The author investigates the effect of grammatical variations in telephone prenotification and interviewer/respondent gender interaction on mail survey response rate, speed, quality, and bias. The four experimental grammatical forms were expected to differ in the amount of pressure they seem to exert on the respondent to comply. Findings suggest that rhetorical elicitation modes in the pre-call/mail survey setting influence response rate and speed, particularly for female interviewers, and do not affect response quality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenChris T., ScheweCharles D., and WijkGösta (1980), “More on Self-Perception Theory's Foot Technique in the Pre-Call/Mail Survey Setting,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 498–502.
2.
BailarBarbara, and BaileyLeroy, and StevensJoyce (1977), “Measures of Interviewer Bias and Variance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(August), 337–43.
3.
BallouJanice, and DelBocaFrances K. (1980), “Gender Interaction Effects on Survey Measures in Telephone Interviews,” presented at the 35th Annual Conference, American Association for Public Opinion Research, Mason, Ohio (May).
4.
BorgIngwer (1977), “Some Basic Concepts of Facet Theory,” in Geometric Representations of Relational Data, LingoesJ. C., ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 65–101.
5.
CannellCharles F., and OksenbergLois, and ConverseJean M. (1977), “Experiment in Interviewing Techniques: Field Experiments in Health Reporting, 1971–1977,” NCHSR Research Report Series.
6.
CantorJoanne R. (1979), “Grammatical Variations in Research,”Communication Monograph, 46, 296–305.
7.
ChildersTerry L., PrideWilliam M., and FerrellO. C. (1980), “A Reassessment of the Effects of Appeals on Response to Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(August), 365–70.
8.
ClarkHerbert H., and PeterLucy (1975), “Understanding What is Meant From What is Said: A Study in Conversational Conveyed Requests,”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 56–72.
9.
ClydeH., and BordonR., and GiesenM., and MurrayE. J., and SeyfreedB. A. (1972), “Effectiveness of Ingratiation Tactics in a Cover Letter on Mail Questionnaire,”Psychonomic Science, 26, 349–51.
10.
ColombotosJohn, and ElinsonJack, and LoewensteinRegina (1968), “Effect of Interviewer Sex on Interview Responses,”Public Health Report, 83, 685–90.
11.
ColombotosJohn, and FreyJames H. (1974), “Contribution of Personalizatvion to Mail Questionnaire Response as an Element of a Previously Tested Method,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 297–301.
12.
DillmanDon A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13.
EastlackJoseph O., and AssaelHenry (1966), “Better Telephone Surveys Through Centralized Interviewing,”Journal of Advertising Research, 6, 2–7.
14.
Ervin-TrippSusan (1976), “Speech Acts and Social Learning,” in Meaning in Anthropology, BassoKeith H., and SelbyHenry A., eds. University of New Mexico Press, 123–53.
15.
FeldtL. S., and MahmondM. W. (1958), “Power Function Charts for Specification of Sample Size,”Psychometrika, 23, 201–10.
16.
FreemanJohn, and ButlerEdgar W. (1976), “Some Sources of Interviewer Variance in Surveys,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 79–91.
17.
GuttmanLouis (1959), “Introduction to Facet Design and Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Psychology.Brussels: North Holland Publishers.
18.
HansenRobert A. (1980), “A Self-Perception Interpretation of the Effect of Monetary and Nonmonetary Incentives on Mail Survey Respondent Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(February), 77–83.
19.
HornikJacob (1981a), “Comparative Effectiveness of Four Modes of Telephone Prenotification on Refusals to a Mail Questionnaire,” in Proceedings of the European Academy for Advanced Research in Marketing, LarsonHanne, and HeedeSyren, eds. Copenhagen (March), 77–96.
20.
HornikJacob (1981b), “Time-Cue and Time Perception Effect on Response Behavior to Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(May) 243–8.
21.
HoustonMichael J., and FordNeil M. (1976), “Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November), 397–3.
22.
JolsonMarvin A. (1977), “How to Double or Triple Mail Survey Response Rate,”Journal of Marketing, 41, 78–81.
23.
LinskyArnold S. (1975), “Stimulating Responses to Mail Questionnaires: A Review,”Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 82–101.
24.
MillerL. (1977), “Dyadic Perception of Communicator Style: Replication and Confirmation,”Communication Research, 4, 87–112.
25.
NeterJohn, and WassermanWilliam (1974), Applied Linear Statistical Models.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
26.
ParksMalcolm (1977), “Relational Communication: Theory and Research,”Human Communication Research, 3, 372–81.
27.
RogerT. F. (1976), “Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Response and Field Performance,”Psychological Bulletin, 84, 852–77.
28.
StaffordJ. E. (1966), “Influence of Preliminary Contact on Mail Return,”Journal of Marketing Research, 3(November), 410–11.
29.
ZillmanDolf (1972), “Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 150–65.
