The Relationship of Key Factors in the Process of Collaboration

Abstract

The relationship of organizational factors thought to influence collaboration in school-to-work coalitions is investigated. Independent variables were identified from previous empirical research on interorganizational collaboration. Quantitative data were collected through structured telephone interviews with key informants from 150 school-to-work partnerships in 16 states. Correlation and regression analyses revealed the extent to which stakeholder diversity, interdependence, written agreements, communication, resource sharing, planning, and coordination were related to the activities and organizational climates of the partnerships. Analyses of the data revealed that planning and coordination were significantly related to stakeholder diversity, resource sharing, written agreements, communication, and interdependence. Stakeholder diversity and resource sharing also were related significantly to activities, and written agreements and communication accounted for significant variance in climate. Interdependence explained variance in both activities and climate. The results provide quantitative support for the importance of a set of key factors in the collaborative processes of coalitions and serve as a starting point for understanding the relationships between these key factors. Implications for collaboration in coalitions and future research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown, C. (1984). The art of coalition building: A guide for community leaders. New York: The American Jewish Committee.

Butterfoss, F., Goodman, R., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8(3), 315-330.

Campion, M., Medsker, G., & Higgs, A. (1993). The relationship between work group characteristics and effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-850.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cummings, T. (1984). Transorganizational development. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Dastmalchian, A., Blyton, P., & Adamson, R. (1989). Industrial relations climate: Testing a construct. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 21-32.

Feighery, E., & Rogers, T. (1989). Building and maintaining effective coalitions (How-To Guides on Community Health Promotion: Guide No. 12). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Health Promotion Resource Center.

Glick, W. (1985). Concepts and measurement of organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multi-level research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601-661.

Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936.

10.

Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Hall, R., Clark, J., Giordano, P., Johnson, P., & Van Roekel, M. (1977). Patterns of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 457-474.

12.

Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. (1974). Organizational climate: Measures, research, and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255-280.

13.

Hord, S. (1986). A synthesis of research on organizational collaboration. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 22-26.

14.

Lawler, E., Hall, D., & Oldham, G. (1974). Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 139-155.

15.

Logsdon, J. (1991). Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 23-37.

16.

McMillan, B., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Kerman, B., & Mitchell, R. (1995). Empowerment praxis in coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 699-728.

17.

Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (9th ed.). (1986). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

18.

Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241-265.

19.

Otterbourg, S., & Timpane, M. (1986). Partnerships and schools. In P. Davis (Ed.), Public-private partnerships: Improving urban life. New York: Academy of Political Science.

20.

Roberts, N., & Bradley, R. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 209-227.

21.

Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Schermerhorn, J. (1979). Interorganizational development. Journal of Management, 5(1), 21-38.

23.

Schmidt, S., & Kochan, T. (1977). Interorganizational relationships: Patterns and motivations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 220-234.

24.

Schnake, M. (1983). An empirical assessment of the effects of affective response in the measurement of organizational climate. Personnel Psychology, 36, 791-807.

25.

Schneider, B., & Snyder, R. (1975). Some relationships between job satisfaction and organizational climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 318-328.

26.

School-to-Work Opportunities Act, 20 U.S.C § 6101 (1994).

27.

Selsky, J. (1991). Lessons in community development: An activist approach to stimulating interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 91-115.

28.

Trist, E. (1983). Referent organizations and the development of inter-organizational domains. Human Relations, 36(3), 269-284.

29.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991). Transition from school to work: Linking education and worksite training. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

30.

Van de Ven, A., & Walker, G. (1984). The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 598-621.

31.

Wood, D., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.