Research on issue ownership is accelerating and so is its use in studies of voting and party behaviour. Yet we do not know how stable issue ownership is. Does it describe a solid, persistent association between a party and an issue in the eyes of the electorate, or does it describe a more fluid and fragile issue reputation of a party among the electorate? Theoretical and empirical work suggests both stability and variability in issue ownership. To get closer to an answer, this article presents and analyses unprecedented comprehensive data on issue ownership. The analysis identifies stability rather than change in issue ownership over time and similarity more than difference across countries, and therefore suggests that issue ownership is a general and long-term rather than a local and short-term phenomenon. The implications for how voters perceive parties are important.
AdamsJSomer-TopcuZ (2009) Do Parties Adjust Their Policies in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts? Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Democracies. British Journal of Political Science39 (4): 825–846.
2.
AndersenJ (2003) The General Election in Denmark, November 2001. Electoral Studies22 (1): 186–193.
3.
ArndtC (2014) Beating Social Democracy on Its Own Turf: Issue Convergence as Winning Formula for the Centre-Right in Universal Welfare States. Scandinavian Political Studies37 (2): 149–170.
4.
BaleT (2003) Cinderella and Her Ugly Sisters: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe’s Bipolarising Party Systems. West European Politics26 (3): 67–90.
5.
BaumgartnerFJonesBWilkersonJ (2011) Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics. Comparative Political Studies44 (8): 947–972.
6.
BelangerE (2003) Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties 1953–2001. Canadian Journal of Political Science36 (3): 539–558.
7.
BlomqvistPGreen-PedersenC (2004) Defeat at Home? Issue-Ownership and Social Democratic Support in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition39 (4): 587–613.
8.
BrasherH (2009) The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations. Party Politics15 (1): 69–92.
9.
BudgeI (1994) A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology, and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporally. British Journal of Political Science24 (4): 443–467.
10.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Party Competition. Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data. In: DaalderHMairP (eds) West European Party Systems: Continuity & Change. London: SAGE Publishing, pp. 267–305.
11.
BusemeyerMFranzmannSGarritzmannJ (2013) Who Owns Education? Cleavage Structures in the Partisan Competition over Educational Expansion. West European Politics36 (3): 521–546.
CarminesE (1991) The Logic of Party Alignments. Journal of Theoretical Politics3 (1): 65–80.
14.
ClarkeHSandersDStewartM. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DahlbergSMartinssonJ (2015) Changing Issue Ownership through Policy Communication. West European Politics38 (4): 817–838.
16.
DaltonRWattenbergM (2002) Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DamoreD (2004) The Dynamics of Issue Ownerships in Presidential Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly57: 391–397.
18.
DavidssonJMarxP (2013) Losing the Issue, Losing the Vote: Issue Competition and the Reform of Unemployment Insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies61 (3): 505–522.
19.
DolezalMEnsser-JedenastikLMullerW. (2013) How Parties Compete for Votes: A Test of Saliency Theory. European Journal of Political Research53 (1): 57–76.
20.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
21.
EganP (2013) Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GreenJHoboltS (2007) Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies27: 460–476.
23.
GreenJJenningsW (2012) Valence as Macro-Competence: An Analysis of Mood in Party Competence Evaluations in Great Britain. British Journal of Political Science42 (2): 311–343.
24.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The Growing Importance of Issues. Political Studies55 (4): 608–628.
25.
HibbsD (1977) Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review71 (4): 1467–1487.
26.
HolianD (2004) He’s Stealing My Issues! Clinton’s Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership. Political Behaviour26 (2): 95–124.
27.
KleinnijenhuisJWalterA (2014) News, Discussion, and Associative Issue Ownership: Instability at the Micro Level versus Stability at the Macro Level. The International Journal of Press/Politics19 (2): 226–245.
28.
KlingemannH-DHofferbertRBudgeI (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
LefevereJTreschAWalgraveS (2015) Introduction: Issue Ownership. West European Politics38 (4): 755–760.
30.
MeguidB (2008) Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review99 (3): 347–359.
PetrocikJ (1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science40 (3): 825–850.
33.
PopeJWoonJ (2009) Measuring Changes in American Party Reputations, 1939–2004. Political Research Quarterly62 (4): 653–661.
34.
RikerW (1996) The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
RobertsonD (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.
36.
SchattschneiderE (1960) The Semisovereign People. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
37.
SpoonJ-JHoboltSDe VriesC (2013) Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research53 (2): 363–380.
38.
StubagerRSlothuusR (2013) What Are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level. Political Behaviour35 (3): 567–588.
39.
TaggartP (1998) A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research33 (3): 363–388.
40.
TherriaultA (2015) Whose Issue Is It Anyway? A New Look at the Meaning and Measurement of Issue Ownership. British Journal of Political Science45 (4): 929–938.
41.
TreschALefevereJWalgraveS (2013) ‘Steal Me If You Can!’: The Impact of Campaign Messages on Associative Issue Ownership. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 30 January. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812472576.
42.
Van der BrugW (2004) Issue Ownership and Party Choice. Electoral Studies23: 209–233.
43.
Van KersbergenK (1995) Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.
44.
VolkensALehmannPMerzN. (2014) The Manifesto Data Collection: Manifesto Project. Berlin: WZB.
45.
WalgraveSLefevereJTreschA (2012) The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly76 (4): 771–782.
46.
WalgraveSTreschALefevereJ (2015) The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership. West European Politics38 (4): 778–796.
47.
WhiteleyPClarkeHSandersD. (2013) Affluence, Austerity and Electoral Change in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
WrightJ (2012) Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage. American Political Science Review106 (4): 685–702.
