Playing it Safe as a Novice Teacher

Abstract

Prompted by the continuing attrition rate of novice teachers, this study examines 1st-year teachers’ needs in the context of a university-regional partnership sponsored support program for novice teachers, the Novice Teacher Support Project (NTSP). Using the concept of reality shock as occurring in the interaction of person and environment, the authors examined novice teachers’ expressed needs and how those needs are met. Throughout all the findings, the novice teachers expressed a need for safety, a mix of support and challenge that was best provided by a combination of both internal resources from the district and external resources such as the NTSP. The authors suggest conceptualizing support as an interactive process that includes person, school context, support context, and personal relationships. This can help support the creation of the type of emotionally and professionally safe environments new teachers need to develop their professional lives.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birrell, J. (1995). Learning how the game is played: An ethnically encapsulated beginning teacher’s struggle to prepare Black youth for a White world. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 137-147.

Bullough, R. V. (1989). First year teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.

Clift, R. T. , Veal, M. L. , Holland, P. , Johnson, M. , & McCarthy, J. (1995). Collaborative leadership and shared decision making: Teachers, principals, and university professors. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cole, A. , & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Shattered images: Understanding expectations and realities of field experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 457-471.

Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association for Bilingual Education.

Fox, S. M. , & Singletary, T. J. (1986). Deductions about supportive induction. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 12-13.

Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.

Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal? Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Holland, P. E. , Clift, R. T. , & Veal, M. L. (1992). Linking pre-service and in-service supervision through professional inquiry. In C. D. Glickman (Ed.), Supervision in transition: The 1992 ASCD Yearbook. Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

10.

The Holmes Group . (1995). A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.

11.

Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 173-180.

12.

Klug, B. J. , & Sultzman, S. A. (1991). Formal induction vs. informal mentoring: Comparative effects and outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 241-251.

13.

Lipman, P. (1997). Restructuring in context: A case study of teacher participation and the dynamics of ideology, race, and power. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 3-38.

14.

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future . (1996). Summary report: What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author.

15.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

16.

Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. White Plains, NY: Longman.

17.

Odell, S. J. , & Huling, L. (Eds.). (2000). Quality mentoring for novice teachers. Washington, DC: Association of Teacher Educators/Indianapolis, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.

18.

Reiman, A. J. , & Parramore, B. (1994). First-year teachers’ assignments, expectations, and development: A collaborative investigation. In M. O’Hair & S. Odell (Eds.), Partnerships in education. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

19.

Schmidt, M. , & Knowles, J. G. (1995). Four women’s stories of “failure” as beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 429-444.

20.

Sleeter, C. E. , & Grant, C. A. (1988). Making choices for multi-cultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender. New York: Macmillan.

21.

U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (Rep. No. OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

22.

Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.

23.

Who should teach? Quality Counts 2000. (2000, January 13). Education Week [Online]. Available: http://www.edweek.org

24.

Wilkinson, G. A. (1994). Support for individualizing teacher induction. Action in Teacher Education, 16, 52-61.