The New Benchmarking and Advisory State: The Role of the British Advisory,Conciliation and Arbitration Service in Facilitating Labour—Management Consultation in Public Sector Transformation
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online November, 2008
The New Benchmarking and Advisory State: The Role of the British Advisory,Conciliation and Arbitration Service in Facilitating Labour—Management Consultation in Public Sector Transformation
The aim of this article is to examine the changing role of the state in a more market-driven system of industrial relations, specifically in terms of the new roles that are being developed with regard to mediation, advisory and arbitration services. It focuses empirically on the role played by the British Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service in facilitating the modernization of public sector employment relations. We show how the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service has played a `benchmarking' role that assists the development of more strategic forms of decision-making and cooperation in employment relations change, and identify the challenges of developing such an approach in the context of the shift towards a more decentralized and market-oriented system of public service delivery. In conclusion we assert that there is a new `advisory and benchmarking' state evolving based on a soft-market view of industrial relations, and that this mitigates (but is also in tension with) the harder market view within the state concerned with transforming the public sector.
Acas (2006) ACAS Annual Report and Accounts 2005/6 HC 1239. London : The Stationery Office.
2.
Bach, S. (2002) `Public Sector Employment Relations Reform under Labour: Muddling through on Modernization?' , British Journal of Industrial Relations40(2): 319-39.
3.
Bach, S. (2004) `Employee Participation and Union Voice in the National Health Service' , Human Resource Management Journal14(2): 3-19.
4.
Berger, S. and Compston, H. (eds) (2002) Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
5.
Brown, W. (2004) `Third Party Intervention Reconsidered: An International Perspective' , Journal of Industrial Relations46(4): 448-58.
6.
Crouch, C. (2003) `The State: Economic Management and Incomes Policy' , in P. Edwards (ed.) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn, pp. 105-23. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
Davies, P. and Freedland, M. (1993) Labour Legislation and Public Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8.
Dix, G. and Oxenbridge, S. (2004) `Coming to the Table with Acas: From Conflict to Cooperation' , Employee Relations26(5): 510-30.
9.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2000) `Who is harmed by Labour Market Regulations?: Quantitative Evidence', in G. Esping-Anderson and M. Regini (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?, pp. 66-98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Fonstad, N.O. , McKersie, R.B. and Eaton, S.C. (2004) `Interest-based Negotiations in a Transformed Labour-Management Setting' , Negotiation Journal20(1): 5-11.
12.
Hall, S. (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal. London : Verso.
13.
Hawes, W. (2000) `Setting the Pace or Running Alongside?: ACAS and the Changing Employment Relationship', in B. Towers and W. Brown (eds) Employment Relations in Britain: 25 years of the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service, pp. 1-30. London: Blackwell.
14.
Herod, A. (2001) `Labour Internationalism and the Contradictions of Globalisation: Or, why the Local is Sometimes Still Important in a Global Economy', in P. Waterman and J. Wills (eds) Place, Space and the New Labour Internationalisms, pp. 101-22. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
Jessop, B. (2002a) `Liberalism, Neo-liberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-theoretical Perspective' , Antipode34(3): 425-72.
16.
Jessop, B. (2002b) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
Koch, M. (2005) `Wage Determination, Socio-economic Regulation and the State' , European Journal of Industrial Relations11(3): 327-46.
18.
Kochan, T.A. (2006) `Adapting Industrial Relations to Serve Knowledge-based Economies' , Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 7-20.
19.
Kochan, T.A. and Osterman, P. (1994) The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labour, Management and Government. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance. London : SAGE.
21.
Leisink, P. and Hyman, R. (2005) `Introduction: The Dual Evolution of Europeanization and Varieties of Governance' , European Journal of Industrial Relations11(3): 277-86.
22.
MacKenzie, R. and Martínez Lucio, M. (2005) `The Realities of Regulatory Change: Beyond the Fetish of Deregulation' , Sociology39(3): 499-517.
23.
Martínez Lucio, M. and MacKenzie, R. (2004) `Unstable Boundaries?: Evaluating the "New Regulation" within Employment Relations' , Economy and Society33(1): 77-97.
24.
Martínez Lucio, M. and Stuart, M. (2000) `Assessing Partnership: The Prospects for and Challenges of Modernisation' , Employee Relations24(3): 252-61.
25.
Martínez Lucio, M. and Stuart, M. (2007) `Sustaining New Industrial Relations in the Public Sector: The Politics of Trust and Cooperation in the Context of Organizational Dementia and Disarticulation', in P. Dibben , P. James , I. Roper and G. Wood (eds) Modernising Work in the Public Sector, pp. 139-52. London: Macmillan.
26.
Martínez Lucio, M. and Weston, S. (2000) `European Works Councils and "Flexible Regulation": The Politics of Intervention' , European Journal of Industrial Relations6(2): 203-16.
27.
Purcell, J. (2000) `After Collective Bargaining: ACAS in the Age of Human Resource Management', in B. Towers and W. Brown (eds) Employment Relations in Britain: 25 Years of the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service, pp. 163-80. London: Blackwell .
28.
Regini, M. (2000) `The Dilemmas of Labour Market Regulation', in G. Esping-Anderson and M. Regini (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?, pp. 11-29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Seeber, R.L. and Lipsky, D.B. (2006) `The Ascendancy of Employment Arbitrators in US Employment Relations: A New Actor in the American System?' , British Journal of Industrial Relations44(4): 719-56.
30.
Stuart, M. and Martínez Lucio, M. (2000) `Renewing the Model Employer: Changing Employment Relations and Partnership in the Health and Private Sectors' , Journal of Management in Medicine14(5-6): 310-25.
31.
Stuart, M. and Martínez Lucio, M. (2005a) Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
32.
Stuart, M. and Martínez Lucio, M. (2005b) `ACAS in the NHS: Helping improve employment relations in response to Agenda for Change', Research Paper 06/05. London: ACAS.
33.
Towers, B. and Brown, W. (eds) (2000) Employment Relations in Britain: 25 Years of the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service. London: Blackwell.
34.
Van der Meer, M. , Visser, J. and Wilthagen, T. (2005) `Adaptive and Reflexive Governance: The Limits of Organized Decentralization' , European Journal of Industrial Relations11(3): 347-65.
35.
Van Gramberg, B. (2006) `The Rhetoric and Reality of Workplace Alternative Dispute Resolution' , Journal of Industrial Relations48(2): 175-91.
36.
Visser, J. (1998) `Two Cheers for Corporatism: One for the Market' , British Journal of Industrial Relations36(2): 269-92.
