An Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision in Ricci v. DeStefano

Abstract

Almost 6 months after winning their U.S. Supreme Court case, a group of New Haven, Connecticut, firefighters celebrated their victory in grand style. The decision in Ricci v. DeStefano proved that the City of New Haven erred when it denied promotions to White firefighters who fared better on promotional examinations than did minority applicants. This article (a) examines the thrust of the Ricci decision, which involved two competing facets of the same equal employment opportunity (EEO) statute; (b) discusses the mistakes inherent in the testing procedures of the City of New Haven, Connecticut; (c) addresses the involvement of Justice Sonya Sotomayor in the decision; and (d) examines the implication of the decision for public-sector employers using testing procedures of the nature found in Ricci v. DeStefano. The author concludes that the decision underscores the need for use of alternative testing procedures and suggests that Ricci v. DeStefano is but a precursor to further litigation designed to render use of disparate-impact analysis unconstitutional.

Keywords

Title VII employment testing adverse impact disparate treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975).

Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, 485, U.S. 265 (1978).

Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Vacatur and Remand of Ricci v. DeStefano. (2009, February). Retrieved from http://www.supremecourtpreview.org

Cameron

D. R.

(2009, July 5). An indictment of New Haven. Boston Globe, p. K9.

Christoffersen

(2009, December 11). Promotion day for firefighters. The Atlanta Journal/Constitution, p. A13.

The Civil Rights Act of 1991–P.L. 102-166.

Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 400,446 (1982).

Davis

L. J.

(2009, June 15). Sotomayor and the New Haven firefighter’s case: More myths than facts. The Washington Times, p. A04.

Dorf

M. C.

(2009, July 1). The Supreme Court decides the New Haven firefighter case. Find Law/Legal Commentary. Retrieved from http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20090701.html

10.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1997, April). Employer EEO responsibilities: Preventing discrimination in the workplace. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

11.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Guidelines at 29 CFR §1688.1 (a) 2008.

12.

Greenhouse

(2009, June 30). For employers, ruling offers little guidance on how to make their hiring fair. New York Times, p. A13.

13.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).

14.

Lafferty

(2009, May 28). Judge Sonia Sotomayor has history of flawed legal thinking. Available from www.traditionalvalues.org

15.

Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, 421 F. 3d 1169 (2007).

16.

Peffer

S. L.

(2009). Title VII and disparate-treatment discrimination versus disparate-impact discrimination: The Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 407-408.

17.

Ricci v DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557(2009), 129 S. Ct. 2658 (2009).

18.

Uniform Guidelines on Employment Selection Procedures. 43 Fed. Reg. 38,290 (1978); 28 C.F.R. 50.14 (Department of Justice); 29 C.F.R. Pt. 1607 (EEOC 41 C.F.R. Pt. 60-3 (Department of Labor); 5 C.F.R. 300.103(c) (Office of Personnel Management).