One of the most common problems with composite materials is their low resistance to impacts with foreign objects because of their tendency to dissipate impact energy through internal delamination, weakening a large area of the structure. One of the possible solutions to increase impact resistance is to use of shape memory alloy wires in order to exploit their unique superelastic behaviour and the hysteresis that characterises their stress–strain curves. In this study, composite laminates were hybridised by embedding a network of shape memory alloy within the laminate structure and were subjected to low-velocity impact in order to analyse their response in comparison with a traditional composite. Ultrasonic C-scan analysis was undertaken on the samples after the impact in order to estimate the extension of the internal delamination. Results show that the shape memory alloy wires embedded in the laminate are able to absorb a large amount of energy, reducing the extension of the internal delamination.
MorganRJJurekRJYenA. Toughening procedures, processing and performance of bismaleimide-carbon fibre composites. Polymer1993; 34(4): 835–842.
2.
SainMSuharaPLawS. Interface modification and mechanical properties of natural fiber-polyolefin composite products. J Reinf Plast Compos2005; 24(2): 121–130.
3.
GassanJBledzkiA. Possibilities to improve the properties of natural fiber reinforced plastics by fiber modification–jute polypropylene composites. Appl Compos Mater2000; 7(5–6): 373–385.
4.
HuckerMBondIForemanA. Optimisation of hollow glass fibres and their composites. Adv Compos Lett1999; 8(4): 181–189.
5.
MiyagawaHDrzalLT. Thermo-physical and impact properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by single-wall carbon nanotubes. Polymer2004; 45(15): 5163–5170.
6.
Gou J, O'Braint S, Gu H, et al. Damping augmentation of nanocomposites using carbon nanofiber paper. J Nanomater 2006; 1–7.
7.
ÁvilaAFNetoASNascimento JuniorH. Hybrid nanocomposites for mid-range ballistic protection. Int J Impact Eng2011; 38(8–9): 669–676.
8.
MouritzALeongKHerszbergI. A review of the effect of stitching on the in-plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufac1997; 28(12): 979–991.
9.
AsundiAChoiAYN. Fiber metal laminates: an advanced material for future aircraft. J Mater Process Technol1997; 63(1–3): 384–394.
10.
WuGYangJ-M. The mechanical behavior of GLARE laminates for aircraft structures. JOM2005; 57(1): 72–79.
VogelesangLGunninkJ. ARALL: a materials challenge for the next generation of aircraft. Mater Des1986; 7(6): 287–300.
13.
SunCTDickenAWuHF. Characterization of impact damage in ARALL laminates. Compos Sci Technol1993; 49(2): 139–144.
14.
SongSByunYKuT. Experimental and numerical investigation on impact performance of carbon reinforced aluminum laminates. J Mater Sci Technol2010; 26(4): 327–332.
15.
Meo M, Antonucci E, Duclaux P, et al. Finite element simulation of low velocity impact on shape memory alloy composite plates. Composite structures 2005; 71(3): 337–342.
16.
Pinto F, Maroun FY and Meo M. Material enabled thermography. NDT & E International 2014; 67: 1--9.
17.
Rogers CA and Robertshaw HH. Shape memory alloy reinforced composites. Engineering Science Preprints 25, Society of Engineering Science Inc, ESP25.8027, June 1988.
18.
AngioniSLMeoMForemanA. Impact damage resistance and damage suppression properties of shape memory alloys in hybrid composites—a review. Smart Mater Struct2011; 20(1): 013001–013001.
19.
PaineJSNRogersCA. The response of SMA hybrid composite materials to low velocity impact. J Intell Mater Syst Struct1994; 5(4): 530–535.
20.
BirmanVChandrashekharaKSainS. An approach to optimization of shape memory alloy hybrid composite plates subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos Part B: Eng1996; 27(5): 439–446.
21.
KhaliliSMRShokuhfarAMalekzadehK. Low-velocity impact response of active thin-walled hybrid composite structures embedded with SMA wires. Thin-Walled Struct2007; 45(9): 799–808.
22.
TsoiKAStalmansRSchrootenJ. Impact damage behaviour of shape memory alloy composites. Mater Sci Eng: A2003; 342(1–2): 207–215.
23.
AuricchioFTaylorRLLublinerJ. Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1997; 146(3–4): 281–312.
24.
CorranRShadboltPRuizC. Impact loading of plates—an experimental investigation. Int J Impact Eng1983; 1(1): 3–22.
25.
AbrateS. Impact on composite structures, New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
26.
DiamantiKSoutisC. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Prog Aerospace Sci2010; 46(8): 342–352.
27.
AymerichFMeiliS. Ultrasonic evaluation of matrix damage in impacted composite laminates. Compos Part B: Eng2000; 31(1): 1–6.
28.
MeoMMaruloFGuidaM. Shape memory alloy hybrid composites for improved impact properties for aeronautical applications. Compos Struct2013; 95: 756–766.
