To explore the possible cognitive consequences of biculturalism, the authors examine the complexity of cultural representations in monocultural and bicultural individuals. Study 1 found that Chinese American biculturals' free descriptions of both American and Chinese cultures are higher in cognitive complexity than that of Anglo-American monoculturals, but the same effect was not apparent in descriptions of culturally neutral entities (landscapes). With the same procedures, Study 2 found that the cultural representations of biculturals with low levels of Bicultural Identity Integration (BII; or biculturals with conflicted cultural identities) are more cognitively complex than that of biculturals with high BII (biculturals with compatible cultural identities). This article shows that cultural frame switching and BII have meaningful cognitive consequences; furthermore, it suggests that exposure to more than one culture may increase individuals' ability to detect, process, and organize everyday cultural meaning, highlighting the potential benefits of multiculturalism.
Abe, H., & Weisman, R. L. (1983). A cross-cultural confirmation of the dimensions of intercultural effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations7, 53-67.
2.
Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and socio-personality antecedents. Journal of Personality73, 1015-1049.
3.
Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame-switching in biculturals with ‘oppositional’ vs. ‘compatible’ cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology33, 492-516.
4.
Berry, J. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In N. R. Goldberger & J. B. Veroff (Eds.), The culture and psychology reader (pp. 457-488). New York: New York University Press. (Reprinted from Nebraska symposium on motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives, by J. J. Berman, Ed., 1989, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press)
5.
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M., & Bujaki, M. (1989). Acculturation attitudes in plural societies. Applied Psychology: An International Review38, 185-206.
6.
Berry, J., & Sam, D. (1996). Acculturation and adaptation. In J. Berry, M. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Social behavior and applications (Vol. 3, pp. 291-325). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development,70, 636-644.
8.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. M., Klein, R., Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290-303.
9.
Botvinick, M., Braver, T., Barch, D., Carer, C., & Cohen, J. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624-652.
10.
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L., Fissell, K., Carter, C., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring vs. selection-foraction in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
11.
Burleson, B. R., & Caplan, S. E. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, & M. M. Martin (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 230-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
12.
Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1990). Effects of cognitive complexity on the perceived importance of communication skills in friends. Communication Research, 17, 165-182.
13.
Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Carringer, D. (1974). Creative thinking abilities of a Mexican youth: The relationship of bilingualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 492-504.
15.
Dunning, D., & Story, A. (1991). Depression, realism, and the overconfidence effect: Are the sadder wiser when predicting future actions and events?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 521-532.
16.
Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (1997). Expertise in context: Human and machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Fowers, B. J., & Richardson, F. C. (1996). Why is multiculturalism good?American Psychologist, 6, 609-621.
18.
Frable, D. (1993). Dimensions of marginality: Distinctions among those who are different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 370-380.
19.
Gardner, W., Gabriel, S., Dean, K. (2004). The individual as “melting pot”: The flexibility of bicultural self-construals. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 181-201.
20.
Gutierrez, J., & Sameroff, A. (1990). Determinants of complexity in Mexican-American and Anglo-American mothers' conceptions of child development. Child Development, 61, 384-394.
21.
Gutierrez, J., Sameroff, A., & Karrer, B. M. (1988). Acculturation and SES effects on Mexican-American parents' concepts of development. Child Development, 59, 250-255.
22.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Bristol, PA: The Open University.
23.
Haritatos, J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2002). Bicultural identities: The interface of cultural, personality, and socio-cognitive processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 6, 598-606.
24.
Hermans, H., & Kempen, H. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problem of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120.
25.
Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.). (1992). The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI. New York: Springer.
26.
Hong, Y. Y., Benet-Martínez, V., Chiu, C., & Morris, M. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453-464.
27.
Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
28.
Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: the contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5-11.
29.
LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395-412.
30.
Lau-Gesk, L. G. (2003). Activating culture through persuasion appeals: An examination of the bicultural consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 301-315.
31.
Lee, F., & Peterson, C. (1997). Content analysis of archival data. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 65(6), 959-969.
32.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
33.
Menasco, M. B. (1976). Experienced conflict in decision-making as a function of level of cognitive complexity. Psychological Reports, 39, 923-933.
34.
Meyer, D., & Kieras, D. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomenon. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
35.
Miller, H., & Bieri, J. (1965). Cognitive complexity as a function of the significance of the stimulus objects being judged. Psychological Reports, 16, 1203-1204.
36.
Morris, M., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
37.
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R., Tesser, A., & Borkowski, W. (2000). Society of self: The emergence of collective properties in self-structure. Psychological Review, 107, 39-61.
38.
Park, B., & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance-versus abstractionbased stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621-635.
39.
Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean?American Psychologist, 51(9), 918-927.
40.
Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D., & Evans, J. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
41.
Rudmin, F. W. (2003). Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Review of Psychology, 7, 3-37.
42.
Ryder, A., Alden, L., & Paulhus, D. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 49-65.
43.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
44.
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 68-74.
45.
Suedfeld, P., & Bluck, S. (1993). Changes in integrative complexity accompanying significant life events: Historical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 124-130.
46.
Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S., Loewen, L., & Elkins, D. (1994). Sociopolitical values and integrative complexity of members of student political groups. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 26, 121-141.
47.
Suedfeld, P., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Health outcomes and cognitive aspects of recalled negative life events. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 172-177.
48.
Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393-400). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Suedfeld, P., & Wallbaum, A. B. (1992). Modifying integrative complexity in political thought: Value conflict and audience disagreement. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 19-36.
50.
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
51.
Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R., & Lerner, J. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In C. Seligman, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Ontario symposium on social and personality psychology: Values (pp. 25-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Toth, J. P., & Reingold, R. M. (1996). Beyond perception: Conceptual contributions to unconscious influences of memory. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
Tripodi, T., & Bieri, J. (1966). Cognitive complexity, perceived conflict, and certainty. Journal of Personality, 34, 144-153.
54.
Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y., & Lee, P. A. (2000). The meaning of “being Chinese” and “being American”: Variation among Chinese American young adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 302-322.
55.
U.S. Census. (2002). Principal demographic results. Retrieved March 3, 2003, from http://www.census.gov.
56.
Van der Zee, K., & Van der Gang, I. (2005). Individual differences in reactions to cultural diversity under threat: The generalizability of the anxiety buffer hypothesis. Poster presented at the 6th annual convention of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
57.
Van der Zee, K., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2001). The multicultural personality questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 278-288.
58.
Woll, S. (2002). Everyday thinking: Memory, reasoning, and judgment in the real world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
