The main hurdles in Vacuum Infusion (VI) are the difficulty in achieving complete mold filling and uniform part thickness. This study integrates process monitoring by full field thickness measurements and resin flow modeling that accounts for compaction and permeability characterizations of fabric reinforcements to assess the evolution of part thickness during filling and post-filling stages of VI process. A Structured Light Scanning system is used for full field thickness monitoring in experiments and a Control Volume Finite Element Method solver is implemented to couple resin flow with fabric’s compaction and permeability. Two cases are studied both experimentally and numerically. Evolutions of thickness and pressure validate the developed flow solver, its accuracy in terms of predicting fill times and fill patterns, suitability and limitations of the elastic compaction models for thickness modeling.
ParkCHWooL.Modeling void formation and unsaturated flow in liquid composite molding processes: a survey and review. J Reinf Plast Compos2011;
30: 957–977.
2.
MichaudV.A review of non-saturated resin flow in liquid composite moulding processes. Transp Porous Med2016;
115: 581–601.
3.
Patiño-ArcilaIDVanegas-JaramilloJD.Modeling and simulation of filling in dual-scale fibrous reinforcements: state of the art and new methodology to quantify the sink effect. J Compos Mater2018;
52: 1915–1946.
4.
KesselsJFAJonkerASAkkermanR.Optimising the flow pipe arrangement for resin infusion under flexible tooling. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007;
38: 2076–2085.
5.
SasHSSimacekPAdvaniSG.A methodology to reduce variability during vacuum infusion with optimized design of distribution media. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
78: 223–233.
6.
NguyenQTVidal-SalléEBoisseP, et al.
Mesoscopic scale analyses of textile composite reinforcement compaction. Compos Part B Eng2013;
44: 231–241.
7.
HammamiAGebartBR.Analysis of the vacuum infusion molding process. Polym Compos2000;
21: 28–40.
8.
KangMKLeeWIHahnHT.Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001;
32: 1553–1560.
9.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC, et al.
Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2005;
36: 1645–1656.
10.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC, et al.
Use of resin transfer molding simulation to predict flow, saturation, and compaction in the VARTM process. J Fluids Eng2004;
126: 210–215.
11.
JoubaudLAchimVTrochuF.Numerical simulation of resin infusion and reinforcement consolidation under flexible cover. Polym Compos2005;
26: 417–427.
12.
BruschkeMAdvaniSG.A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media. Polym Compos1990;
11: 398–405.
13.
AnderssonHMLundströmTSGebartBR, et al.
Application of digital speckle photography to measure thickness variations in the vacuum infusion process. Polym Compos2003;
24: 448–455.
14.
CaglarBYenilmezBSozerEM.Modeling of post-filling stage in vacuum infusion using compaction characterization. J Compos Mater2015;
49: 1947–1960.
15.
SirtautasJPickettAKGeorgeA.Materials characterisation and analysis for flow simulation of liquid resin infusion. Appl Compos Mater2015;
22: 323–341.
16.
ChebilNDeléglise-LagardèreMParkCH.Efficient numerical simulation method for three dimensional resin flow in laminated preform during liquid composite molding processes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019;
125: 105519.
17.
JoshiSC.Reducing loss of resin flowing in porous fibrous media in simulation of composites fabrication. Polym Compos2010;
31: 226–235.
18.
KangMLeeWI.A flow-front refinement technique for the numerical simulation of the resin-transfer molding process. Compos Sci Technol1999;
59: 1663–1674.
19.
SamirJEchaabiJHattabiM.Numerical algorithm and adaptive meshing for simulation the effect of variation thickness in resin transfer molding process. Compos Part B Eng2011;
42: 1015–1028.
20.
GovignonQBickertonSKellyPA.Simulation of the reinforcement compaction and resin flow during the complete resin infusion process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010;
41: 45–57.
21.
YenilmezBSozerEM.Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process, A: characterization experiments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2009;
40: 499–510.
22.
YenilmezBSenanMSozerEM.Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009;
69: 1710–1719.
23.
TackittKWalshSM.Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VARTM process. Mater Manuf Process2005;
20: 607–627.
24.
TuloupCHariziWAbouraZ, et al.
Detection of the key steps during liquid resin infusion manufacturing of a polymer-matrix composite using an in-situ piezoelectric sensor. Mater Today Commun2020;
24: 101077.
25.
YenilmezBAkyolTCaglarB, et al.
Minimizing thickness variation in the vacuum infusion (VI) process. Adv Compos Lett2011;
20: 157–167.
26.
GajjarTShahDBJoshiSJ, et al.
Experimental study of thickness gradient and flow simulation in VARTM process. Fibers Polym2020;
21: 384–391.
27.
LiJZhangCLiangR, et al.
Modeling and analysis of thickness gradient and variations in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. Polym Compos2008;
29: 473–482.
28.
van OosteromSAllenTBattleyM, et al.
An objective comparison of common vacuum assisted resin infusion processes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019;
125: 105528.
29.
YalcinkayaMASozerEM.Effect of part thickness variation on the mold filling time in vacuum infusion process. J Reinf Plast Compos2014;
33: 2136–2150.
30.
GovignonQBickertonSKellyPA.Experimental investigation into the post-filling stage of the resin infusion process. J Compos Mater2013;
47: 1479–1492.
31.
KazmiSMRGovignonQBickertonS.Control of laminate quality for parts manufactured using the resin infusion process. J Compos Mater2019;
53: 327–343.
32.
WuDLarssonRRouhiMS.Modeling and experimental validation of the VARTM process for thin-walled preforms. Polymers (Basel)2019;
11: 2003–2018.
33.
WilliamsCDGroveSMSummerscalesJ.The compression response of fibre-reinforced plastic plates during manufacture by the resin infusion under flexible tooling method. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1998;
29: 111–114.
34.
VilàJGonzálezCLLorcaJ.A level set approach for the analysis of flow and compaction during resin infusion in composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014;
67: 299–307.
35.
HemmerJBurtinCComas-CardonaS, et al.
Unloading during the infusion process: direct measurement of the dual-scale fibrous microstructure evolution with X-ray computed tomography. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018;
115: 147–156.
36.
ChenDArakawaKUchinoM.Effects of the addition of a cover mold on resin flow and the quality of the finished product in vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Polym Compos2016;
37: 1435–1442.
37.
MolimardJNavarroL.Uncertainty on fringe projection technique: a Monte-Carlo-based approach. Opt Lasers Eng2013;
51: 840–847.
38.
LemmensM.A survey on stereo matching techniques. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens1988;
27: 11–23.
39.
PanB.Digital image correlation for surface deformation measurement: historical developments, recent advances and future goals. Meas Sci Technol2018;
29: 082001.
40.
XuJZhangS.Status, challenges, and future perspectives of fringe projection profilometry. Opt Lasers Eng2020; 135:106193. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106193.
41.
WangPDrapierSMolimardJ, et al.
Characterization of liquid resin infusion (LRI) filling by fringe pattern projection and in situ thermocouples. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010;
41: 36–44.
YenilmezB.Vacuum infusion (VI) process modeling and material characterization with viscoelastic compaction models. PhD thesis, Koc University, Turkey, 2014.
47.
YenilmezBCaglarBSozerEM.Pressure-controlled compaction characterization of fiber preforms suitable for viscoelastic modeling in the vacuum infusion process. J Compos Mater2017;
51: 1209–1224.
48.
SousaPLomovSVIvensJ.Methodology of dry and wet compressibility measurement. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2020;
128: 105672.
49.
KellyPAUmerRBickertonS.Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006;
37: 868–873.
50.
Comas-CardonaSLe GrognecPBinetruyC, et al.
Unidirectional compression of fibre reinforcements. Part 1: a non-linear elastic-plastic behaviour. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 507–514.
51.
MayDKühnFEtchellsM, et al.
A reference specimen for compaction tests of fiber reinforcements. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci2019;
5: 230–233.
52.
LoudadRSaouabABeaucheneP, et al.
Numerical modeling of vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding using multilayer approach. J Compos Mater2017;
51: 3441–3452.
53.
ChenBLangEJChouT-W.Experimental and theoretical studies of fabric compaction behavior in resin transfer molding. Mater Sci Eng A2001;
317: 188–196.
54.
VerleyeBWalbranWABickertonS, et al.
Simulation and experimental validation of force controlled compression resin transfer molding. J Compos Mater2011;
45: 815–829.
55.
WalbranWABickertonSKellyPA.Measurements of normal stress distributions experienced by rigid liquid composite moulding tools. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2009;
40: 1119–1133.
56.
YenilmezBSozerEM.Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process: (a) use of characterization database in a model and (b) experiments. J Compos Mater2013;
47: 1959–1975.
57.
YangJXiaoJZengJ, et al.
Compaction behavior and part thickness variation in vacuum infusion molding process. Appl Compos Mater2012;
19: 443–458.
58.
WeitzenböckJRShenoiRAWilsonPA.Radial flow permeability measurement. Part A: theory. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1999;
30: 781–796.
59.
CaglarBOrgéasLRolland Du RoscoatS, et al.
Permeability of textile fabrics with spherical inclusions. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2017;
99: 1–14.
60.
CaglarBSalvatoriDSozerEM, et al.
In-plane permeability distribution mapping of isotropic mats using flow front detection. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018;
113: 275–286.
61.
YalcinkayaMACaglarBSozerEM.Effect of permeability characterization at different boundary and flow conditions on vacuum infusion process modeling. J Reinf Plast Compos2017;
36: 491–504.
62.
AlhusseinHUmerRRaoS, et al.
Characterization of 3D woven reinforcements for liquid composite molding processes. J Mater Sci2016;
51: 3277–3288.
63.
AliMAUmerRKhanKA, et al.
XCT-scan assisted flow path analysis and permeability prediction of a 3D woven fabric. Compos Part B Eng2019;
176: 107320.
64.
HuebnerKHDewhirstDLSmithDE, et al. The finite element method for engineers. 4th ed.
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
65.
ReddyJN.An introduction to the finite element method. 2nd ed.
New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1993.
66.
MaierRSRohalyTFAdvaniSG, et al.
A fast numerical method for isothermal resin transfer mold filling. Int J Numer Meth Engng1996;
39: 1405–1417.
67.
YangBJinTLiJ, et al.
Simulation prediction of the preform deformation and resin flow in vacuum infusion process. Polym Compos2014;
35: 1968–1979.
68.
Di FrattaCKlunkerFTrochuF, et al.
Characterization of textile permeability as a function of fiber volume content with a single unidirectional injection experiment. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015;
77: 238–247.
69.
GeorgeAHannibalPMorganM, et al.
Compressibility measurement of composite reinforcements for flow simulation of vacuum infusion. Polym Compos2019;
40: 961–973.
KhanKAUmerR.Modeling the viscoelastic compaction response of 3D woven fabrics for liquid composite molding processes. J Reinf Plast Compos2017;
36: 1299–1315.
72.
YenilmezBCaglarBSozerEM.Viscoelastic modeling of fiber preform compaction in vacuum infusion process. J Compos Mater2017;
51: 4189–4203.
