This study provides the first detailed account of perceptual dialectology within California (as well as one of the first accounts of perceptual dialectology within any single state). Quantitative analysis of a map-labeling task carried out in Southern California reveals that California's most salient linguistic boundary is between the northern and southern regions of the state. Whereas studies of the perceptual dialectology of the United States as a whole have focused almost exclusively on regional dialect differences, respondents associated particular regions of California less with distinctive dialects than with differences in language (English versus Spanish), slang use, and social groups. The diverse sociolinguistic situation of California is reflected in the emphasis both on highly salient social groups thought to be stereotypical of California by residents and nonresidents alike (e.g., surfers) and on groups that, though prominent in the cultural landscape of the state, remain largely unrecognized by outsiders (e.g., hicks).
Anderson, Benedict.1983. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.
2.
Barker, Valerie, and Howard Giles.2002. Who Supports the English-Only Movement? Evidence for Misconceptions about Latino Group Vitality. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development23 (5): 353-70.
3.
———. 2004. English-Only Policies: Perceived Support and Social Limitation . Language and Communication24 (1): 77-95.
4.
Benson, Erica J.2003. Folk Linguistic Perceptions and the Mapping of Dialect Boundaries. American Speech78 (3): 307-30.
5.
Blyth, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang.1990. I'm Like, “Say What?!” A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative. American Speech65 (3): 215-27.
6.
Bucholtz, Mary.2004. The Appropriation of African American Vernacular English as European American Youth Slang. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , October.
7.
———. 2006. Word Up: Social Meanings of Slang in California Youth Culture. In A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings, edited by Jane Goodman and Leila Monaghan, 243-67. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
8.
Bucholtz, Mary, Nancy Bermudez, Lisa Edwards, Victor Fung, and Rosalva Vargas.2008. The Normative North and the Stigmatized South: Ideology and Methodology in the Perceptual Dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics36 (1).
9.
Carver, Craig M.1987. American Regional Dialects: A Word Geography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Cran, William, director.1986. An English-Speaking World. In The Story of English, program 1. VHS. Los Angeles: Criterion/Home Vision.
11.
———, director. 2005. Do You Speak American? DVD. New York: PBS.
12.
Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer.2000. The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes toward Focuser like and Quotative like. Journal of Sociolinguistics4 (1): 60-80.
13.
Ferrara, Kathleen, and Barbara Bell.1995. Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of be + like. American Speech70 (3): 265-90.
14.
Fought, Carmen.2002. California Students' Perceptions of, You Know, Regions and Dialects? In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2, edited by Daniel Long and Dennis R. Preston, 117-36. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
15.
Gal, Susan, and Judith T. Irvine .1995. The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference. Social Research62: 967-1001.
16.
Geyer, Grant.2001. “The” Freeway in Southern California. American Speech76 (2): 221-24.
Giles, Howard, and Peter F. Powesland .1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation . London: Academic Press.
19.
Hartley, Laura C.2005. The Consequences of Conflicting Stereotypes: Bostonian Perceptions of U.S. Dialects. American Speech80 (4): 388-405.
20.
Hinton, Leanne, Birch Moonwomon, Sue Bremner, Herb Luthin, Mary Van Clay, Jean Lerner, and Hazel Corcoran.1987. It's Not Just the Valley Girls: A Study of California English. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, edited by Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 117-28. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
21.
Irvine, Judith T.2001. “Style” as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, edited by Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford, 21-43. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal.2000. Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, edited by Paul V. Kroskrity, 35-84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
23.
Johnstone, Barbara.2004. Place, Globalization, and Linguistic Variation. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, edited by Carmen Fought, 65-83. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Kiesling, Scott F.2004. Dude. American Speech79 (3): 281-305.
25.
Lance, Donald M.1999. Regional Variation in Subjective Dialect Divisions in the United States. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 1, edited by Dennis R. Preston, 283-314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
Long, Daniel, and Dennis R. Preston, eds. 2002. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
27.
MacKaye, Susannah D. A.1990. California Proposition 63: Language Attitudes Reflected in the Public Debate. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science508:135-46.
28.
Orellana, Marjorie Faulstich, Lucila Ek, and Arcelia Hernandez .1999. Bilingual Education in an Immigrant Community: Proposition 227 in California. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism2 (2): 114-30.
29.
Preston, Dennis R.1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht : Foris.
30.
———. 1993. Folk dialectology. In American Dialect Research, edited by Dennis R.Preston, 333-77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
31.
———, ed. 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32.
Rickford, John R.1999. The Ebonics Controversy in My Backyard: A Sociolinguist's Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics3 (2): 267-75.
33.
Rickford, John R., and Russell J. Rickford .2000. Spoken Soul: The Story of Black English. New York: Wiley.
34.
Ronkin, Maggie, and Helen E. Karn.1999. Mock Ebonics: Linguistic Racism in Parodies of Ebonics on the Internet. Journal of Sociolinguistics3 (3): 360-80.
35.
Tamasi, Susan.2003. Cognitive Patterns of Linguistic Perceptions. Ph.D. diss ., University of Georgia.
36.
Underhill, Robert.1988. Like is, Like, Focus. American Speech63 (3): 234-46.
