Durable goods buyers’ prepurchase information search activities were studied to determine whether distinctive patterns of information source usage could be identified. A method based on canonical analysis of retail, neutral, and personal source usage measures in conjunction with selected explanatory variables proved useful in distinguishing four different patterns. Tradeoffs were evident in the usage of and reliance on different information sources. The results emphasize the need for further study of consumer information need and information-gathering abilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassFrank M., TigertDouglas J., and LonsdaleRonald T. (1974), “Market Segmentation: Group Versus Individual Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (August), 264–70.
2.
BettmanJames R. and JacobyJacob (1976), “Patterns of Processing in Consumer Information Acquisition,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. III, AndersonBeverlee B., ed. Cincinnati: Association for Consumer Research, 315–20.
3.
BettmanJames R. and KakkarPradeep (1977), “Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (March), 233–40.
4.
ClaxtonJohn D., FryJoseph N., and PortisBernard (1974), “A Taxonomy of Prepurchase Information Gathering Patterns,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (December), 35–43.
5.
FornellClaes (1978), “Problems in the Interpretation of Canonical Analysis: The Case of Power in Distributive Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 489.
6.
FrankRonald E. and StrainCharles E. (1972), “A Segmentation Research Design Using Consumer Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November), 385–90.
7.
HempelDonald J. (1969), “Search Behavior and Information Utilization in the Home Buying Process,” in Marketing Involvement in Society and the Economy, McDonaldP. R., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 241–9.
8.
HughesG. David and MichaelL. Ray, eds. (1974), Buyer / Consumer Information Processing. Chapei Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
9.
JohanssonJohny K., and ShethJagdish N. (1977), “Canonical Correlation and Marketing Research,” in Multivariate Methods for Market and Survey Research, ShethJ. N., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 111–31.
10.
KatonaGeorge and MuellerEva (1955), “A Study of Purchase Decisions,” in Consumer Behavior: The Dynamics of Consumer Reaction, Vol. 1, ClarkLincoln H., ed. New York: Harper.
11.
LambertZarrel V. and DurandRichard M. (1975), “Some Precautions in Using Canonical Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November), 468–75.
12.
MorrisonDonald G. (1973), “Evaluating Market Segmentation Studies: The Properties of” R2, Management Science, 19 (July), 1213–21.
13.
NewmanJoseph W. (1977), “Consumer External Search: Amount and Determinants,” in Consumer and Organizational Buying Behavior, WoodsideA. G., BennettD., and ShethJ. N., eds. New York: Elsevier-North Holland, 79–94.
14.
NewmanJoseph W. and LockemanBradley D. (1975), “Measuring Prepurchase Information Seeking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (December), 216–22.
15.
NewmanJoseph W. and StaelinRichard (1973), “Information Sources of Durable Goods,” Journal of Advertising Research, 13 (April), 19–29.
16.
NewmanJoseph W. and StaelinRichard (1972), “Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (August), 249–57.
17.
StewartD. K. and LoveW. A. (1968), “A General Canonical Correlation Index,” Psychological Bulletin, 70, 160–3.
18.
WilkieWilliam F. (1975), Consumer Use of Product Information. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
