16 January.

46.

WINTER, A. (2000) ‘The “New” Right: Definition, Identification, Differentiation’ , Sociological Research Online 5(1); at: www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/winter.html (accessed 17 June 2002).