In a 2005 effort to reinvigorate new-member organizing efforts, seven unions split from the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) to form a new union federation, Change to Win. Using ten years of data from the National Labor Relations Board and the National Mediation Board and a difference-in-difference estimator, the author estimates the effect of Change to Win policies on whether a union won its certification election and the number and percentage of workers successfully organized. The results indicate no statistically significant difference in organizing success following Change to Win’s implementation of new organizing strategies and practices, relative to the AFL-CIO.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AtlesonJames B.1994. Law and union power: Thoughts on the United States and Canada. Buffalo Law Review42: 463–500.
3.
BenzDorothee. 2002. Organizing to survive, bargaining to organize. Working USA6(1): 95–107.
4.
BertrandMarianneDufloEstherMullainathanSendhil. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics119(1): 249–75.
5.
BronfenbrennerKate. 1997. The role of union strategies in NLRB certification elections. Industrial and Labor Relations Review50(2): 195–212.
6.
BronfenbrennerKate. 2008. The US experience of organising in the context of the global economy. In HastingsTim (Ed.), The State of the Unions: Challenges Facing Organized Labour in Ireland, pp. 185–217. Dublin: Liffey Press. Accessed at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/247/.
BronfenbrennerKateHickeyRobert. 2004. Changing to organize: A national assessment of union strategies. In MilkmanRuthVossKim (Eds.), Rebuilding Labor: Organizing and Organizers in the New Union Movement, pp. 17–55. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
BronfenbrennerKateJuravichTom. 1998. It takes more than house calls: Organizing to win with a comprehensive union-building strategy. In BronfenbrennerKateFriedmanSheldonHurdRichard W.OswaldRudolph A.SeeberRonald L. (Eds.), Organizing to Win: New Research on Union Strategies, pp. 19–36. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
10.
BrudneyJames J.2005. Neutrality agreements and card check recognition: Prospects for changing paradigms. Iowa Law Review90: 819–86.
11.
CameronA. ColinGelbachJonah B.MillerDouglas L.2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics90(3): 414–27.
12.
ChaisonGary. 2007. The AFL-CIO split: Does it really matter?Journal of Labor Research28(2): 301–11.
13.
ChandlerTimothy D.GelyRafael. 2007. Fishing in different ponds: Union organizing across industries. Working USA: The Journal of Labor and Society10(2): 209–24.
ConleyTimothy G.TaberChristopher R.2011. Inference with “difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes. Review of Economics and Statistics93(1): 113–25.
16.
CookeWilliam N.1983. Determinants of the outcomes of union certification elections. Industrial and Labor Relations Review36(3): 402–14.
17.
DevinatzVictor G.2010. Does the Change to Win federation represent U.S. labor’s third moment? Evidence from National Labor Relations Board Certification Elections, 2003–2005. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal22(3): 161–73.
18.
DinePhilip M.2007. State of the Unions: How Labor Can Strengthen the Middle Class, Improve Our Economy, and Regain Political Influence. New York: McGraw Hill.
19.
DonaldStephen G.LangKevin. 2007. Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics89(2): 221–33.
20.
EatonAdrienne E.KrieskyJill. 2001. Union organizing under neutrality and card check agreements. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55(1): 42–59.
21.
EstlundCynthia L.LobelOrlyCompaLanceScottJudith A.2006. New ways of governing the workplace: Proceedings of the 2007 meeting of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Labor Relations and Employment Law. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal11(1): 111.
22.
EstreicherSamuel. 2006. Disunity within the house of labor: Change to win or to stay the course?Journal of Labor Research27(4): 505–11.
23.
FantasiaRickVossKim. 2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
FarberHenry S.1984. Right-to-work laws and the extent of unionization. Journal of Labor Economics2(3): 319–52.
25.
FarberHenry S.2001. Union success in representation elections: Why does unit size matter?Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(2): 329–48.
26.
FarberHenry S.WesternBruce. 2001. Accounting for the decline of unions in the private sector, 1973–1998. Journal of Labor Research22(3): 459–85.
27.
FergusonJohn-Paul. 2008. The eyes of the needles: A sequential model of union organizing drives, 1999–2004. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(1): 3–21.
28.
FergusonJohn-Paul2009. Contest, social valuation and change in American labor-union organizing, 1961 to 2004. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
29.
FioritoJackJarleyPaul. 2010. Understanding organising activity among US national unions. Industrial Relations Journal41(1): 74–92.
30.
FioritoJackJarleyPaul. 2012. Union organizing and membership growth: Why don’t they organize?Journal of Labor Research33(4): 461–86.
31.
FitzmauriceGarrett M.LairdNam M.WareJames H.2011. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
32.
GalianiSebastianGertlerPaulSchargrodskyErnesto. 2005. Water for life: The impact of privatization of water services on child mortality. Journal of Political Economy113(1): 83–120.
33.
GelyRafaelChandlerTimothy D.2007. Card check recognition: New house rules for union organizing?Fordham Urban Law Journal35(2): 247–76.
34.
HurdRichard W.2007. U.S. Labor 2006: Strategic developments across the divide. Journal of Labor Research28(2): 313–25.
35.
HurdRichard W.2008. Neutrality agreements: Innovative, controversial, and labor’s hope for the future. New Labor Forum17(1): 35–45.
KatzHarry C.BattRosemaryKeefeJeffrey H.2003. The revitalization of the CWA: Integrating collective bargaining, political action, and organizing. Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(4): 573–89.
38.
LemieuxThomasMilliganKevin. 2008. Incentive effects of social assistance: A regression discontinuity approach. Journal of Econometrics142(2): 807–28.
39.
MartinAndrew W.2008. The institutional logic of union organizing and the effectiveness of social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology113(4): 1067–103.
40.
MastersMarick F.GibneyRayZagenczykTom. 2006. The AFL-CIO v. CTW: The competing visions, strategies, and structures. Journal of Labor Research27(4): 473–504.
41.
MeyerBruce D.1995. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics13(2): 151–61.
42.
MilkmanRuth. 2006. Divided we stand. New Labor Forum15(1): 38–46.
43.
MilkmanRuthWongKent. 2001. Organizing immigrant workers: Case studies from Southern California. In TurnerLowellKatzHarry C.HurdRichard W. (Eds.), Rekindling the Movement: Labor’s Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century, pp. 99–128. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
44.
ReedThomas F.1989. Do union organizers matter? Individual differences, campaign practices, and representation election outcomes. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(1): 103–19.
45.
RoofTracy. 2007. CTW vs. the AFL-CIO: The potential impact of the split on labor’s political action. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior10(2): 245–75.
46.
RoseJoseph B.ChaisonGary N.1996. Linking union density and union effectiveness: The North American experience. Industrial Relations35(1): 78–105.
47.
RudyPreston. 2004. “Justice for Janitors,” not “Compensation for Custodians.” In MilkmanRuthVossKim (Eds.), Rebuilding Labor: Organizing and Organizers in the New Union Movement, pp. 133–49. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
SchiavoneMichael. 2008. Unions in Crisis: The Future of Organized Labor in America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
49.
TurnerLowellKatzHarry C.HurdRichard W.2001. Revival of the American labor movement: Issues, problems, prospects. In TurnerLowellKatzHarry C.HurdRichard W. (Eds.), Rekindling the Movement: Labor’s Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century, pp. 1–5. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
50.
WaldingerRoger D.EricksonChrisMilkmanRuthMitchellDaniel J. B.ValenzuelaAbelWongKentZeitlinMaurice. 1998. Helots no more: A case study of the Justice for Janitors campaign in Los Angeles. In BronfenbrennerKateFriedmanSheldonHurdRichard W.OswaldRudolph A.SeeberRonald L (Eds.), Organizing to Win: New Research on Union Strategies, pp. 102–20. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
