Facing competitive and commoditization threats, many companies shift to solution offerings, albeit with mixed results. With a qualitative analysis of dyadic data (suppliers and customers), this article investigates an important, often overlooked reason for such mixed outcomes: the complex, dynamic role of governance matching. This study identifies a series of tensions arising from solution-specific exchange conditions and the matched governance mechanisms actors use to address them: temporary asset colocation, network closure, knowledge-based boundary objects, rights allocation agreements, and liaison champions. It also reveals the dynamic nature of governance matching. Solutions evolve in three phases—experimentation, integration, and evolution—in which single mechanisms have different functions (safeguarding and/or coordination), provide contingent and transient benefits, and can be used in combination to address complex tensions. This study also identifies two decision points, mutual commitment and balanced power, that separate the three phases; their outcomes help explain why certain solution efforts do not take off, others stall, and still others revert to mere spot exchanges. Beyond contributing to solutions literature, these findings provide actionable insights to marketing managers.
AndersonErinWeitzBarton (1992), “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1), 18–34.
2.
AndersonJames C.HåkanssonHåkanJohansonJan (1994), “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 1–15.
3.
BainesTimBigdeliAli ZiaeeBustinzaOscar F.ShiVictor GuangBaldwinJamesRidgewayKeith (2017), “Servitization: Revisiting the State-of-the-Art and Research Priorities,” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37 (2), 256–78.
4.
BarneyJay B.OuchiWilliam G. (1986), Organizational Economics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BonomaThomas V. (1985), “Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (2), 199–208.
6.
BradachJeffrey L.EcclesRobert G. (1989), “Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms,” Annual Review of Sociology, 15 (1), 97–118.
CannonJoseph P.AchrolRavi S.GundlachGregory T. (2000), “Contracts, Norms, and Plural Form Governance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 180–94.
9.
CaoZhiLumineauFabrice (2015), “Revisiting the Interplay Between Contractual and Relational Governance: A Qualitative and Meta-Analytic Investigation,” Journal of Operations Management, 33/34 (January), 15–42.
10.
CarlilePaul R. (2002), “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development,” Organization Science, 13 (4), 442–55.
11.
CornelissenJoep P. (2017), “From the Editors: Developing Propositions, a Process Model or a Typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory Without a Boilerplate,” Academy of Management Review, 42 (1), 1–9.
12.
CusumanoMichael A.KahlSteven J.SuarezFernando F. (2015), “Services, Industry Evolution, and the Competitive Strategies of Product Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 36 (4), 559–75.
13.
DavisJames F.SchoormanDavidDonaldsonLex (1997), “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management,” Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), 20–47.
14.
DayGeorge S. (2011), “Closing the Marketing Capabilities Gap,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 183–95.
EisenhardtKathleen (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–50.
17.
FangEric (Er)PalmatierRobert W.SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2008), “Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (5), 1–14.
18.
ForkmannSebastianHennebergStephan C.WitellLarsKindströmDaniel (2017), “Driver Configurations for Successful Service Infusion,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (3), 275–91.
19.
FriendScott B.MalsheAvinash (2016), “Key Skills for Crafting Customer Solutions Within an Ecosystem: A Theories-in-Use Perspective,” Journal of Service Research, 19 (2), 174–91.
20.
GhoshMrinalJohnGeorge (1999), “Governance Value Analysis and Marketing Strategy,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 131–45.
21.
GhoshMrinalJohnGeorge (2005), “Strategic Fit in Industrial Alliances: An Empirical Test of Governance Value Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (3), 346–57.
GioiaDennis A.CorleyKevin G.HamiltonAimee L. (2012), “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology,” Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 15–31.
GundlachGregory T.CadotteErnest R. (1994), “Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (4), 516–32.
26.
HallénLarsJohansonJanSeyed-MohamedNazeem (1991), “Interfirm Adaptation in Business Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (2), 29–37.
27.
HartmannNathaniel N.WielandHeikoVargoStephen L. (2018), “Converging on a New Theoretical Foundation for Selling,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (2), 1–18.
28.
HeideJan B. (1994), “Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channel,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 71–85.
29.
HeideJan B.JohnGeorge (1990), “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 24–36.
30.
HeideJan B.WathneKenneth H. (2006), “Friends, Business People, and Relationship Roles: A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 90–103.
31.
HernandezExequielSandersGerard W.TuschkeAnja (2015), “Network Defense: Pruning, Grafting, and Closing to Prevent Leakage of Strategic Knowledge to Rivals,” Academy of Management Journal, 58 (4), 1233–60.
32.
HirschmannAlbert O. (1980), “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Further Reflections and a Survey of Recent Contributions,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 58 (3), 430–53.
33.
HoetkerGlennMellewigtThomas (2009): “Choice and Performance of Governance Mechanisms: Matching Alliance Governance to Asset Type,” Strategic Management Journal, 30 (10), 1025–44.
34.
Blankenburg HolmDesiréeErikssonKentJohansonJan (1999), “Creating Values Through Mutual Commitment to Business Network Relationships,” Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5), 467–86.
35.
JapSandy D.AndersonErin (2007), “Testing a Life-Cycle Theory of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships: Movement Across Stages and Performance,” Management Science, 53 (2), 260–75.
36.
JapSandy D.GanesanShankar (2000), “Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 227–45.
37.
KlagMalvinaLangleyAnn (2013), “Approaching the Conceptual Leap in Qualitative Research,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 15 (2), 149–66.
38.
KowalkowskiChristianGebauerHeikoOlivaRogelio (2017), “Service Growth in Product Firms: Past, Present, and Future,” Industrial Marketing Management, 60 (1), 82–88.
39.
KowalkowskiChristianUlagaWolfgang (2017), Service Strategy in Action: A Practical Guide for Growing Your B2B Service and Solution Business. Scottsdale, AZ: Service Strategy Press.
40.
KreyeMelanie E. (2017), “Can You Put Too Much on Your Plate? Uncertainty Exposure in Servitized Triads,” Journal of Operations and Product Management, 37 (12), 1722–40.
41.
KumarNirmalyaScheerLisa K.SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (1995), “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (3), 348–56.
42.
Leonard-BartonDorothy (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal, 13 (S1), 111–25.
43.
LitchfieldRobert C.GentryRichard J. (2010), “Perspective-Taking as an Organizational Capability,” Strategic Organization, 8 (3), 187–205.
44.
MacdonaldEmma K.KleinaltenkampMichaelWilsonHugh N. (2016), “How Business Customers Judge Solutions: Solution Quality and Value in Use,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 96–120.
45.
MacneilIan R. (1980), The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46.
MastenScott E.MeehanJames W.SnyderEdward A. (1991), “The Costs of Organization,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7 (1), 1–25.
MohrJakki J.FisherRobert J.NevinR. (1996), “Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (3), 103–15.
49.
MorseJanice M.BarrettMichaelMayanMariaOlsonKarinSpiersJude (2002), “Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2), 13–22.
50.
NarayandasDasKasturi RanganV. (2004), “Building and Sustaining Buyer-Seller Relationships in Mature Industrial Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 63–77.
51.
NeelyAndy (2008), “Exploring the Financial Consequences of the Servitization of Manufacturing,” Operations Management Research, 1 (2), 103–18.
52.
NezamiMehdiWormStefanPalmatierRobert (2018), “Disentangling the Effect of Services on B2B Firm Value: Trade-Offs of Sales, Profits, and Earnings Volatility,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35 (2), 205–23.
53.
NickersonJackson A.ZengerTodd R. (2004), “A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm: The Problem-Solving Perspective,” Organization Science, 15 (6), 617–22.
54.
PalmatierRobert W.DantRajiv P.GrewalDhruv (2007), “A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (4), 172–94.
PoppoLauraZengerTodd (2002), “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?” Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8), 707–25.
57.
PriorDaniel D. (2016), “Incorporating Exchange Governance in Service-Dominant Logic: Lessons from Transaction Cost Economics,” Marketing Theory, 16 (4), 553–60.
58.
ReadStuartDewNicholasSarasvathySaras D.SongMichaelWiltbankRobert (2009), “Marketing Under Uncertainty: The Logic of an Effectual Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (3), 1–18.
59.
ReimWiebkeSjödinDavidParidaVinit (2018), “Mitigating Adverse Customer Behaviour for Product-Service System Provision: An Agency Theory Perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, 74 (October), 150–61.
60.
RosaJosé AntonioPoracJoseph F.Runser-SpanjolJelenaSaxonMichael S. (1999), “Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 64–77.
61.
SawhneyMohanbir (2006), “Going Beyond the Product: Defining, Designing, and Delivering Customer Solutions,” in The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, LuschRobertVargoSteven, eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 365–80.
62.
ScheerLisa C.MiaoFredPalmatierRobert (2014), “Dependence and Interdependence in Marketing Relationships: Meta-Analytic Insights,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (6), 694–712.
StraussAnselm L.CorbinJuliet (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
65.
TuliKapilKohliAjayBharadwajSundar G. (2007), “Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 1–17.
66.
UlagaWolfgangKohliAjay (2018), “The Role of a Solutions Salesperson: Reducing Uncertainty and Fostering Adaptiveness,” Industrial Marketing Management, 69 (February), 161–68.
67.
UlagaWolfgangReinartzWerner (2011), “Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (6), 5–23.
68.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2016), “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 5–23.
69.
WathneKennethHeideJan (2000), “Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 36–51.
70.
WathneKennethHeideJan (2004), “Relationship Governance in a Supply Chain Network,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 73–89.
71.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organizations: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269–96.
72.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1998), “Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works, Where It Is Headed,” De Economist, 146 (1), 23–58.
73.
WormStefanBharadwajSundar G.UlagaWolfgangReinartzWerner J. (2017), “When and Why Do Customer Solutions Pay Off in Business Markets?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (4), 490–512.
74.
YinRobert K. (2014), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
75.
ZhangJonathan Z.Watson IVGeorge F.PalmatierRobert W.DantRajiv P. (2016), “Dynamic Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (5), 53–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
