How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time,Cross-National Analysis

Abstract

Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important.

Keywords

issue ownership parties voters comparative analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Somer-Topcu

(2009) Do Parties Adjust Their Policies in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts? Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 825–846.

Andersen

(2003) The General Election in Denmark, November 2001. Electoral Studies 22 (1): 186–193.

Arndt

(2014) Beating Social Democracy on Its Own Turf: Issue Convergence as Winning Formula for the Centre-Right in Universal Welfare States. Scandinavian Political Studies 37 (2): 149–170.

Bale

(2003) Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems. West European Politics 26 (3): 67–90.

Baumgartner

Jones

Wilkerson

(2011) Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. Comparative Political Studies 44 (8): 947–972.

Belanger

(2003) Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties 1953–2001. Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 539–558.

Blomqvist

Green-Pedersen

(2004) Defeat at Home? Issue-Ownership and Social Democratic Support in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 587–613.

Brasher

(2009) The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations. Party Politics 15 (1): 69–92.

Budge

(1994) A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology, and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 443–467.

10.

Budge

Farlie

(1983) Party Competition. Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data. In: Daalder

Mair

(eds) West European Party Systems: Continuity & Change. London: SAGE Publishing, pp. 267–305.

11.

Busemeyer

Franzmann

Garritzmann

(2013) Who Owns Education? Cleavage Structures in the Partisan Competition over Educational Expansion. West European Politics 36 (3): 521–546.

12.

Camp

Walgrave

Lefevere

. (2015) Measuring Issue Ownership with Survey Questions. A Question Wording Experiment. Electoral Studies. Available from: https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.001 (accessed 23 May 2016).

13.

Carmines

(1991) The Logic of Party Alignments. Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 (1): 65–80.

14.

Clarke

Sanders

Stewart

. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Dahlberg

Martinsson

(2015) Changing Issue Ownership through Policy Communication. West European Politics 38 (4): 817–838.

16.

Dalton

Wattenberg

(2002) Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Damore

(2004) The Dynamics of Issue Ownerships in Presidential Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly 57: 391–397.

18.

Davidsson

Marx

(2013) Losing the Issue, Losing the Vote: Issue Competition and the Reform of Unemployment Insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies 61 (3): 505–522.

19.

Dolezal

Ensser-Jedenastik

Muller

. (2013) How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory. European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 57–76.

20.

Downs

(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

21.

Egan

(2013) Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Green

Hobolt

(2007) Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies 27: 460–476.

23.

Green

Jennings

(2012) Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Great Britain. British Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 311–343.

24.

Green-Pedersen

(2007) The Growing Importance of Issues. Political Studies 55 (4): 608–628.

25.

Hibbs

(1977) Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 71 (4): 1467–1487.

26.

Holian

(2004) He’s Stealing My Issues! Clinton’s Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership. Political Behaviour 26 (2): 95–124.

27.

Kleinnijenhuis

Walter

(2014) News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level versus Stability at the Macro Level. The International Journal of Press/Politics 19 (2): 226–245.

28.

Klingemann

H-D

Hofferbert

Budge

(1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

29.

Lefevere

Tresch

Walgrave

(2015) Introduction: Issue Ownership. West European Politics 38 (4): 755–760.

30.

Meguid

(2008) Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359.

31.

Meguid

Belanger

(2008) Issue Salience, Issue Ownership and Issue-Based Vote Choice. Electoral Studies 27 (3): 477–491.

32.

Petrocik

(1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.

33.

Pope

Woon

(2009) Measuring Changes in American Party Reputations, 1939–2004. Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 653–661.

34.

Riker

(1996) The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

35.

Robertson

(1976) A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.

36.

Schattschneider

(1960) The Semisovereign People. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.

37.

Spoon

J-J

Hobolt

De Vries

(2013) Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research 53 (2): 363–380.

38.

Stubager

Slothuus

(2013) What Are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level. Political Behaviour 35 (3): 567–588.

39.

Taggart

(1998) A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 33 (3): 363–388.

40.

Therriault

(2015) Whose Issue Is It Anyway? A New Look at the Meaning and Measurement of Issue Ownership. British Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 929–938.

41.

Tresch

Lefevere

Walgrave

(2013) ‘Steal Me If You Can!’: The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 30 January. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812472576.

42.

Van der Brug

(2004) Issue Ownership and Party Choice. Electoral Studies 23: 209–233.

43.

Van Kersbergen

(1995) Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.

44.

Volkens

Lehmann

Merz

. (2014) The Manifesto Data Collection: Manifesto Project. Berlin: WZB.

45.

Walgrave

Lefevere

Tresch

(2012) The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 771–782.

46.

Walgrave

Tresch

Lefevere

(2015) The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership. West European Politics 38 (4): 778–796.

47.

Whiteley

Clarke

Sanders

. (2013) Affluence, Austerity and Electoral Change in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Wright

(2012) Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage. American Political Science Review 106 (4): 685–702.