Market share can influence perceived quality through several different mechanisms, including signaling, creating network externalities, and inclusion as an attribute in consumers’ quality functions. The direction of this potential effect is ambiguous. Making use of data on 85 different brands across 28 product categories, the authors explore the effect market share has on consumers’ perceptions of quality and the extent to which category-wide and brand-specific factors moderate this effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity.New York: The Free Press.
2.
AakerDavid A. and JacobsonRobert (1994), “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 191–210.
3.
ArthurW. Brian (1996), “Increasing Returns and the New World of Business,” Harvard Business Review, 74 (July/August), 100–109.
4.
AndersonEugene W., FornellClaes, and LehmannDonald R. (1994), “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (July), 53–66.
5.
BeckerGary S. (1991), “A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price,” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (October), 1109–16.
6.
BouldingWilliam, KalraAjay, StaelinRichard, and ZeithamlValarie (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), 7–27.
7.
BuzzellRobert and WiersemaFrederik (1981), “Modeling Changes in Market Share: A Cross-Sectional Analysis,” Strategic Management Journal, 2 (January-March), 27–42.
8.
CaminalRamon and VivesXavier (1996), “Why Market Shares Matter: An Information-Based Theory,” Rand Journal of Economics, 27 (Summer), 221–39.
9.
DayGeorge S., ShockerAllan D., and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1979), “Customer-Orientated Approaches to Identifying Product Markets,” Journal of Marketing, 43 (Fall), 8–19.
10.
FornellClaes (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experiment,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 6–21.
11.
FornellClaes (1995), “The Quality of Economic Output: Empirical Generalizations About Its Distribution and Relationship to Market Share,” Marketing Science, 14 (3), G203–11.
KirmaniAmna and WrightPeter (1989), “Money Talks: Perceived Advertising Expense and Expected Product Quality,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (December), 344–53.
20.
LiebowitzS.J. and MargolisStephen E. (1994), “Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (Spring), 133–50.
21.
MonroeKent B. and KrishnanR. (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Perceived Quality: How Customers View Stores and Merchandise, JacobyJacob and OlsonJerry C., eds. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath and Co., 209–32.
22.
NaughtonKeith (1997), “Taurus May Tumble from the Top,” BusinessWeek, (January 20), 4.
23.
PorterMichael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy.New York: The Free Press.
24.
RustRoland T. and OliverRichard L. (1994), “Service Quality: Insights and Managerial Implications from the Frontier,” in Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, RustRoland T. and OliverRichard L., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1–20.
25.
ScitovskyT. (1945), “Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price,” The Review of Economic Studies, 12 (32), 100–105.
26.
SherifM. and HovlandC.I. (1961), Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
SmallwoodDennis and ConliskJohn (1979), “Product Quality in Markets Where Consumers Are Imperfectly Informed,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93 (February), 1–23.
28.
VishwanathVijay and MarkJonathan (1997), “Your Brand's Best Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, 75 (May/June), 123–29.
29.
ZeithamlValarie (1988), “Consumers Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), 2–22.
