In the past, marketing research has largely been restricted to tactical questions. However, with the advent of new techniques, marketing research can contribute directly to the development of strategic alternatives to current product marketing plans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradleyM. E. and TerryR. A. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: The Method of Paired Comparisons,” Biometrika, 39 (1952), 324–45.
2.
CarrollJ. D. “Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling,” Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1969.
3.
GuttmanLouis. “A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Space for a Configuration of Points,” Psychometrika, 33 (December1968), 469–506.
4.
JohnsonRichard M. “Multiple Discriminant Analysis,” unpublished paper, Workshop on Multivariate Methods in Marketing, University of Chicago, 1970.
5.
JohnsonRichard M. “Political Segmentation,” paper presented at Spring Conference on Research Methodology, American Marketing Association, New York, 1969.
6.
JohnsonStephen C. “Hierarchial Clustering Schemes,” Psychometrika, 32 (September1967), 241–54.
7.
KruskalJoseph B. “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis,” Psychometrika, 29 (March1964), 1–27.
8.
KruskalJoseph B. “Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method,” Psychometrika, 29 (June1964), 115–29.
9.
LuceR. D. “A Choice Theory Analysis of Similarity Judgments,” Psychometrika, 26 (September1961), 325–32.
10.
McKeonJames J. “Canonical Analysis,” Psychometric Monographs, 13.
11.
TuckerLedyard. “Dimensions of Preference,” Research Memorandum RM-60–7, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1960.
12.
YoungF. W. “TORSCA, An IBM Program for Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August1968), 319–21.
13.
YoungG. and HouseholderA. S. “Discussion of a Set of Points in Terms of Their Mutual Distances,” Psychometrika, 3 (March1938), 19–22.
