The Social and the Individual in Language

Abstract

The behaviourist view of language, which reduces it to a system of stimuli and responses, is too limited, since it leaves out of account the function of apprehension (prise de conscience). Language embodying socially accumulated and generalised experience reflects the phenomena of the surrounding world in the human mind in the form of consciousness. Thus, consciousness is a form of reflection which is social by nature. It is inconceivable without the mastery of language.

At the same time “speech capacity”, i.e. the mastery of language, is determined by inborn psycho-physiological mechanisms common to all human beings. The relation between language as a social and a psychological phenomenon is dynamic, revealing itself in mutual transformations. Individual language is not an “imprint” of the objective system, as F. de Saussure believed it to be, but a product of its active reconstruction.

To analyse this relation it is necessary to investigate the process of transformation of the objective phenomena of social language into individual, and that of the transformation of individual-psychological formations into phenomena of social consciousness. The process of mastery of language is important because the only real existence of language not only as a form of individual consciousness but also as a form of social consciousness is its existence in the minds of real individuals.

These transformations are due to the fact that the laws which govern the phenomena change just as the laws change when phenomena studied by one science are transformed into phenomena studied by another.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BAUDOUIN DE COURTENAY, I. A. (1893). Vermenschlichung der Sprache (Hamburg).

Baudouin De Courtenay, I. A. (1905). Concerning one of the aspects of gradual humanization of language in the field of pronunciation in connection with anthropology. Year-Book of the Russian Anthropologist Society, Petersburg University, 1.

BLOOMFIELD, L. (1933). Language (New York).

ENGELS, F. (1934). Herrn Eugen Dührings Umwälzung der Wissenschaft (Moscow-Leningrad).

FIRTH, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934-51 (London).

HOCKETT, C. F. (1955). A Manual of Phonology (Baltimore).

KOMAROV, V. L. (1944). The Theory of Species in Plants (Moscow).

LEONTIEV, A. N. and LEONTIEV, A. A. (1959). The double aspect of phenomena of language. Papers of the Higher School. Philosophical Sciences, no. 2.

Leontiev, A. N. (1959). The historical principle of psychology. In Psychological Science in the U.S.S.R., Vol. 1 (Moscow).

10.

MARX, K. (1844). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. In K. Marx and F. Engels, Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe, 1-ste Abteilung, Bd. 3 (Berlin, 1932).

11.

ROGINSKY, Y. Y. and LEVIN, M. G. (1955). Fundamentals of Anthropology (Moscow).

12.

SAPIR, E. (1921). Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech (New York).

13.

DE SAUSSURE, F. (1922). Cours de linguistique générale (Paris).

14.

SHCHERBA, L. V. (1956). On the threefold aspect of phenomena of language and on experimentation in linguistics. Reading-book on the History of Linguistics in the XIXth and XXth Centuries (Moscow).

15.

SMIRNITSKY, A. I. (1957). The Syntax of the English Language (Moscow).

16.

Weinreich, U. (1953). Review of J. B. Carroll, The Study of Language. Word, 9, 27.