The effect of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science on their classroom practice was exam ined. Three science teachers were interviewed to elucidate their understanding of science and science teaching. To make connections between their thinking about science and their actions in teaching science, each teacher's classes were observed for at least 35 hours. The teachers differed in their views of the nature of scientific theories, scientific processes, and the progression and change of scientific knowledge. Teachers' beliefs about science influenced not only explicit lessons about the nature of science, but also shaped an implicit curriculum concerning the nature of scientific knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brickhouse, N.W. (1989). The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: Case studies of teachers' personal theories. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4) , 437-449.
2.
Brickhouse, N.W. , & Bodner, G.M. (in press). The beginning science teacher. Narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
3.
Brown, H.I. (1977). Perception, theory, and commitment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/M.I.T. Press.
5.
Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
Duschl, R.A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision-making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467-502.
7.
Earth Science. (1986). Morristown , NJ: Silver Burdett Ginn.
8.
Goetz, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Harlen, W., & Symington, D. (1985). Helping children to observe. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science : Taking the plunge (pp. 21-35). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
Hawkins, J., & Pea, R.D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 24, 291-308.
11.
Hewitt, P.G. (1971). Conceptual physics. Boston : Little Brown.
12.
Hollon, R.E., & Anderson, C.W. (1987, April). Teachers' beliefs about students learning processes in science: Self-reinforcing belief systems . Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
15.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNeil, L.M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (W. Mays, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1970)
22.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
23.
Schwab, J.J. (1968). The concept of the structure of a discipline. In L. J. Hebert & W. Murphy (Eds.), Structure in the social studies (pp. 43-56). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies .
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching . Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
26.
Smith, E.L., & Anderson, C.W. (1984). Plants as producers: A case study of elementary science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(7), 685-698.
27.
Toulmin, S.E. (1982). The construal of reality: Criticism in modern and postmodern science. Critical Inquiry, 9, 93-111.
