Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2010
Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects
Relational demography research has its roots in social identity theory. However, prior research has not directly tested the effects of the two primary motives of social identification; uncertainty reduction and status enhancement. In this study, we examined the moderating effects of these motives on the relationship between demographic similarity and individuals’ affective reactions toward their work group. Uncertainty reduction, which we operationalized as self-continuity, moderated the relationship between race similarity and cohesiveness. In addition, status enhancement moderated both race and gender similarity effects on the group outcomes. We discuss implications of our findings for theory and research.
Aiken LS, West SG ( 1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
Ashforth BE, Mael F. ( 1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14: 20-39.
3.
Bentler PM ( 1990) Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107: 238-246.
4.
Blanz M., Mummendey A., Mielke R., and Klink A. ( 1998) Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology28: 697-729.
5.
Brockner J. ( 1988) Self-esteem at Work: Research, Theory, and Practice. Lexington, MA: DC Health.
6.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. ( 1993) Alternative ways of assessing fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 136-162.
7.
Byrne DE ( 1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Chattopadhyay P. ( 1999) Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal42: 273.
9.
Chattopadhyay P. ( 2003) Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds. Journal of Organizational Behavior24: 295.
10.
Chattopadhyay P., George E., and Lawrence SA ( 2004) Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology89: 892-900.
11.
Chattopadhyay P., Tluchowska M., and George E. ( 2004) Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review29: 180-202.
12.
Cohen J., Cohen P. ( 1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cunningham GB, Sagas M. ( 2006) The role of perceived demographic dissimilarity and interaction in customer-service satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology36: 1654-1673.
15.
Ellemers N., Wilke H., and Van Knippenberg A. (1993) Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64: 766-778.
16.
Elsass PM and Graves LM ( 1997) Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: The experiences of women and people of color. Academy of Management Review22: 946-978.
17.
Fischer DG, Fick C. ( 1993) Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement53: 417-424.
18.
Flynn FJ, Chatman JA, and Spataro SE ( 2001) Getting to know you: The influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly46: 414-442.
19.
Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF ( 2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
20.
Glaman JM, Jones AP, and Rozelle RM ( 1996) The effects of co-worker similarity on the emergence of affect in work teams. Group & Organization Management21: 192-116.
21.
Goldberg CB ( 2005) Relational demography and similarity-attraction in interview assessments and subsequent offer decisions: Are we missing something? Group & Organization Management30: 597-624.
22.
Goldberg C., Shore LM ( 2003) The impact of age of applicants and of referent others on recruiters’ assessments: A study of young and middle-aged job seekers . Representative Research in Social Psychology27: 11-22.
23.
Goldberg C., Finkelstein L., Perry E., and Konrad A. ( 2004) Job and industry fit: The effects of age and gender matches on career progress outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior25: 807-829.
24.
Goldberg C., Riordan C., and Zhang L. ( 2008) Relational demography and leadership perceptions: Is similar always better? Group and Organization Management33: 330-355.
25.
Grieve P., Hogg MA ( 1999) Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25(8): 926-940.
26.
Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ, and Lickel B. ( 1998) Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In: Sedikides C, Schopler J, and Insko CA (eds) Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers , 47-74.
27.
Harrison DA, Price KH, and Bell MP ( 1998) Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal41: 96-107.
28.
Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, and Florey AT ( 2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal45: 1029-1045.
29.
Haslam SA ( 2004) Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach . London: SAGE.
30.
Haslam SA, Ellemers N. ( 2005) Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies, and contributions. In: Hodgkinson GP (ed.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley, 39-188.
31.
Hobman EV, Bordia P., and Gallois C. ( 2004) Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effects of group openness to diversity. Group & Organization Management29: 560-587.
32.
Hodson G., Sorrentino RM ( 2001) Just who favors the in-group? Personality differences in reactions to uncertainty in the minimal group paradigm. Group Dynamics5: 92-101.
33.
Hornsey MJ, Hogg MA ( 2002) The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology41: 203-218.
34.
Hogg MA ( 2006) Social identity theory. In: Burke PJ (ed.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 111-136.
35.
Hogg MA ( 2008) Personality, individuality, and social identity. In: Rhodewalt F (ed.) Personality and Social Behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 177-196.
36.
Hogg MA, Abrams D. ( 1993) Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In: Hogg MA, Abrams D (eds) Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives. Hemel Hempstead : Harvester Wheatsheaf, 173-190.
37.
Hogg MA, Terry DJ ( 2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25: 121-141.
38.
Hogg MA, Turner JC ( 1985) Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology15: 51-66.
39.
James K., Khoo G. ( 1991) Identity-related influences on the success of minority workers in primarily nonminority organizations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences13: 169-192.
40.
Jehn KA ( 1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 256-283.
41.
Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, and Neale MA ( 1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 741-763.
42.
Jetten J., Spears R., Hogg MA, and Manstead A. ( 2000) Discrimination constrained and justified: Variable effects of group variability and in-group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology36(4): 329-356.
43.
Kirchmeyer C. ( 1995) Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior16: 67-83.
44.
Knouse SB, Dansby MR ( 1999) Percentage of work group diversity and work group performance . Journal of Psychology133: 486-494.
45.
Konrad AM, Gutek BA ( 1987) Theory and research on group composition: Applications to the status of women and ethnic minorites. In: Oskamp S, Spacapan S (eds) Interpersonal Processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 85-121.
46.
Kramer RM ( 1991) Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior13: 191-228.
47.
Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ ( 2002) Confirmatory factor analysis. In: Drasgow F, Schmitt N (eds) Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 221-254.
48.
Lawrence BS ( 1997) The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science8: 1-22.
49.
Lindell MK, Whitney DJ ( 2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. Journal of Applied Psychology86: 114-121.
50.
Marsh HW, Hocevar D. ( 1985) The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin97: 562-582.
51.
Milliken FJ, Martins LL ( 1996) Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review21: 402-434.
52.
O’Reilly CA, Caldwell D., and Barnett W. ( 1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover . Administrative Science Quarterly34: 21-37.
53.
Pearce JL, Gregersen HB ( 1991) Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology76: 838-844.
54.
Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, and Xin KR ( 1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 1-28.
55.
Pelled LH, Xin KR, and Weiss AM ( 2001) No es como mi: Relational demography and conflict in a Mexican production facility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74: 63-84.
56.
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J., and Podsakoff N. ( 2003) Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879-903.
57.
Podsakoff PM, Organ DW ( 1986) Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management12: 531-545.
58.
Polzer JT, Milton LP, and Swann WB ( 2002) Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly47: 296-324.
59.
Randel AE ( 2002) Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior23: 749-762.
60.
Reid SA, Hogg MA ( 2005) Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(6): 804-817.
61.
Riordan CM ( 2000) Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. In: Ferris GR, Rowlands KM (eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 19. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 131-173.
62.
Riordan CM, Schaffer BS, and Steward MM ( 2005) Relational demography within groups: Through the lens of discrimination. In: Dipboye RL, Collela A (eds) Discrimination at Work: The psychological and organizational bases, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 37-61.
63.
Riordan CM, Shore LM ( 1997) Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology82: 342-358.
64.
Riordan CM, Weatherly E. ( 1999) Defining and measuring employees’ identification with their work groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement59: 310-324.
65.
Shamir B. ( 1991) Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies12: 405-424.
66.
Shore LM, Cleveland JN, and Goldberg CB ( 2003) Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 529-537.
67.
Smith JR, Hogg MA, Martin R., and Terry DJ ( 2007) Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology46(4): 769-792.
68.
Steele CM ( 1988) The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology21: 261-302.
69.
Tajfel H. ( 1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Tajfel H., Turner J. ( 1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7-24.
71.
Thomas DA, Gabarro JJ ( 1999) Haven’t you forgotten something? Journal of Business Strategy20: 5-6.
72.
Tourangeau R., Rips LJ, and Rasinski K. ( 2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Tsui AS, Egan TD, and O’Reilly C. (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 549-579.
74.
Turner JC, Brown RJ, and Tajfel H. ( 1979) Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism . European Journal of Social Psychology9(2): 187-204.
75.
Webber SS, Donahue LM ( 2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.
76.
Zenger TR, Lawrence BS ( 1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal32: 353-376.
