A consumer's prior evaluation of an advertised brand is hypothesized to moderate the effectiveness of humor in advertising. Further, cognitive responses are hypothesized as mediators of the impact of humorous ads on brand attitude. The results support the hypothesized moderator role of prior brand evaluation: when prior evaluation of the advertised brand is positive, a humorous ad is more effective than its nonhumorous counterpart in changing consumer attitudes and choice behavior. When consumers have a negative prior attitude, the opposite is true: a humorous ad is less effective in changing consumer attitudes and choice behavior than its nonhumorous counterpart. The results also support the conceptualization of cognitive responses as mediators of the impact of humorous advertisements on brand attitude.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.
2.
BurkeMarian C., and EdellJulie (1989), “The Impact of Feeling on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (February), 69–83.
3.
CacioppoJohn, and PettyRichard E. (1979), “The Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Responses, Recall, and Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97–109.
4.
ChattopadhyayAmitava, and AlbaJoseph W. (1988), “The Situational Importance of Recall and Inference in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (June), 1–11.
5.
CohenJacob (1977), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, rev. ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
6.
DuncanCalvin P. (1979), “Humor in Advertising: A Behavioral Perspective,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7 (Fall), 285–306.
7.
DuncanCalvin P., and NelsonJames E. (1985), “Effects of Humor in a Radio Advertising Experiment,”Journal of Advertising, 14 (2), 33–40.
8.
FrenchCarey (1988), “Does a Smile Sell the Product?”The Globe and Mail (March 19), D5.
9.
GelbBetsy D., and ZinkhanGeorge M. (1986), “Humor and Advertising Effectiveness After Repeated Exposures to a Radio Commercial,”Journal of Advertising, 15 (2), 15–20.
10.
GoldbergMarvin E., and GornGerald J. (1987), “Happy and Sad TV Programs: How They Affect Reactions to Commercials,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 387–403.
11.
HershkowitzAaron (1977), “The Essential Ambiguity of, and in, Humour,” in It's a Funny Thing Humour, ChapmanA. J., and FootH. C., eds. New York: Pergamon Press, 139–42.
12.
JohnsonRichard M. (1981), “Market Segmentation: A Strategic Management Tool,” in Marketing Classics, 4th ed. EnisB. M., and CoxK. K., eds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc., 317–27.
13.
KrugmanHerbert E. (1972), “Why Three Exposures May Be Enough,”Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (December), 11–14.
14.
LammersBruce, LeibowitzLaura, SeymourGeorge, and HennesseyJudith (1983), “Humor and Cognitive Reponses to Advertising Stimuli: A Trace Consolidation Approach,”Journal of Business Research, 11 (June), 173–85.
15.
LeventhalHoward, and SaferMartin A. (1977), “Individual Differences, Personality and Humour Appreciation: Introduction to Symposium,” in It's a Funny Thing Humour, ChapmanA. J., and FootH. C., eds. New York: Pergamon Press335–50.
16.
MacKenzieScott B., LutzRichard J., and BelchGeorge E. (1986), “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (May), 130–43.
17.
MaddenThomas J., and WeinbergerMarc C. (1982), “The Effects of Humor on Attention in Magazine Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 11 (3), 8–14.
18.
MaddenThomas J., and WeinbergerMarc C. (1984), “Humor in Advertising: A Practitioner View,”Journal of Advertising Research, 24 (4) 23–9.
19.
MarkiewiczDorothy (1974), “Effects of Humor on Persuasion,”Sociometry, 37 (3), 407–22.
20.
MurrayRaphel (1987), “Leave the Funny Business to Comedians,”Bank Marketing, 19 (May), 26–7.
21.
OrkinDick (1985), “Humor Takes the ‘Ho-Hum’ Out of Radio Ads,”Marketing News, 19 (June 7), 23.
22.
PettyRichard E., and CacioppoJohn (1985), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, BerkowitzL., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc.123–205.
23.
ShamaAvraham, and CoughlinMaureen (1979), “An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Humor in Advertising,” in Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series 44, BeckwithNeil, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 249–52.
24.
SpeckPaul (1987), “On Humor and Humor in Advertising,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
25.
StaymanDouglas M., and AakerDavid A. (1988), “Are All the Effects of Ad-Induced Feelings Mediated by Aad?”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (December), 368–73.
26.
SternthalBrian, and CraigSamuel C. (1973), “Humor in Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 37 (October), 12–18.
27.
WeinbergerMarc C., and DillonWilliam R. (1980), “The Effects of Unfavorable Product Rating Information,” in Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 7, OlsonJerry C., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 528–32.
28.
ZillmanDolf (1983), “Disparagement Humor,” in Handbook of Humor Research: Basic Issues, Vol. 1, McGheeP. E., and GoldsteinJ. H., eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 85–108.
