Supporting student teachers in learning to teach is a collaborative effort by mentor teachers, teacher education supervisors, and student teachers. Each of the participants appraises effort and progress in learning to teach from different perspectives, however. This study explores how practice lessons are assessed by multiple raters. Teacher educators, mentor teachers, and student teachers (51 participants in total) were asked to appraise a practice lesson given by the mentored student. Alignment in rating was analyzed in 17 triads and compared with respect to purpose of assessment, object of appraisal, preferred methods, and focus of the appraisal as well as on the criteria used by the various assessors. Shared problems encountered during the appraisal were also gauged. Our findings indicate considerable variation in purposes and multiple perspectives in criteria among the different assessors. Differences and similarities among the stakeholders were interpreted as contributing to a multifaceted appraisal of accomplishments. Nevertheless, a shared, common ground is also needed to value the different aspects that should be included in an integrated or encompassing approach for assessment of learning to teach.
Abernathy, T., Forsyth, A., & Mitchell, J. (2001). The bridge from student to teacher: What principals, teacher education faculty and students value in a teaching applicant. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4), 109-119.
2.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge , UK: University of Cambridge, School of Education .
3.
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk
4.
Assessment Reform Group (2006). In J. Gardner, Assessment and learning, London: Sage.
5.
Atwater, L.E., & Brett, J.F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360 degree feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 532-548.
6.
Baum, T. (2002). Skills and training for the hospitality sector: A review of issues. Journal of Vocational Education and Training , 54(3), 343-363.
7.
Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31-43.
8.
Ben-Peretz, M. (2001). The impossible role of teacher educators in a changing world. Teacher Education, 52(1), 48-56.
9.
Bennett, R.E., & Ward, W.C. (1993). Construction vs. choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in performance testing and portfolio assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3-29). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
11.
Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers , F. Dochy, & E. Cascalar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment, in search of qualities and standards (pp. 13-36). Dordrecht , Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
12.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74.
13.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529-549.
14.
Boshuizen, H.P.A., Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (2004). Professional Learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
15.
Bovair, S., & Kieras, D.E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Brown, S., & Glasner, A. (1999). Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches. Buckingham, UK: SRHE/Open University Press.
17.
Butler, D.L., & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
18.
Byham, W.C. (1996). What is an assessment center: Method, application and technologies. Los Angeles: Development Dimensions International.
19.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M.K. (2002). The discourse of reform in teacher education: Extending the dialogue. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 26-28.
20.
Dall'Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383-412.
21.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives , 8(1), 23-36.
22.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2004). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
23.
Day, C. (1999). Professional development of teachers. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
24.
Delandshere, G., & Arens, S.A. (2003). Examining the quality of the evidence in pre-service teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 57-73.
25.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331-350.
26.
Edwards, A., & Collison, J. (1996). Mentoring and developing practice in primary schools . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
27.
Edwards, A., Gilroy, P., & Hartley, D. (2002). Rethinking teacher education: Collaborative responses to uncertainty. London: Routledge Falmer.
28.
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, spots and games. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge Falmer.
30.
Feiman Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1996). Perspectives on learning to teach. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook (pp. 63-91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Fisher, C.F. & King, R.M. (1995). Authentic assessment, a guide to implementation . Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
32.
Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. London: Routledge.
33.
Guskey, T., & Bailey, J. (2001). Developing grades and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin .
34.
Gijbels, D., Watering, G. van de, Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationships between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327-341.
35.
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer.
36.
Grossman, P. (2006). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 425-476). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Havnes, A., & McDowell, L. (Eds.). (2007). Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education. London: Routledge Research in Education.
38.
Heilbronn, R., Jones, C., Bubb, S., & Totterdell, M. (2002). School-based induction tutors: A challenging role. School Leadership and Management , 22(4), 34-45.
39.
Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1998). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. London: Routledge.
40.
Jellema, F. (2003). Measuring training effects: The potential of 360-degree feedback. Doctoral dissertation, Twente University, Enschede, Netherlands.
41.
Kirby, J.R., Knapper, C.K., Evans, C.J., Carty, A.E., & Gadula, C. (2003). Approaches to learning at work and workplace climate . International Journal of Training and Development, 7(1), 31-52.
42.
Kremer-Hayon, L., & Tillema, H.H. (1999). Self-regulated learning in the context of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(5), 507-522.
43.
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teachers Education, 19, 149-170.
44.
Landy, F.J., & Farr, J.L. (1983). The measurement of work performance. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Lievens, F. (1998). Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(3), 141-152.
46.
Loughran, J. (2003, June). Knowledge construction and learning to teach . Keynote address delivered to the conference of the International Association of Teachers and Teaching, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
47.
Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12-20.
48.
MacLelland, E. (2004). How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29, 311-321.
49.
Maurer, T.J., Mitchell, R.D., & Barbeite, F.G. (2002). Predicators of attitude towards 360-degree feedback system and involvement of post-feedback management development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 75, 87-102.
50.
McMillan, J. (2007). Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice . New York: Teachers College Press .
51.
Nijveldt, M. (2007). Validity in teacher assessment: An exploration of the judgment processes of assessors. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
52.
Redman, W. (1994). Portfolios for development: A guide for trainers and managers. London: Kogan Page .
53.
Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory . Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-85.
54.
Shephard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
55.
Shute, V.J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
56.
Smith, K. & Tillema, H.H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. ScandiJournal of EducaResearch. 41(2), 193-205.
57.
Smith, K. (2006). The function of modelling: Teacher educators as assessors, students as assessees. In P. Frenkel & K. Smith (Eds.), How to assess what? Functions of assessment in teacher education (pp. 46-67). Tel Aviv, Israel: Tema, Mofet Institute.
58.
Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 625-648.
59.
Snyder, J., Lippincott, A., & Bower, D. (1998). The inherent tensions in the multiple uses of portfolios in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly , 25(1), 45-60.
60.
Thornow, W.W. (1993). Perception or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? Human Resource Management, 32, 221-230.
61.
Tillema, H.H. & Smith, K. (2007). Portfolio assessment: In search of criteria. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 442-456.
62.
Tomlinson, P. & Saunders, S. (1995). The current possibilities for competence profiling in teacher education. In Edwards, A. and Knight, P. (Eds.) The Assessment of Competence in Higher Education, London: Kogan Press.
63.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 66, 249-276.
64.
Tigelaar, D.E., Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., & van der Vleuten, C. (2002). The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48(2), 253-268.
65.
Uhlenbeck, A.M., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2002). Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 242-272.
66.
Waldman, D.A., & Atwater, L.A. (1998). The power of 360-degree feedback: How to leverage performance evaluations for top productivity. Houston, TX: Gulf.
67.
Wang, J., & Odell, S.J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research , 72(3), 481-546.
68.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
Wilson, S.M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development . Review of Research in Education, 24, 173-209.
70.
Wilson, S.M., & Youngs, P. (2005). Research on accountability processes in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 591-645). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
Yinger, R.J. & Hendricks-Lee, M.S. (1998). Professional development standards as a new context for professional development in the US teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 4(2), 273 - 298.
72.
Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2000). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613-621.
73.
Zuzowsky, R., & Libman, Z. (2002, August). Standards of teaching performance and teacher tests: Where do they lead us?Paper presented at the conference of ATEE, Warsaw, Poland.
