User-generated content has become ubiquitous and very influential in the marketplace. Increasingly, this content is generated on smartphones rather than personal computers (PCs). This article argues that because of its physically constrained nature, smartphone (vs. PC) use leads consumers to generate briefer content, which encourages them to focus on the overall gist of their experiences. This focus on gist, in turn, tends to manifest as reviews that emphasize the emotional aspects of an experience in lieu of more specific details. Across five studies—two field studies and three controlled experiments—the authors use natural language processing tools and human assessments to analyze the linguistic characteristics of user-generated content. The findings support the thesis that smartphone use results in the creation of content that is less specific and privileges affect—especially positive affect—relative to PC-generated content. The findings also show that differences in emotional content are driven by the tendency to generate briefer content on smartphones rather than user self-selection, differences in topical content, or timing of writing. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
ArbuckleJames L. (2014), Amos (Version 23.0)[Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
2.
BanerjeeSnehasishChuaAlton Y.K. (2014), “A Study of Manipulative and Authentic Negative Reviews,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
3.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
4.
BergerJonahIyengarRaghuram (2013), “Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 567–79.
5.
BergerJonahMilkmanKatherine L. (2012), “What Makes Online Content Viral?” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (2), 192–205.
6.
BianchiAdrianaPhillipsJames G. (2005), “Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8 (1), 39–51.
7.
BrainerdCharles J.ReynaValerie F. (1990), “Gist is the Grist: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and the New Intuitionism,” Developmental Review, 10 (1), 3–47.
8.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
9.
ChungCindy M.Y.DarkePeter R. (2006), “The Consumer as Advocate: Self-Relevance, Culture, and Word-of-Mouth,” Marketing Letters, 17 (4), 269–79.
DoddsPeter SheridanDanforthChristopher M. (2010), “Measuring the Happiness of Large-Scale Written Expression: Songs, Blogs, and Presidents,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 11 (4), 441–56.
12.
DuboisDavidBonezziAndreaAngelisMatteo De (2016), “Sharing with Friends Versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 712–27.
13.
EastRobertHammondKathyWrightMalcolm (2007), “The Relative Incidence of Positive and Negative Word of Mouth: A Multi-Category Study,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2), 175–84.
14.
GhoseAnindyaGoldfarbAviHanSang Pil (2013), “How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities,” Information Systems Research, 24 (3), 613–31.
15.
GhoseAnindyaHanSang Pil (2011), “An Empirical Analysis of User Generated Content and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet,” Management Science, 57 (9), 1671–91.
16.
GhoseAnindyaIpeirotisPanagiotis G. (2011), “Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23 (10), 1498–1512.
17.
GodesDavidMayzlinDina (2004), “Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication,” Marketing Science, 23 (4), 545–60.
18.
GodesDavidMayzlinDina (2009), “Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test,” Marketing Science, 28 (4), 721–39.
19.
HardingSueCookeMartinKonigPeter (2007), “Auditory Gist Perception: An Alternative to Attentional Selection of Auditory Streams?” in International Workshop on Attention in Cognitive Systems. Berlin: Springer.
20.
Lau-GeskLoraineMeyers-LevyJoan (2009), “Emotional Persuasion: When the Valence Versus the Resource Demands of Emotions Influence Consumers’ Attitude,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (4), 585–99.
21.
LiJessyNenkovaAni (2015), “Fast and Accurate Prediction of Sentence Specificity,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2281–87.
22.
LudwigStephande RuyterKoFriedmanMikeBrüggenElisabeth C.WetzelsMartinPfannGerard (2013), “More Than Words: The Influence of Affective Content and Linguistic Style Matches in Online Reviews on Conversion Rates,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 87–103.
23.
LuminetI.V. OlivierBoutsPatrickDelieFrédériqueMansteadAntony S.R.RiméBernard (2000), “Social Sharing of Emotion Following Exposure to a Negatively Valenced Situation,” Cognition & Emotion, 14 (5), 661–88.
24.
MelumadShiriPhamMichel T. (2018), “Understanding the Psychology of Smartphone Usage: The Adult Pacifier Hypothesis,” working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
25.
MetcalfeJanetMischelWalter (1999), “A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower,” Psychological Review, 106 (1), 3.
26.
OlivaAude (2005), “Gist of the Scene,” in Neurobiology of Attention, LaurentIttiReesGeraintTsotsosJohn K., eds. New York: Elsevier, 251–56.
27.
OsgoodCharles E. (1962), “Studies on the Generality of Affective Meaning Systems,” American Psychologist, 17 (1), 10–28.
28.
PaulhusDelroy L.LimDavid T.K. (1994), “Arousal and Evaluative Extremity in Social Judgment: A Dynamic Complexity Model,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 24 (1), 89–99.
29.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKaylaBlackburnKate (2015), LIWC 2015: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, http://www.liwc.net/.
PhamMichel T. (1998), “Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (2), 144–59.
32.
PhamMichel TuanCohenJoel B.PracejusJohnDavid HughesG. (2001), “Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (2), 167–88.
33.
PhamMichel T.Faraji-RadAliToubiaOlivierLeeLeonard (2015), “Affect as an Ordinal System of Utility Assessment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132, 81–94.
34.
PietersRikWedelMichelSmithRobert H. (2012), “Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation,” Marketing Science, 31 (1), 59–73.
35.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,” Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36 (4), 717–31.
36.
RaghunathanRajagopalPhamMichel Tuan (1999), “All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness in Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71 (1), 56–77.
37.
RansbothamSamLurieNicholas H.LiuHongju (2018), “Creation and Consumption of Mobile Word-of-Mouth: How Are Mobile Reviews Different?” Marketing Science, forthcoming.
38.
RaptisDimitriosTseliosNikolaosKjeldskovJesperSkovMikael B. (2013), “Does Size Matter? Investigating the Impact of Mobile Phone Screen Size on Users’ Perceived Usability, Effectiveness and Efficiency,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 127–36.
39.
ReynaValerie F. (2012), “A New Intuitionism: Meaning, Memory, and Development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory,” Judgment and Decision Making, 7 (3), 332–59.
40.
RiversSusan E.ReynaValerie F.MillsBritain (2008), “Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence,” Developmental Review, 28 (1), 107–44.
41.
SchellekensGaby A.CVerleghPeeter W.JSmidtsAle (2010), “Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 207–23.
42.
SlatcherRichard B.PennebakerJames W. (2006), “How Do I Love Thee? Let Me Count the Words,” Psychological Science, 17 (8), 660–64.
43.
StephenAndrew T.PhamMichel T. (2008), “On Feelings as a Heuristic for Making Offers in Ultimatum Negotiations,” Psychological Science, 19 (10), 1051–58.
44.
SundaramDinesh S.MitraKaushikWebsterCynthia (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, AlbaJoseph W.Wesley HutchinsonJ., eds. Provo, UT: 527–31.
WangChih-ChienChouFeng-ShaChenChiao-ChiehYangYann-Jy (2015), “Negativity Bias Effect in Helpfulness Perception of Word-of-Mouths: The Influence of Concreteness and Emotion,” in International Conference on Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research, 425–36.
47.
ZajoncRobert J. (1980), “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,” American Psychologist, 35 (2), 151–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
