Abstract
This article attempts to construct a history of the first half-century of the field of rehabilitation counseling by identifying the seminal books that initiated or documented significant developments in the field. Those books fall into three categories: (a) books on theories and principles of human behavior, vocations, and counseling that underlie rehabilitation counseling practice (9 books); (b) books on disability (9 books); and (c) books on rehabilitation (37 books). By arraying books in each subcategory in chronological order, one can trace the evolution of the field. Unmet and future needs of the literature are suggested.
Keywords
As a science-based discipline, rehabilitation counseling does not take kindly to inexplicable events, but one happened to me. About 20 years ago, I received an unsolicited package in the mail, containing a faded green paper-covered booklet with three words printed on the cover: Rehabilitation Counselor Preparation. Tucked inside the cover was the bottom half of a standard government-issue transmission slip on which was written, “This is a classic. Guard it. It originally belonged to Corbett Reedy—who served as a Region III Commissioner long ago.” In the FROM box, it was signed “D. Columbus.” Although I knew Dorothy Columbus was on the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) staff, I had never met her and do not recall having heard from her before or since this instance. As the TO box was missing from the transmission slip, I wondered if this package was really meant for me and what I was supposed to do with it, beside “Guard it.” Finally, I think that I may have figured out the task that she was implicitly setting for me. That task is to be found in the title of the booklet she sent me, to chronicle the books that most cogently shaped the field of rehabilitation counseling over the field’s first half century, that is, its formative years. As this year marks my 55th year as a rehabilitation counselor educator, starting in 1966 at Illinois Institute of Technology and ending up, currently, at University of Massachusetts Boston, I set that number for the books I would include. Probably this list says more about me than about the field, but having been set this task, I am obliged to see it through as best I can.
Like Venus in Greco-Roman mythology, rehabilitation counseling emerged at birth (in the 1954 Vocational Rehabilitation Act Amendments) as a fully formed adult. Both these creation stories include prenatal influences and eventful postnatal histories. For rehab, those formative influences and subsequent history can be largely traced through the seminal books that initiated or documented significant developments in the field. A prototype for these books (and the first concerned with rehab counselor preparation) was Corbett Reedy’s copy of Hall and Warren (1956). A limitation of this approach is that it omits authors of equally seminal journal articles or book chapters who did not produce any qualifying books (e.g., Harlan Hahn). Nevertheless, it offers a perspective, albeit a subjective one, that seemed worth trying.
In assembling this list, I was guided by several ground rules. First, with one amazingly prophetic exception (Davis, 1943), all books on disability and rehabilitation had to be published between 1953 and 2006, that is, from the start of the legislative process that produced Public Law 565 (the 1954 Vocational Rehabilitation Act Amendments, in which the term rehabilitation counselor was legislatively formalized), until 15 years ago, to permit time for historic perspective before assessing more recent books’ impact. Second, no individual could be listed as author or editor more than twice. The list consists of three broad categories: (a) underlying theories and principles of human behavior, vocations, and counseling; (b) disability; and (c) rehabilitation. Books in each subcategory are listed in chronological order, to reflect the evolution of the field. Finally, if a book on disability or rehabilitation had multiple editions, the first and last one before the 2006 cutoff date were cited. For underlying theory books, only the first edition in English is cited. The underlying theory category intentionally omits the traditional “Greats” of behavioral science (e.g., Freud, Bandura, Frank Parsons) and limits itself to those who directly addressed issues of disability or rehabilitation and whose ideas shaped the developing field. My editorial comments on particular books are added parenthetically.
Books on Underlying Theories and Principles (n = 9)
Human Behavior
Adler (1927), for the concepts of organ inferiority and compensatory striving
Lewin (1936), for the concept B = f (P × E) (and for training pioneering scholars in disability and rehabilitation, such as Beatrice Wright and Tamara Dembo, who was a faculty mentor in my VA traineeship)
Maslow (1962), for hierarchy of needs
Vocations
Super (1957), for the first career development book to include a chapter on the impact of disabilities
Lofquist and Dawis (1969), for the theory of work adjustment (TWA), based in rehab
Neff (1985), for broad coverage of rehab implications of work
Counseling
Rogers (1942), for client-focused counseling relationship
Frankl (1959), for coping with catastrophic life events
Conyne and Cook (2004), for applying Lewin’s (1936) principle of B = f (P × E)
Books on Disability (n = 9)
Defining and Describing Disability
Barker et al. (1953), Garrett (1953); B. A. Wright (1960/1983); Murphy (1987); and Jaeger and Bowman (2005)
Principles of Disabilities
Goffman (1963), for stigma; Wolfensberger (1972), for normalization; Shapiro (1993) and Charlton (2000), for empowerment and advocacy
Books on Rehabilitation (n = 37)
Books of General Public Interest
Davis (1943) (amazingly prophetic of the field that would emerge and so included despite its date); Allan (1958) (outstanding popular introduction to the scope of rehabilitation); Krusen (1964); Greenberg (1965) (the only work of fiction about rehabilitation counseling); Jaques (1970) (who introduced me and many others to the field and mentored me through my early years); and Hammell (2006) (raises the right questions for a mid-century retrospective)
General Books for Professionals
McGowan and Porter (1967) (the original “go-to book” for defining the field); Patterson (1969); Rusalem and Malikin (1976); G. N. Wright (1980) (great codifier of the state of the field at a quarter century and a generous mentor to me even though I had not been his student); and Rubin and Roessler (1987/2001)
Books on Rehab of Specific Populations
Greenblatt and Simon (1959) and Anthony (1978) on mental illness; Garrett and Levine (1973) on physical disability; Wehman and Moon (1988) on developmental disability; and McMahon and Shaw (1991) on brain injury
Books on Special Aspects of the Field
Hall and Warren (1956) the first book on rehabilitation counselor preparation; Jacobs et al. (1961) on counseling in rehab; Sussman (1965) and Safilios-Rothschild (1970) on sociology of rehab; Felton (1966) on medical information; Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (1987) on professional ethics; and Bellini and Rumrill (1999) on rehab research
Books on Vocational Aspects of Rehab
Lofquist (1957) on vocational counseling; Azrin and Besalel (1980) on job clubs; Bolton (1982) on vocational adjustment; Power (1984/2006) on vocational assessment; Witt (1992) on job hunting; and Szymanski and Parker (1996/2003) on career development and job placement
Books on Rehabilitation Policy
Conley (1959); Bowe (1980); Scotch (1984); Stone (1984); and O’Brien (2001)
Books on History of Rehabilitation
Obermann (1965); Viscardi (1967); and Walker (1985) (biography of Mary E. Switzer, the most important person in the history of rehabilitation counseling)
These 55 books appeared fairly evenly throughout the first half century of the field’s existence. Dividing the period into 5-year intervals, three intervals (1958–1962, 1963–1967, and 1983–1987) produced more than average (seven or eight books each; not surprising for 1958–1967, given the initial void that needed filling); two intervals produced less than average (1973–1977 and 1993–1997, two books each); and all other intervals produced between three and five books each. The modal number across all intervals was 5.
Conclusion
As rehabilitation counseling moves into its second half century, it is important to look both back and ahead. The 1954 Amendments created a sudden demand for professional rehabilitation counselors before adequate training materials or programs existed. Office of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR, now RSA) came forward to address these specialized needs, with publications such as Garrett (1953), McGowan and Porter (1967), and Felton’s (1966) manual of medical information for rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation counselor education programs (RCEPs) expanded exponentially. For example, in my doctoral program in counseling psychology, I never heard the term rehabilitation counselor mentioned, yet out of my late 1950s to early 1960s cohort of five students, three became directors of RCEPs within a few years of receiving their degrees. Before long, textbook publishers discovered the market and new books began to proliferate.
Looking to the future, many of the new books of the recent past have been updated editions of widely used textbooks. While this has been a safe bet for authors and publishers, it fails to address emerging populations and environmental contexts (Lewin’s P and E) facing the field. For example, the needs of aging workers and of COVID-19 long-haulers have not received attention. Likewise, environmental developments such as telecommuting and retraining of displaced workers with disabilities in a time of artificial intelligence (AI) require study. The task that Dorothy Columbus set does not end with this article.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Elaine Davey, MS, CRC, and James Soldner, PhD, CRC, for reviewing the list of books and suggesting items I had overlooked.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
