In this article, the authors examine the influence of attribution styles on the development of mathematical talent. The study employs a Self-Confidence Attitude Attribute Scale questionnaire, which measures ability and effort attributions. Participants are three groups of highly, moderately, or mildly mathematically gifted Finnish adolescents and adults (N = 203). The results of Bayesian classification modeling show that items attributing success to effort and failure to lack of effort are the best predictors for the level of mild mathematical giftedness and gender (females). The results of multivariate analysis of variance show that highly and moderately mathematically gifted students reported that ability was more important for success than effort, but mildly mathematically gifted tended to see effort as leading to success. Moderately and mildly mathematically gifted students attribute failure to lack of effort, whereas highly mathematically gifted students attribute failure to lack of ability.
Alderman, K. (2004). Motivation for achievement. Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Biggs, J. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
3.
Bradley, W. J., & Schaefer, K. C. (1998). The uses and misuses of data and models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Campbell, J. R. (1994). Developing cross-cultural/cross-national methods and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(7), 675-684.
5.
Campbell, J. R. (1995). Raising your child to be gifted. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
6.
Campbell, J. R. (1996a). Developing cross-national instruments: Using cross-national methods and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 485-496.
7.
Campbell, J. R. (1996b). Early identification of mathematics talent has long-term positive consequences for career contributions. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 497-522.
8.
Campbell, J. R., Tirri, K., Ruohotie, P., & Walberg, H. (Eds.). (2004). Cross-cultural research: Basic issues, dilemmas, and strategies. Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
9.
Chan, L. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 184-193.
10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63.
12.
Dweck, C. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
13.
Ellström, P.-E. (2001). The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification. In W. J. Nijhof & J. N. Streumer (Eds.), Key qualifications in work and education (pp. 39-50). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
14.
Enman, M., & Lupart, J. (2000). Talented female students' resistance to science: An exploratory study of post-secondary achievement motivation, persistence, and epistemological characteristics. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 161-178.
15.
Feng, A., Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. (2001). The talent development of American Physics Olympians. Gifted and Talented International, 16(2), 108-114.
16.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.
18.
Heller, K., & Lengfelder, A. (2000, April). German Olympiad study on mathematics, physics and chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19.
Hilario, M., Kalousisa, A., Pradosa, J., & Binzb, P.-A. (2004). Data mining for mass-spectra based diagnosis and biomarker discovery. Drug Discovery Today: BIOSILICO, 2(5), 214-222.
20.
Hsu, W. H. (2004). Genetic wrappers for feature selection in decision tree induction and variable ordering in Bayesian network structure learning. Information Sciences, 163(1-3), 103-122.
21.
Huberty, C. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: CBS College Publishing.
23.
Kerr, B. (1994). Smart girls: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
24.
Marsh, H. (1983). Relationships among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept and academic achievements. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 243 914)
25.
Marsh, H., & O'Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
26.
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38.
27.
Myllymäki, P., Silander, T., Tirri, H., & Uronen, P. (2002). B-Course: A Web-based tool for Bayesian and causal data analysis. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 11(3), 369-387.
28.
Nokelainen, P., Ruohotie, P., & Tirri, H. (1999). Professional growth determinants—Comparing Bayesian and linear approaches to classification. In P. Ruohotie, H. Tirri, P. Nokelainen, & T. Silander (Eds.), Modern modeling of professional growth(Vol. 1, pp. 85-120). Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
29.
Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, H. (2004). Bayesian methods that optimize cross-cultural data analysis. In J. R. Campbell, K. Tirri, P. Ruohotie, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Cross-cultural research: Basic issues, dilemmas, and strategies (pp. 141-158). Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
30.
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., & Campbell, J. R. (2004). Cross-cultural predictors of mathematical talent and academic productivity. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 230-242.
31.
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., Campbell, J. R., & Walberg, H. (2004). Isolating factors that contribute or hinder adult productivity: Comparing the Terman longitudinal studies with the retrospective Olympiad studies. In J. R. Campbell, K. Tirri, P. Ruohotie, & H. Walberg (Eds.),Cross-cultural research: Basic issues, dilemmas, and strategies (pp. 119-140). Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
32.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life. first results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: Author.
33.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.
34.
Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
35.
Reis, S. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
36.
Ruohotie, P., & Nokelainen, P. (2000). Modern modeling of student motivation and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Conative constructs and self-regulated learning (pp. 141-193). Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
37.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631-650). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
38.
Siegle, D., & Reis, S. (1998). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students' ability and effort. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 39-47.
39.
Silander, T., & Tirri, H. (1999). Bayesian classification. In P. Ruohotie, H. Tirri, P. Nokelainen, & T. Silander (Eds.), Modern modeling of professional growth (Vol. 1, pp. 61-84). Hämeenlinna, Finland: RCVE.
40.
Silander, T., & Tirri, H. (2000, April). Model selection for Bayesian networks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
41.
Strein, W. (1995). Assessment of self-concept. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 962)
42.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
43.
Tirri, K. (2001). Finland Olympiad studies: What factors contribute to the development of academic talent in Finland?Educating Able Children, 5(2), 56-66.
44.
Tirri, K. (2002). Developing females'talent: Case studies of Finnish Olympians. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 80-85.
45.
Tirri, K., & Campbell, J. (2002). Actualizing mathematical giftedness in adulthood. Educating Able Children, 6(1), 14-20.
46.
Vermeer, H. J., Boekaerts, M., & Seegers, G. (2000). Motivational and gender differences: Sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 308-315.
47.
Verna, M., & Campbell, J. R. (2000, April). Career orientations for American chemistry Olympians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
48.
Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
49.
Weiner, B. (1980). The role of affect in rational (attributional) approaches to human motivation. Educational Researcher, 9, 4-11.
50.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
51.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement striving. Review of Educational Research, 64, 557-573.
53.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14.
54.
Wu, W., & Chen, J. (2001). A follow-up study of Taiwan physics and chemistry Olympians: The role of environmental influences in talent development. Gifted and Talented International, 16(1), 16-26.
55.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Guilford.
56.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
