This study re-examines professional autonomy within China’s anti-drug social work by highlighting the role of relational work. Using qualitative case studies of four rehabilitation organisations in two cities, it explores how social workers build trust, networks, and reputation to sustain practice under structural constraints. Findings reveal contrasting paths: a professionalised organisation losing projects due to weak political ties, and a bureaucratic one gaining stability through administrative trust. Relational work thus functions as a key mechanism for negotiating survival, opportunity, and ethics within restrictive party-state-led, penal-welfarist systems. The study contributes to global social work by showing that autonomy in the Global South is not a fixed condition but a dynamic, relational practice enabling limited yet vital professional agency.
BandeljN (2012) Relational work and economic sociology. Politics & Society40(2): 175–201.
3.
BanksS (2004) Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions. Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BanksS (2014) Reflections to the responses to “reclaiming social work ethics. Critical and radical debates in social work: Ethics. 77–83. DOI: 10.46692/9781447317357.046
5.
BanksS (2020) Ethics and Values in Social Work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
6.
BerridgeV (2013) Demons: Our Changing Attitudes to Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drugs. Oxford University Press.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4): 589–597.
8.
BurtonJVan den BroekD (2009) Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work39(7): 1326–1342.
9.
CheungJCS (2017) Social work guanxi: A reflexive account of the social work relationship in the Chinese context. European Journal of Social Work20(1): 101–111.
10.
DominelliL (2004) Social Work: Theory and Practice for a Changing Profession. Polity Press.
11.
EvansT (2010) Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-level Bureaucracy. Ashgate.
12.
FraserSValentineK (2008) Substance and Substitution: Methadone Subjects in Liberal Societies. Springer.
13.
GillG (2003) The twentieth century: The state embedded? In: GillGGillGJ (eds) The Nature and Development of the Modern State. Macmillan Education, pp.194–225.
14.
GrayMWebbSA (2013) Social Work Theories and Methods, 2nd edn.Sage.
15.
GuoW (2025) Party-building leadership and the practical logic of high-quality social work development in the new era. Social Work 38–53: 153–154 (in Chinese).
16.
HeX (2017) Project-based social work and institutionalised development. China Social Work6: 12–20 (in Chinese).
17.
HealyLM (2008) Exploring the history of social work as a human rights profession. International Social Work51(6): 735–748.
18.
Iarskaia-SmirnovaE (2004) Professional development of social work in Russia. Social Work & Society2(1): 132–138.
19.
JannWLægreidP (2015) Reforming the welfare state: Accountability, management, and performance. International Journal of Public Administration 38(13-14):941–946.
20.
JiangJLiuJ (2022) Penal welfare or penal sovereignty? A political sociology of the recent formalization of Chinese community corrections. Punishment & Society24(4): 501–528.
21.
JiangJSongA (2025) Strong control and weak service: Enforcing drug treatment in China. Journal of Drug Issues55(3): 379–400.
22.
LipskyM (2010) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation.
MalhotraALingS (2020) Contextualising social work autonomy in the Global South: Negotiating constraints and crafting agency. International Social Work63(6): 768–782.
25.
MaoDYuY (2025) Party-building–oriented professionalism: Mechanisms and effects of party-building in social organizations – Analysis based on the ‘China Social Work Dynamic Survey’. Social Construction12(5): 84–111 (in Chinese).
26.
Maynard-MoodySMushenoM (2012) Social equities and inequities in practice: Street level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review72(s1): S16–S23.
27.
NikkuBRRafiqueZ (2019) Empowering people: Role for political social work in South Asia. International Social Work62(2): 877–891.
28.
SolvangIMJuritzenTI (2020) Between empowerment and discipline: Practicing contractualism in social work. Journal of Social Work20(3): 321–339.
29.
SongA (2024) Multiple logics and inconsistent identities of people who use drugs. PKU Journal of Sociology3: 90 (in Chinese).
30.
SongADertadianGCHeJ (2026) Recovery capital in Chinese drug rehabilitation: Exploring person-centred and community-based perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review45(1): e70088.
31.
SongAHeJLiuZ (2025) Systemic neglect hidden behind tolerance: The reproduction of vulnerability among aging heroin users within community-based rehabilitation. Innovation in Aging9(8): igaf066.
32.
SpolanderGMartinL (2012) Successful Project Management in Social Work and Social Care: Managing Resources, Assessing Risks and Measuring Outcomes. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
33.
StoutMLoveJM (2015) Relational process ontology: A grounding for global governance. Administration & Society47(4): 447–481.
34.
WangSB (2024) The integrative construction of social work under the new pattern of Chinese-style modernization. Social Work and Policy19: e70009 (in Chinese).
35.
YanM (2020) Social work, the state, and social governance: Theoretical reflections and Chinese experiences. Social Work4: 4–15 (in Chinese).
36.
ZelizerVA (2000) Fine tuning the Zelizer view. Economy and Society29(3): 383–389.
37.
ZelizerVA (2005) Circuits within capitalism. In: NeeVSwedbergR (eds) The Economic Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press, pp.289–322.
38.
ZengJ (2013) State-led Privatization in China: The Politics of Economic Reform. Routledge.
ZumbansenP (2008) Law after the welfare state: Formalism, functionalism, and the ironic turn of reflexive law. American Journal of Comparative Law56(3): 769–808.
