Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task switching and interruption management. Background: Effective support for the allocation of limited attentional resources is needed for operators who must cope with numerous competing task demands and frequent interruptions in data-rich, event-driven domains. One prerequisite for meeting this need is to provide information that allows them to make informed decisions about, and before, (re)orienting their attentional focus. Method: Thirty participants performed a continuous visual task. Occasionally, they were presented with a peripheral visual or tactile cue that indicated the need to attend to a separate visual task. The location, frequency, and duration parameters of these cues represented the domain, importance, and expected completion time, respectively, of the interrupting task. Results: The findings show that the informative cues were detected and interpreted reliably. Information about the importance (rather than duration) of the task was used by participants to decide whether to switch attention to the interruption, indicating adherence to experimenter instructions. Erroneous task-switching behavior (nonadherence to experimenter instructions) was mostly caused by misinterpretation of cues. Conclusion: The effectiveness of informative peripheral visual and tactile cues for supporting interruption management was validated in this study. However, the specific implementation of these cues requires further work and needs to be tailored to specific domain requirements. Application: The findings from this research can inform the design of more effective notification systems for a variety of complex event-driven domains, such as aviation, medicine, or process control.
Bonferroni, C.E. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità [Statistical theory of classes and calculating the probability] . Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze, 8, 3-62.
2.
Czerwinski, M., Chrisman, S.E., & Schumacher, B. (1991). The effects of warnings and display similarities on interruption in multitasking environments. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(4), 38-39.
3.
Funk, K., & Braune, R. (1999, October). The agenda manager: A knowledge-based system to facilitate the management of flight deck activities. In Proceedings of the 1999 World Aviation Congress (pp. 1-15) in San Francisco Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
4.
Gillie, T., & Broadbent, D. (1989). What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research , 50, 243-250.
Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171-216.
7.
Johnson, K.O., & Phillips, J.R. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 1177-1191.
8.
Jones, L.A., & Sarter, N. (2008). Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50, 90-111.
9.
Latorella, K.A. (1998). Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 87-91). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Martin, C., Schreckenghost, D., Bonasso, P., Kortenkamp, D., Milam, T., & Thronesbery, C. (2003). Helping humans: Agents for distributed space operations. In Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space: i-SAIRAS 2003. Retrieved March 25, 2009 , from http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas2003/data/pdf/AM39paper.pdf
12.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
13.
Miyata, Y., & Norman, D.A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities . In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 265-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Moy, G., Singh, U., Tan, E., & Fearing, R.S. (2000). Human tactile spatial sensitivity for tactile feedback. In Proceedings of ICRA `00: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Vol.1, pp. 776-782). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
15.
Nikolic, M.I., Orr, J.M., & Sarter, N.B. (2004). Why pilots miss the green box: How display context undermines attention capture. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 39-52.
16.
Nikolic, M.I., & Sarter, N.B. (2001). Peripheral visual feedback: A powerful means of supporting attention allocation and human-automation coordination in highly dynamic data-rich environments. Human Factors, 43, 30-38.
17.
Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
18.
Rogers, R.D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 124, 207-221.
19.
Sarter, N.B. (2002). Multimodal information presentation in support of human-automation communication and coordination. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 13-36). New York: JAI.
20.
Sarter, N.B. (2006). Multimodal information presentation: Design guidance and research challenges. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 439-445.
21.
Sarter, N.B. (2007). Multiple resource theory as a basis for multimodal interface design: Success stories and qualifications. In A. Kramer, D. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 187-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Sklar, A.E., & Sarter, N.B. (1999). "Good vibrations": The use of tactile feedback in support of mode awareness on advanced technology aircraft. Human Factors, 41, 543-552.
Speier, C., Valacich, J.S., & Vessey, I. (1997). The effects of task interruption and information presentation on individual decision making. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 21-36). New York: Association for Computing Machinery .
25.
Wickens, C.D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-101). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26.
Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd edition). New York: HarperCollins.
27.
Woods, D.D. (1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371-2393.
28.
Wright, B.A., Buonomano, D.V., Mahncke, H.W., & Merzenich, M.M. (1997). Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3956-3963.
