Perceived Multiple Intelligences Among Male and Female Chinese Gifted Students in Hong Kong: The Structure of the Student Multiple Intelligences Profile
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2006
Perceived Multiple Intelligences Among Male and Female Chinese Gifted Students in Hong Kong: The Structure of the Student Multiple Intelligences Profile
This study examined the structure of perceived multiple intelligences of 1,464 Chinese gifted students using the Student Multiple Intelligences Profile. To evaluate whether perceived multiple intelligences could be applied adequately across boys and girls, a model hypothesizing different degrees of equivalence across the two gender groups was tested using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results indicated that the structure of perceived multiple intelligences, which included the number and nature of dimensions, as well as the structural relationships among the 8 intelligences assessed, was largely similar for boys and girls. Subsequent second-order confirmatory factor analyses separately conducted for boys and for girls suggested that both boys and girls might perceive the 8 intelligences as falling into either the broad category of personal intelligences or one of the nonpersonal intelligences. Implications of the findings including subtle differences in the perceived strengths on the 8 individual intelligences by boys and girls are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albert, R. S. (1994). The achievement of eminence: A longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 282-315). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2.
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
Armstrong, T. (1999). Seven kinds of smart. New York: Plume.
4.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?Science, 210, 1262-1264.
5.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
6.
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029-1031.
7.
Bennett, M. (1996). Men's and women's self-estimates of intelligence. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 411-412.
8.
Bennett, M. (1997). Self-estimates of ability in men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 540-541.
9.
Bentler, P. (1989). Comparative fit indices. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
10.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (2004). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Chan, D. W. (2000). Learning and teaching through the multiple-intelligences perspective: Implications for curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 15, 187-201.
14.
Chan, D. W. (2001). Assessing giftedness of Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: A multiple intelligences perspective. High Ability Studies, 12, 215-234.
15.
Chan, D. W. (2003). Adjustment problems and multiple intelligences among gifted students in Hong Kong: The development of the revised Student Adjustment Problems Inventory. High Ability Studies, 14, 41-54.
16.
Chen, J., & Gardner, H. (1997). Alternative assessment from a multiple intelligences theoretical perspective. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
Chen, M., Holman, J., Francis-Jones, N., & Burmester, L. (1988). Conceptions of intelligence of primary school, high school and college students. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 71-82.
18.
Coltheart, M., Hull, E., & Slater, D. (1975). Sex differences in imagery and reading. Science, 253, 438-440.
19.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Fasko, D., Jr. (2001). An analysis of multiple intelligences theory and its use with the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 23, 126-130.
21.
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103.
22.
Furman, A. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender difference in self and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381-1405.
23.
Furman, A., Clark, K., & Bailey, K. (1999). Sex differences in estimates of multiple intelligences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 247-259.
24.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Geary, D. C. (1989). A model for representing gender differences in the pattern of cognitive abilities. American Psychologist, 44, 1155-1156.
28.
Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189-194.
29.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Halpern, D. F., & LaMay, M. L. (2000). The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 229-246.
31.
Hong Kong Education Commission. (1990). Education Commission Report No. 4. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
32.
Hong Kong Education Department. (2000). Gifted education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Special Educational Needs Section, Curriculum Development Institute, Hong Kong.
33.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
34.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.
35.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
36.
Karolyi, C. V., Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences: A perspective on giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. David (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 100-112). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
Kornhaber, M., Krechevsky, M., & Gardner, H. (1990). Engaging intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 25, 177-199.
38.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-19.
40.
Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?Roeper Review, 22, 10-17.
41.
Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 80-92.
42.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scale. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
43.
Roets, L. F. (1997). Leadership: A skills training program (8th ed.). Des Moines, IA: Leadership Publishers.
44.
Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244-251.
45.
Schaie, K. W. (1994). The course of adult intellectual development. American Psychologist, 43, 179-183.
46.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
47.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
48.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A triarchic view of giftedness: Theory and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 43-53). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231-235.
51.
Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.
52.
Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1986). The theory of multiple intelligences: Some issues and answers. In R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligences (pp. 163-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Witelson, S. F. (1991). Neural sexual mosaicism: Sexual differentiation of the human temporo-parietal region for functional asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 131-153.
54.
Yussen, S., & Kane, P. (1985). Children's concept of intelligence. In S. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 207-241). New York: Academic Press.
