In the past 20 years, decentralization has been proposed as a strategy for enhancing public participation. Aid-providing organizations, such as the World Bank, stimulated decentralization processes in several countries in the hope that this would promote civic empowerment, diminish corruption, enhance efficiency, and improve public service delivery. This assumption forms the basis for a comparative analysis into the relation between decentralization and participation at the local level in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. A multi-level regression analysis using the data of the Democracy and Local Governance Project was undertaken in order to test the `one size fits all' and the `diversity in development' hypotheses. The results show that the second hypothesis was corroborated. Perceived autonomy had a different impact on openness to participation depending on the country considered; in one country (Japan), perceived autonomy diminished public officials' willingness to be open to public participation.
Ahmad, Junaid, Devarajan, Shantayanan, Khemani, Stuti and Shah, Shekhar (2005) Decentralization and Service Delivery. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group (World Bank Policy Research Paper 3603, May 2005), http://gtzsfdm.or.id/documents/dec_ind/o_pa_doc/Ahmad%20etal%202005%20Decentr-ServiceDelivery.pdf
2.
Aldrich, Howard (1979) Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Almeida, Maria Hermínia T. de (2003) Democracia, política e governo local. Projeto de Pesquisa 2003—2007. São Paulo: Fundação de Amparao à Pesquia do Estado de São Paulo — FAPESP. http://www.fapesp.br/materia.php?data[id_materia]=1317
4.
Almeida, Maria Hermínia T. de and Carneiro, Leandro P. (2003) `Liderança local, democracia e políticas públicas no Brasil', Opinião PúblicaIX(1): 124—47.
5.
Almond, G.A. and Powell, G.B. (2003) Comparative Politics Today: A World View. New York: Longman.
6.
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Campbell, Tim (2003) The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
10.
Cheema, G. Shabbir and Rondinelli, Denis A. (1982) Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries, London: Sage.
11.
Clark B. and Foweraker, J. , eds (2001) `The New Institutionalism', in The Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought. London : Routledge.
12.
Cohen, John M. and Peterson, Stephen B. (1999) Administrative Decentralization: Strategies for Developing Countries. West Hartford, CT : Kumarian Press.
13.
Congresso Nacional (2000) Lei Complementar No. 101. Brasília: Congresso Nacional. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/LCP/Lcp101.htm
14.
Crook, Richard and Manor, James (1998) Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Crook, Richard and Manor, James (2000) `Democratic Decentralization', OED Working Paper no. 21086. Washington, DC: World Bank . wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/11/30/000094946_00110905313521/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
16.
Da Cunha, P.V. and Peña, M.V.J. (1997) `The Limits and Merits of Participation', Working Paper no. 1838. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://econ.worldbank.org/docs/594.pdf
17.
Dabla-Norris, Era, Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Norregaard, John (2000a) `Fiscal Decentralization in Russia: Economic Performance and Reform Issues', Paper presented at Conference on Post-election Strategy, International Monetary Fund — IMF. Moscow, 5—7 April. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/invest/pdf/norris.pdf
18.
Dabla-Norris, Era, Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Norregaard, John (2000b) `Making Decentralization Work: The Case of Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan', http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/norris.pdf
19.
Dahl, Robert A. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
De Vries, Michiel S. (2000a) `The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries', European Journal of Political Research38: 193—224.
21.
De Vries, Michiel S. (2000b) `Left and Right among Local Elites: Comparative Figures from Switzerland, Spain, Germany and the Netherlands', Local Government Studies26(3): 91—118.
22.
Democracy and Local Governance Codebook (1997 ) Democracy and Local Governance Project. http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/dlg/dlgcbk.html
23.
Desai, Raj M., Freinkman, Lev M. and Goldberg, Itzhak (2003) `Fiscal Federalism and Regional Growth: Evidence from the Russian Federation in the 1990s', World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 3138. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org.ru/ECA/Russia.nsf/ECADocByUnid/E6F1881459145A4BC3256E270038B5F1/$FILE/fisc_fed_eng.pdf
24.
Di Gropello, Emanuela (2004) `Education Decentralization and Accountability Relationships in Latin America', World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3453. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
25.
Dillinger, William (1994). Decentralization and its Implications for Service Delivery. Urban Management and Municipal Finance 16. Washington, DC: UNDP/UNCHS/World Bank. http://www.unchs.org/programmes/ump/documents/UMP16.pdf
26.
Dryzek, John S. (1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Eaton, Ken and Dickovick, J. Tyler (2004) `The Politics of Re-centralization in Argentina and Brazil', Latin American Research Review39(1): 90—122.
28.
Eckardt, Sebastian (2002) Russia's Market Distorting Federalism: Decentralisation, Governance, and Economic Performance in Russia in the 90s. Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Institutsder Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsbereich Politik und Gesellschaft. Heft 42. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~segbers/working_papers/AP42.pdf
29.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge and London: Polity Press.
30.
Estache, Antonio, Foster, Vivien and Wodon, Quentin (2002) Accounting for Poverty in Infrastructure Reform: Learning from Latin America's Experience. WBI Studies in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
31.
Etzioni, Amitai (1969) `The Fallacy of Decentralization', The Nation 25 August: 145—7.
32.
Faguet, Jean-Paul (1997) `Decentralization and Local Government Performance ', paper presented at the Technical Consultation on Decentralization, Food and Agricultural Organization , 16—18 December, Rome, Italy.
33.
Ferlie, Ewan, Ashburner, Lynn, Fitzgerald, Louise and Pettigrew, Andrew (1996) The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Fukuyama, Francis (1995) Trust the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity . New York: Free Press.
35.
Goldsmith, Mike and Larsen, Helge (2004) `Local Political Leadership: Nordic Style', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(1): 121—33.
36.
Habermas, Jürgen (1998) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Harkness, Janet A., van de Vijver, Fons J.R. and Mohler, Peter (2002) Cross-cultural Survey Methods. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication; John Wiley and Sons (Wiley Series in Survey Methodology).
38.
Hart, David K. (1972) `Theories of Government Related to Decentralization and Citizen Participation', Public Administration Review32: 603—22.
39.
Heady, Ferrel (1996) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective . New York: Marcel Dekker.
40.
Inglehart, Ronald (1988) `The Renaissance of Political Culture', American Political Science Review82(4): 1203—29.
41.
Jacob, B.M., Ostrowski, K. and Teune, H. (1993) Democracy and Local Governance: Ten Empirical Studies . Matsunaga Institute for Peace, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
42.
Jacob, B.M., Linder, W., Nabholz, R. and Heierli, C. (1999) Democracy and Local Governance: Nine Empirical Studies. Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
43.
Jun, Jon S. and Muto, Hiromi (1998) `The Politics of Administrative Reform in Japan: More Strategies, Less Progress', International Review of Administrative Sciences64(2): 195—202.
44.
Kohl, Benjamin (2003) `Democratizing Decentralization in Bolivia: The Law of Popular Participation', Journal of Planning Education and Research23: 153—64.
45.
Koike, Osamu and Wright, Deil S. (1998) `Five Phases of Intergovernmental Relations in Japan: Policy Shifts and Governance Reform', International Review of Administrative Sciences64: 203—18.
46.
Lagos, Marta (2001) `Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America', Journal of Democracy12(1): 137—45.
47.
Litvack, Janine, Ahmad, Junaid and Bird, Richard (1998) Rethinking Decentralization, Sector Studies Series . Washington DC: World Bank. http://www.1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/Rethinking%20Decentralization.pdf
48.
Mendras, Marie (2001) `La question de l'état: la recentralisation impossible' , Critique Internationale12: 145—57.
49.
Mohan, Giles and Stokke, Kristian (2000) `Participatory Development and Empowerment: The Dangers of Localism', Third World Quarterly21(2): 247—68.
50.
Oxhorn, Philip, Tulchin, Joseph S. and Selee, Andrew D. (2004) Decentralization, Democratic Governance, and Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Africa, Asia and Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
51.
Page, Edward C. (1991) Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro, Diretório Regional de São Paulo (2004) Site Oficial. http://www.pmdbsp.com.br
53.
Pateman, Carole (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Polishchuk, Leonid (2000) Decentralization in Russia: Impact for Quality of Governance. Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, University of Maryland. http://www.iris.umd.edu/news/conferences/polishchuk.pdf
55.
Ponthieux, Sophie (2004) `The Concept of Social Capital: A Critical Review ', paper presented at the 10th ACN Conference, 21—23 January, Paris, France. http://www.insee.fr/en/nom_def_met/colloques/acn/colloque_10/ponthieux.pdf
56.
Przeworski, Adam (2004) `Institutions Matter?', Government and Opposition39(4): 527—40.
57.
Putnam, Robert, Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
Rondinelli, Denis A., Nellis, John R. and Cheema, G. Shabbir (1983) `Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience', World Bank Staff Working Paper Number 581, Management and Development Series No. 8. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/hdnetwork/pdf_notes/Decentralization%20in%20developing%20countries.pdf
59.
Santín del Río, Leticia (2004) `Twenty Years of Decentralization in Mexico: A Top Down Process', in Philip Oxhorn, Joseph S. Tulchin and Andrew D. Selee (eds) Decentralization, Democratic Governance, and Civil Society in Comparative Perspective: Africa, Asia and Latin America , pp. 33—58. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
60.
Santos, Boaventura de Souza (2002) `Orçamento Participativo em Porto Alegre: Para uma Democracia Redistributiva', in Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Democratizar a Democracia: Os Caminhos da Democracia Participativa, pp. 455—559. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
61.
Seligson, Mitchell A. and Rennó, Lucio R. (2000) `Mensurando confiança interpessoal: notas acerca de um conceito multidimensional', Dados [online] 43(4). <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011—52582000000400007&lng=pt&nrm=iso>ISSN0011—5258.doi:10.1590/S0011—52582000000400007script=sci_arttext&pid=S001152582000000400007&lng=en&nrm=iso
62.
Souza, Celina (2001) `Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Limits and Possibilities in Building Democratic Institutions', Environment and Urbanization13(13): 159—84.
63.
Stewart, D.W., Sprinthall, N.A. and Kem, J.D. (2002) `Moral Reasoning in the Context of Reform: A Study of Russian Officials', Public Administration Review62(3): 282—97.
64.
Swedish Riksdag (1991) Swedish Local Government Act. http://www.sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/02/95/35/ca584fee.pdf
65.
Timofeev, Andrei (2002) `Fiscal Decentralization and Soft Budget Constraints' , Economics Education and Research Consortium. Working Paper Series No. 01/12. Moscow: EERC. http://www.eerc.ru/publications/workpapers/WP_01—12e.pdf
66.
Transparency International (2004). TI Corruption Perception Index. http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2004/cpi2004.en.html#cpi2004
67.
United Nations Development Program (2004) Human Development Report 2004. Inequality in Income or Consumption. http://hdr.undp.org/statistics/data/indic/indic_138_1_1.html
68.
Wampler, Brian and Avritzer, Leonardo (2004) `Participatory Publics: Civil Society and New Institutions in Democratic Brazil', Comparative Politics36(3): 291—312.
69.
World Bank, The (1994) World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
70.
World Bank, The (2001) Indonesia — Country Procurement Assessment Report: Reforming the Public Procurement System . Jacarta: World Bank Office. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/ProcurementAssessment.pdf
71.
World Bank, The (2003) LAO PDR: Country Procurement Assessment Report 2003, report 25334 LA. Washington, DC: World Bank.
72.
World Bank, The (2004) World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, DC: World Bank.
73.
World Bank, The (2005a) Making Decentralization Work. http://www.worldbank.or.id — January.
74.
World Bank, The (2005b) Decentralization and Subnational Economics Homepage. http://www.1.worldbank.org/publicsector/decentralization/operations.htm
