An English Word Database of EMOtional TErms (EMOTE)

Abstract

Research in the socio-emotional domain may require words for experimental settings rated on emotionally and socially relevant word characteristics (e.g., valence and desirability). In addition, cognitively relevant word characteristics (e.g., imagery) are important for research in the interface of emotion and cognition (e.g., emotional memory). To provide researchers with a corresponding word pool, the database of English EMOtional TErms (EMOTE) provides subjective ratings for 1287 nouns and 985 adjectives. Nouns and adjectives were rated on valence, arousal, emotionality, concreteness, imagery, familiarity, and clarity of meaning. In addition, adjectives were rated on control, desirability, and likeableness. EMOTE norms provide an easily accessible word pool for research in the socio-emotional domain. To illustrate the usefulness of this database, norms were linked to memorability scores from a word recognition task for EMOTE nouns. The database as well as future directions are discussed.

Keywords

words norms valence arousal emotionality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

N. H.

(1968) Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 272–279.

Anderson

S. M.

Chen

(2002) The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review 109: 619–645. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.4.619.

Baldwin

M. W.

(1992) Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin 112: 461–484. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461.

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Finkenauer

Vohs

K. D.

(2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5: 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.

Bellezza

F. S.

Greenwald

A. G.

Banaji

M. R.

(1986) Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 18: 299–303.

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical Report C-1). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Brown

W. P.

Ure

D. M. J.

(1969) Five rated characteristics of 650 word association stimuli. British Journal of Psychology 60: 233–249. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01196.x.

Brysbaert

New

(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41: 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.

Christianson

S. -Ä.

(1992) Remembering emotional events. In: Christianson

S.-Ä.

(ed.) The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 308–340.

10.

Clark

J. M.

Paivio

(2004) Extensions of the Paivio, Yille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods 36: 371–383. doi:10.3758/BF03195584.

11.

Di Vesta, F. J., & Walls, R. T. (1970). Factor analysis of the semantic attributes of 487 words and some relationships to the conceptual behavior of fifth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 1–15.

12.

Garcia

Garas

Schweitzer

(2012) Positive words carry less information than negative words. The European Physical Journal Data Science 1: 3, doi:10.1140/epjds3.

13.

Gilet

A.-L.

Grühn

Studer

Labouvie-Vief

(2012) Valence, arousal, and imagery ratings for 835 French attributes by young, middle-aged, and older adults: The French emotional evaluation list (FEEL). European Review of Applied Psychology 62: 173–181. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2012.03.003.

14.

Gorman

A. M.

(1961) Recognition memory four nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61: 23–29. doi:10.1037/h0040561.

15.

Grühn

Scheibe

(2008) Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the international affective picture system (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age? Behavior Research Methods 40: 512–521. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.2.512.

16.

Grühn

Sharifian

(2016) Lists of emotional stimuli. In: Meiselman

(ed.) Emotion measurement, Duxford, England: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 145–164.

17.

Grühn

Smith

(2008) Characteristics for 200 words rated by young and older adults: Age-dependent evaluations of German adjectives (AGE). Behavior Research Methods 40: 1088–1097. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.4.1088.

18.

Grühn

Smith

Baltes

P. B.

(2005) No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: Evidence from a heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words. Psychology and Aging 20: 579–588. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.579.

19.

Higgins

E. T.

Rholes

W. S.

Jones

C. R.

(1977) Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 141–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3.

20.

Kausler

D. H.

(1994) Learning and memory in normal aging, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

21.

Keil

Freund

(2009) Changes in the sensitivity to appetitive and aversive arousal across adulthood. Psychology and Aging 24: 668–680. doi:10.1037/a0016969.

22.

Kloumann

I. M.

Danforth

C. M.

Harris

K. D.

Bliss

C. A.

Dodds

P. S.

(2012) Positivity of the English language. PLoS One 7: e29484, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029484.

23.

Kučera

Francis

W. N.

(1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

24.

Ortony

Clore

G. L.

Foss

M. A.

(1987) The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science 11: 341–364. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1103_4.

25.

Paivio

Yuille

J. C.

Madigan

S. A.

(1968) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76(1, PT. 2): 1–25. doi:10.1037/h0025327.

26.

Reisberg

Hertel

(2004) Memory & emotion, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

27.

Ribeiro

R. L.

Pompéia

Bueno

O. F. A.

(2005) Comparison of Brazilian and American norms for the international affective picture system (IAPS). Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 27: 208–215.

28.

Rozin

Royzman

E. B.

(2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5: 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2.

29.

Rubin

D. C.

Friendly

(1986) Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition 14: 79–94.

30.

Schulman

A. I.

(1967) Word length and rarity in recognition memory. Psychonomic Science 9: 211–212.

31.

Strauss

G. P.

Allen

D. N.

(2008) Emotional intensity and categorization ratings for emotional and nonemotional words. Cognition & Emotion 22: 114–133. doi:10.1080/02699930701319154.

32.

Warriner

A. B.

Kuperman

Brysbaert

(2013) Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 45: 1191–1207.

33.

Wentura

Rothermund

Bak

(2000) Automatic vigilance: The attention-grapping power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 78: 1024–1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024.

34.

Whissell

(2009) Using the revised dictionary of affect in language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychological Reports 105: 509–521. doi:10.2466/PR0.105.2.509-521.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.43 MB