School Counselors’ Perceptions and Experience With Acceleration as a Program Option for Gifted and Talented Students

Abstract

This article presents findings from a national survey of 149 practicing school counselors who are members of the American School Counselor Association. The survey gathered information on school counselors’ perceptions of and experiences with acceleration as a program option for gifted students. Results indicate that, although school counselors’ opinions are being solicited in decision making regarding acceleration, they do not possess training and accurate information regarding acceleration. Hence, training and professional development focusing on the research-based practices of acceleration are needed to ensure that school counselors give accurate advice and guidance concerning gifted students’ education. Future research is needed to compare and contrast the effectiveness of accelerative decision making between school counselors who are trained and untrained in acceleration programmatic options.

Putting the Research to Use

School counselors are ubiquitous to schools and it is expected that they will assume an important role in the academic planning of students. In addition, they are looked to for consultation on the social and emotional development of students and how these dimensions may help or hinder academic choices. This study indicates that school counselors are prominent in the academic and social issues of gifted students when it comes to the issue of acceleration. Parents and educators do look to counselors for information and perspective regarding acceleration and counselors do provide their perspective. Also, acceleration has become a more prominent option for gifted students in schools. Unfortunately, the information and perspectives of school counselors on acceleration is not based on formal training and familiarity with the research but on informal information and limited knowledge of the research. School counselors are not well prepared to fulfill their role in helping parents, educators and students make sound decisions regarding acceleration. This study makes it clear that there is need for formal training of school counselors in the research and practice of acceleration both at the preservice and inservice levels. School counselors should participate in acceleration decisions because they bring a general and comprehensive understanding of the student. However, they need a specific understanding of acceleration in order to be effective in such decisions.

Keywords

acceleration social and/or emotional development and adjustment counseling training and preparation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American School Counselor Association. (2007 ). The professional school counselor and gifted and talented student programs. Retrieved from http://asca2.timberlakepublishing.com//files/PS_Gifted.pdf

Brody, L.E. , Muratori, M.C. , & Stanley, J.C. ( 2004). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 97-107). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Brown, L.L. ( 1993). Special considerations in counseling gifted students . School Counselor, 40, 184-191.

Colangelo, N. , Assouline, S. , & Gross, M. (Eds.). (2004a). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Colangelo, N. , Assouline, S. , & Gross, M. ( 2004b). Executive summary. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 1) . Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Duffet, A. , Farkas, S. , & Loveless, T. ( 2008). Executive summary. In A. Duffet , S. Farkas , & T. Loveless (Eds.), High-achieving students in the era of NCLB (pp. 2-7). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

Gallagher, J.J. ( 1969). Gifted children. In R. L. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed., pp. 537-544). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Gross, M. ( 1993). Exceptionally gifted children (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge/Falmer .

Gross, M. ( 2004). Radical acceleration. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 87-96). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

10.

Kulik, J.A. ( 2004). Meta-analytic studies of acceleration. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 13-22). Iowa City, IA : The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

11.

Lubinski, D. ( 2004). Long-term effects of educational acceleration. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 23-37). Iowa City, IA : The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

12.

Marron, M.A. , Lohman, D.F. , Colangelo, N. , & Assouline, S.G. (2008, August). Academic acceleration in schools: A survey of attitudes and practices. Poster session presented at the American Psychological Association conference , Boston, MA

13.

Milsom, A. , & Peterson, J. ( 2006). Introduction to special issue: Examining disability and giftedness in schools. Professional School Counseling, 10(1), 1-2.

14.

National Association for Gifted Children. ( 2004, September). NAGC position statement: Acceleration. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=383

15.

Neihart, M. ( 2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 330-341.

16.

Peterson, J.S. , & Wachter, C.A. (in press). Understanding and responding to concerns related to giftedness: A study of CACREPaccredited programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted.

17.

Robinson, N.M. ( 2004). Effects of academic acceleration on the social-emotional status of gifted students. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 59-67). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

18.

Rogers, K.B. ( 2004). The academic effects of acceleration. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 47-58). Iowa City, IA : The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

19.

Southern, W.T. , & Jones, E.D. ( 2004). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In N. Colangelo , S. Assouline , & M. Gross (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 13-22). Iowa City, IA : The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

20.

Southern, W.T. , Jones, E.D. , & Fiscus, E.D. ( 1989). Practitioners objections to the academic acceleration of young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.

21.

Stanley, J.C. ( 2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 216-222.