In this study, the authors extend the standard item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty (MIRID) to fit polytomous items using cumulative logits and adjacent-category logits. Moreover, the new model incorporates discrimination parameters and is rooted in a multilevel framework. It is a nonlinear mixed model so that existing parameter estimation procedures and computer packages for nonlinear mixed models can be directly adopted to estimate the parameters. Through simulations, it was found that the SAS NLMIXED procedure could recover the parameters fairly well and produce appropriate standard errors, except when the two-parameter adjacent-category logits MIRID was fit to data with a small sample size and a short test length; overall, cumulative logits yielded a better parameter recovery than adjacent-category logits. A real data set about guilt was analyzed with gender as a Level 2 predictor to illustrate applications and applications of the new model. Further model generalization is discussed.
Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., & Wu, M. ( 1997). Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 47-76.
2.
Agresti, A. ( 1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
3.
Andersen, E.B. ( 2004). Latent regression analysis based on the rating scale model. Psychology Science, 46, 209-226.
4.
Barrett, K.C. ( 1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 25-63). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Birnbaum, A. ( 1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397-479). Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
6.
Butter, R., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N.D. (1998). An item response model with internal restrictions on item difficulty. Psychometrika , 63, 47-68.
7.
Chen, C.-T., & Wang, W.-C. ( 2007). Effects of ignoring item interaction on item parameter estimation and detection of interaction items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 388-411.
8.
De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Embretson (Whitely), S.E. ( 1984). A general latent trait model for response processes. Psychometrika, 49, 175-186.
11.
Fischer, G.H. ( 1973). The linear logistic test model as instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37, 359-374.
12.
Gilbert, P., Pehl, J., & Allan, S. ( 1994). The phenomenology of shame and guilt: An empirical investigation . British Journal of Medical Psychology, 67, 23-36.
13.
Hedeker, D. ( 1999). MIXNO: A computer program for mixed-effects nominal logistic regression. Journal of Statistical Software, 4, 1-92.
14.
Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R.D. ( 1996). MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 49, 157-176.
15.
Janssen, R., & De Boeck, P. ( 1996). The contribution of a response-production component to a free-response synonym task. Journal of Educational Measurement , 33, 417-432.
16.
Janssen, R., & De Boeck, P. ( 1997). Psychometric modeling of componentially designed synonym tasks. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 37-50.
17.
Janssen, R., Schepers, J., & Peres, D. ( 2004). Models with item and item group predictors. In P. De Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 189-212). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Masters, G.N. ( 1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
19.
McCulloch, C.E., & Searle, S.R. ( 2001). Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York: Wiley.
20.
Muraki, E. ( 1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM-algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159-176.
21.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W.J., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., et al. (2000). A user’s guide to MLwiN (Version 2.1). London: Institute of Education, University of London.
22.
Rasch, G. ( 1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogische Institut.
23.
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.-F., & Congdon, R. ( 2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling [Computer software and manual]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
24.
Samejima, F. ( 1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 17, 1-100.
25.
SAS Institute. (1999). The NLMIXED procedure [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
26.
Sheu, C.-F., Chen, C.-T., Su, Y.-H., & Wang, W.-C. ( 2005). Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models . Behavior Research Methods, 37, 202-218.
27.
Skrondal, A., & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
28.
Smits, D.J.M., & De Boeck, P. ( 2003). A componential model for guilt. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 161-188.
29.
Smits, D.J.M., De Boeck, P., & Hoskens, M. ( 2003). Examining the structure of concepts: Using interactions between items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 415-439.
30.
Smits, D.J.M., De Boeck, P., & Verhelst, N.D. (2003). Estimation of the MIRID: A program and a SAS-based approach. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 537-549.
31.
Smits, D.J.M., & Moore, S. ( 2004). Latent item predictors with fixed effects. In P. De Boeck & M. R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 267-287). New York: Springer-Verlag.
32.
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G., & Lunn, D. ( 2003). WinBUGS version 1.4 users manual. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/winbugs/manual14.pdf
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1977b). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Stout, W., Nandakumar, R., Junker, B., Chang, H., & Steidinger, D. (1992). DIMTEST: A Fortran program for assessing dimensionality of binary item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 236.
36.
Tangney, J.P. ( 1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 114-139). New York: Guilford Press.
37.
Wang, W.-C., & Jin, K-Y. (in press). Multilevel, two-parameter, and random-weights generalizations of the model with internal restrictions on item difficulty. Applied Psychological Measurement.t.
38.
Wang, W.-C., Wilson, M.R., & Shih, C.-L. ( 2006). Modeling randomness in judging rating scales with a random-effects rating scale model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 335-353.
39.
Yen, W.M. ( 1993). Scaling performance assessment: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement , 30, 187-213.
