This study examines whether locus and importance of causal attributions for poverty mediate effects of gender and political ideology on attitudes toward social welfare provision. The study also examines whether cultural differences moderate effects of causal attributions on attitudes toward social provision. Analyses of data from 14 cultures (N = 4,018) showed a positive relationship between importance of external causes of poverty and support for social provision of basic needs and a negative relationship between the internal causes and the support for social provision. Political conservatives, in particular men, ascribed less responsibility to government for need provision than did liberals. The ideological differences were partially mediated by external and internal attributions, whereas gender differences were mediated by external attributions. Not only did culture moderate effects of causal attributions, cultural differences in support of social provision were also partially but extremely differently (e.g., United States vs. Ireland) mediated by causal attributions
Anderson, C. A. (1999). Attributional style, depression, and loneliness: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Chinese students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 482-499.
2.
Anker, R. (1997). Theories of occupational segregation by sex: An overview. International Labour Review, 136, 315-339.
3.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Biel, A., Eek, D., & Gärling, T. (1997). Distributive justice and willingness to pay for municipality child care. Social Justice Research, 10, 63-80.
5.
Chandler, T. A., Shama, D. D., Wolf, F. M., & Planchard, S. K. (1981). Multiattributional causality: A five cross-national samples study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 207-221.
6.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63.
7.
Deaux, K., & Farris, E. (1977). Attributing causes for one’s performance: The effects of sex, norms, and outcome. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 59-72.
8.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Eek, D., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (2000). Willingness to contribute to the finance of public social services. In M. van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. R. Tyler, & A. Biel (Eds.), Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states and organizations (pp. 195-209). London: Routledge.
11.
Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (2000). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845-852.
12.
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Frieze, I. H., Whitley, B. E., Jr., Hanusa, B. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1982). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 8, 333-343.
14.
Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685-694.
16.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
17.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708-713.
19.
Harvey, J. H., Town, J. P., & Yarkin, K. L. (1981). How fundamental is “the fundamental attribution error”?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 346-349.
20.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Higgins, N. C., & Shaw, J. K. (1999). Attributional style moderates the impact of causal controllability information on helping behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 221-236.
22.
Hine, D. W., & Montiel, C. J. (1999). Poverty in developing nations: A cross-cultural attributional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 943-959.
23.
Ichheiser, G. (1943). Misinterpretations of personality in everyday life and the psychologist’s frame of reference. Character and Personality, 12, 145-160.
24.
Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 55(Part 2), 1-70.
25.
Jacobs, J. A. (1999). The sex segregation of occupations: Perspectives for the 21st century. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 125-141). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
28.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
30.
Kluegel, J. R. (1990). Trends in Whites’ explanations of the Black-White gap in socioeconomic status, 1977-1989. American Sociological Review, 55, 521-525.
31.
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ view of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
32.
Kouabenan, D. R., Gilbert, D., Médina, M., & Bouzon, F. (2001). Hierarchical position, gender, accident severity, and causal attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 553-575.
33.
Krull, D. S., Loy, M. H.-M., Lin, J., Wang, C.-F., Chen, S., & Zhao, X. (1999). The fundamental attribution error: Bias in individualist and collectivist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1208-1219.
34.
Lewis, J. (1997). Gender and welfare regimes: Further thoughts. Social Politics, 4, 160-177.
35.
McHugh, M. C., Frieze, I. H., & Hanusa, B. H. (1982). Attributions and sex differences in achievement: Problems and new perspectives. Sex Roles, 8, 467-479.
36.
Orloff, A. S. (Ed.). (1997). A discussion of gender and welfare regimes [Special section]. Social Politics, 4, 157-207.
37.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
38.
Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593-607.
39.
Quinn, K. A., Ross, E. M., & Esses, V. M. (2001). Attributions of responsibility and reactions to affirmative action: Affirmative action as help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 321-331.
40.
Rice, J. K. (2001). Poverty, welfare, and patriarchy: How macro-level changes in social policy can help low-income women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 355-374.
41.
Roos, P. A., & Gatta, M. L. (1999). The gender wage gap in earnings: Trends, explanations, and prospects. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 95-123). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Ross, L. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Ross, L. D., & Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
44.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
Sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure: A current assessment [Special issue]. (1982). Sex Roles, 8(4).
46.
Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). The interrelationships between political ideology and public opinion. In M. Herman (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 62-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Sohn, D. (1982). Sex differences in achievement self-attributions: An effect-size analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 345-357.
48.
Statistics Sweden. (1998). Statistical yearbook of Sweden 1999, Vol. 85. Stockholm: Author.
49.
Sweeney, P. D., Moreland, R. L., & Gruber, K. L. (1982). Gender differences in performance attributions: Students’ explanations for personal success or failure. Sex Roles, 8, 359-373.
50.
Tetlock, P. E., & Levi, A. (1982). Attribution bias: On the inclusiveness of the cognitive-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 68-88.
51.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
52.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
53.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
54.
Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95-120). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
