As part of a larger perceptual dialectology study of linguistic diversity within California, this article focuses on a survey of Californians regarding the evaluation of language use within the state. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of two open-ended survey questions regarding where Californians “speak the best” and “speak the worst” reveals that Southern California is stigmatized by a majority of respondents as having the worst speech within the state and Northern California is valorized as having the best speech, due to the perceived differential access of speakers to educational opportunities. A small but socially significant “political correctness effect” also emerges, whereby some respondents indicate reluctance to evaluate others' linguistic varieties. The findings demonstrate both the need for greater attentiveness to ideological issues in research design and the importance of combining different theoretical and methodological traditions in the study of language ideologies and attitudes.
Blommaert, Jan, ed. 1999. Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
Bonfiglio, ThomasPaul. 2002. Race and the Rise of Standard American. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
3.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, and Tyrone A. Forman .2000. “I Am Not a Racist but…”: Mapping White College Students' Racial Ideology in the USA. Discourse and Society11:50—85.
4.
Bucholtz, Mary.2001. The Whiteness of Nerds: Superstandard English and Racial Markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11(1): 84—100.
5.
Bucholtz, Mary, Nancy Bermudez, Lisa Edwards, Victor Fung, and Rosalva Vargas.2007. Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The Perceptual Dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics35(4): 325—352.
Collins, James.1998. Our Ideologies and Theirs. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, edited by Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard , and Paul V. Kroskrity, 256—270. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Evans, Betsy.2005. “The Grand Daddy of English”: US, UK, New Zealand and Australian Students' Attitudes toward Varieties of English. In Linguistic Purism in the Germanic Languages, edited by Nils Langer and Winifred V. Davies, 239—251. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
9.
Fillmore, Lily Wong.2004. Language in Education. In Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Edward Finegan and John R. Rickford, 339—360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Fisher, Robert J.1993. Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Research20:303—315.
11.
Fought, Carmen.2002. California Students' Perceptions of, You Know, Regions and Dialects? In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, edited by Daniel Long and Dennis R. Preston, 117—136. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
12.
Fridland, Valerie, and Kathryn Bartlett.2006. Correctness, Pleasantness, and Degree of Difference Ratings across Regions. American Speech81(4): 358—386.
13.
Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland, and Angie Williams.2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
14.
Garrett, Peter, Angie Williams, and Betsy Evans.2005. Attitudinal Data from New Zealand, Australia, the USA and UK about Each Other's Englishes: Recent Changes or Consequences of Methodologies?Multilingua24:211—235.
15.
Geyer, Grant.2001. “The” Freeway in Southern California. American Speech76(2): 221—224.
16.
Hartley, Laura C.1999. A View from the West: Perceptions of U.S. Dialects by Oregon Residents. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1, edited by Dennis R. Preston, 315—332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17.
Hartley, Laura C., and Dennis R. Preston .1999. The Names of U.S. English: Valley Girl, Cowboy, Yankee, Normal, Nasal and Ignorant. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Tony Bex and Richard J. Watts, 207—238. London: Routledge.
18.
Hill, Jane H.1993. Hasta la Vista, Baby: Anglo Spanish in the American Southwest . Critique of Anthropology13(2): 145—176.
19.
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke.2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland , and Dariusz Galasinski, eds. 2004. Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21.
Jones, Katharine W.2001. Accent on Privilege: English Identities and Anglophilia in the U.S. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
22.
Kroskrity, Paul V., ed. 2000. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
23.
Labov, William.1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
Lance, Donald M.1999. Regional Variation in Subjective Dialect Divisions in the United States. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1, edited by Dennis R. Preston, 283—314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25.
Lippi-Green, Rosina.1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.
26.
Milroy, Lesley.2000. Britain and the United States: Two Nations Divided by the Same Language (and Different Language Ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology10(1): 56—89.
27.
Niedzielski, Nancy, and Dennis R. Preston .1999. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28.
Pomerantz, Anita.1984. Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57—101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Preston, Dennis R.1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht : Foris.
30.
———. 1993. Folk Dialectology. In American Dialect Research, edited by Dennis R.Preston, 333—377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31.
———. 1996. Where the Worst English Is Spoken. In Focus on the U.S.A., edited by Edgar W. Schneider , 183—194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32.
———. 1997. The South: The Touchstone. In Language Variety in the South Revisited, edited by CynthiaBernstein, Thomas Nunnally, and Robin Sabino, 311—351. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
33.
———. 1999. A Language Attitude Approach to the Perception of Regional Variety. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1, edited by Dennis R. Preston , 359—373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
Rapley, Mark, and Charles Antaki.1996. A Conversation Analysis of the “Acquiescence” of People with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology6(3): 207—227.
35.
Rickford, John R. (1999). The Ebonics Controversy in My Backyard: A Sociolinguist's Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics3(2): 267—275.
36.
Ronkin, Maggie, and Helen E. Karn .1999. Mock Ebonics: Linguistic Racism in Parodies of Ebonics on the Internet. Journal of Sociolinguistics3(3): 360—380.
37.
Shenk, Petra Scott (2007). “I'm Mexican, Remember?”: Constructing Ethnic Identities via Authenticating Discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(2): 194—220.
38.
Silverstein, Michael.1996. Monoglot “Standard” in America: Standardization and Metaphors of Linguistic Hegemony. In The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Don Brenneis and Ronald K. S. Macaulay, 284—306. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39.
Suhr, Stephanie, and Sally Johnson, eds. 2003. Discourse and Society14 (1). Special issue: Political Correctness.
40.
Tamasi, Susan.2003. Cognitive Patterns of Linguistic Perceptions. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Georgia.
41.
Trudgill, Peter.1972. Sex, Covert Prestige, and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society1:179—195.
42.
van den Berg, Harry, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra , eds. 2004. Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Woolard, Kathryn A., and Bambi B. Schieffelin .1994. Language Ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology23:55—82.
44.
Woolard, Kathryn A., Bambi Schieffelin, and Paul V. Kroskrity, eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
