Drug Courts and the Facilitation of Turning Points

Abstract

Life course theory has been used to explain why people stop committing crime and/or deviant behavior. Life course theory scholars have demonstrated important life events, such as marriage, gaining employment, or joining the military, have led to reduced recidivism; however, drug courts might also legitimately be considered a turning point for an offender. This study utilized semi-structured interviews with former drug court participants (n = 29) in an attempt to expand life course theory and demonstrate how drug courts should be considered a facilitator of “turning points” for previous criminal offenders. During the interviews, participants discussed how drug court helped them attain many important skills/ideas: self-esteem, improved relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment. A gendered analysis demonstrates women found drug court to be more useful at facilitating turning points than their male peers. Additionally, recidivism rates for the participants were lower than similarly situated offenders at the state level. While further research is needed, this study begins to advance the expansion of life course theory.

Keywords

drug court life course theory gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

(1997). On the concept of turning point. Comparative Social Research, 16, 85–105.

Andersen

(2015). Stories of change in drug treatment: A narrative analysis of “whats” and “hows” in institutional storytelling. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37, 668–682.

Belenko

(1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1, 1–27.

Belenko

(2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review: 2001 update. New York, NY: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

Benda

B. B.

(2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 325–342.

Berg

B. L.

(2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Best

D. W.

Ghufran

Day

Ray

Loaring

(2008). Breaking the habit: A retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 619–624.

Blomqvist

(2002). Recovery with and without treatment: A comparison of resolutions of alcohol and drug problems. Addiction Research & Theory, 10, 119–158.

Burns

S. L.

Peyrot

(2003). Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems, 50, 416–438.

10.

Burnstein

Stanger

Dumenci

(2012). Relations between parent psychopathology, family functioning, and adolescent problems in substance-abusing families: Disaggregating the effects of parent gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 43, 631–647.

11.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2011). 2011 adult institutions outcome evaluation report. Sacramento, CA: Author.

12.

California Department of Motor Vehicles. (2013). Annual report of the California DUI management information system. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

13.

Carey

S. M.

Mackin

J. R.

Finnigan

M. W.

(2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8, 6–42.

14.

Craig

J. M.

Diamond

Piquero

A. R.

(2014). Marriage as an intervention in the lives of criminal offenders. In Humphrey

J. A.

Cordella

(Eds.), Effective interventions in the lives of criminal offenders (chapter 2) (pp. 81–98). New York, NY: Springer.

15.

Cullen

F. T.

Wright

J. P.

Blevins

K. R.

(2006). Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

16.

Curran

P. J.

Muthen

B. O.

Harford

T. C.

(1998). The influence of changes in marital status on developmental trajectories of alcohol use in young adults. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 647–658.

17.

Dawson

D. A.

Goldstein

R. B.

Ruan

W. J.

Grant

B. F.

(2012). Correlates of recovery from alcohol dependence: A prospective study over a 3-year follow-up interval. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 1268–1277.

18.

Dawson

D. A.

Grant

B. F.

Stinson

F. S.

Chou

P. S.

(2006). Maturing out of alcohol dependence: The impact of transitional life events. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 195–203.

19.

Denzin

N. K.

(1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

20.

Deschenes

E. P.

Turner

Greenwood

P. W.

(1995). Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County’s Drug Court. Justice System Journal, 18, 55–73.

21.

Doherty

E. E.

Ensminger

M. E.

(2013). Marriage and offending among a cohort of disadvantaged African Americans. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 104–131.

22.

Doukas

(2011). Perceived barriers to identity transformation for people who are prescribed methadone. Addiction Research and Theory, 19, 408–415.

23.

Elder

G. H.

(1986). Military times and turning points in men’s lives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 233–245.

24.

Emerson

R. M.

(1983). Holistic effects in social control decision-making. Law & Society Review, 17, 425–455.

25.

Farole

D. J.

Cissner

A. B.

(2005). Seeing eye to eye? Participant and staff perspectives on drug court. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.

26.

Fischer

Geiger

Hughes

M. E.

(2007). Female recidivists speak about their experience in drug court while engaging in appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 703–722.

27.

Francis

T. R.

Abel

E. M.

(2014). Redefining success: A qualitative investigation of therapeutic outcomes for noncompleting drug court clients. Journal of Social Science Research, 40, 325–338.

28.

Fulkerson

(2009). The drug treatment court as a form of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 12, 253–267.

29.

Fulkerson

Keena

L. D.

O’Brien

(2012). Understanding success and nonsuccess in the drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 20, 1–20.

30.

Garland

(1990). Punishment and modern society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Goldkamp

J. S.

White

M. D.

Robinson

J. B.

(2002). An honest chance: Perspectives on drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 6, 369–372.

32.

Gottfredson

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

33.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Kearley

Najaka

S. S.

Rocha

C. M.

(2005). The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: 3-year outcome study. Evaluation Review, 29, 42–64.

34.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Najaka

S. S.

Kearley

(2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171–196.

35.

Graham

Bowling

(1995). Young people and crime. Research study 145. London, England: Home Office.

36.

Greenfield

S. F.

Brooks

A. J.

Gordon

S. M.

Green

C. A.

Gropp

McHugh

R. K.

… Miele

G. M.

(2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Dependency, 86, 1–21.

37.

Harmer

A. L.

Sanderson

Mertin

(1999). Influence of negative childhood experiences on psychological functioning, social support, and parenting for mothers recovering from addiction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 421–433.

38.

Henwood

B. F.

Padgett

D. K.

Smith

B. T.

Tiderington

(2012). Substance abuse recovery after experiencing homelessness and mental illness: Case studies of change over time. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 8, 238–246.

39.

Herbeck

D. M.

Brecht

M. L.

Christou

Lovinger

(2014). A qualitative study of methamphetamine users’ perspectives on barriers and facilitators of drug abstinence. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 46, 215–225.

40.

Hibell

Andersson

Ahlstrom

Balakivera

Bjarnason

Kokkevi

Morgan

(2000). Alcohol and other drug use among students in 30 European countries. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health.

41.

Hickert

A. O.

Boyle

S. W.

Tollefson

D. R.

(2009). Factors that predict drug court completion and dropout: Findings from an evaluation of Salt Lake County’s adult felony drug court. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 149–162.

42.

Hora

P. F.

Schma

W. G.

Rosenthal

J. T. A.

(1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. University of Notre Dame, 74, 439.

43.

Huddleston

(2005). Drug courts: An effective strategy for communities facing methamphetamine. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.

44.

Huddleston

Marlowe

D. B.

(2011). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.

45.

Huddleston

Marlowe

D. B.

Casebolt

(2008). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, National Drug Court Institute.

46.

Jessup

M. A.

Ross

T. B.

Jones

A. L.

Satre

D. D.

Weisner

C. M.

Chi

F. W.

Mertens

J. R.

(2014). Significant life events and their impact on alcohol and drug use: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 46, 450–459.

47.

Judge

(1997). Critical issues for defenders in the design and operation of a drug court. Indigent Defense, November/December, 1–8.

48.

Karlamangla

Zhou

Reuben

Greendale

Moore

(2006). Longitudinal trajectories of heavy drinking in adults in the United States of America. Addiction, 101, 91–99.

49.

Kaskutas

L. A.

(1996). Pathways to self-help among women for sobriety. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22, 259–280.

50.

Kaye

(2013). Rehabilitating ‘the drugs’ lifestyle: Criminal justice, social control, and the cultivation of agency. Ethnography, 14, 207–232.

51.

Kearney

M. H.

O’Sullivan

(2003). Identity shifts as turning points in health behavior change. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 134–152.

52.

Keller

P. S.

Cummings

E. M.

Davies

P. T.

Mitchell

P. M.

(2008). Longitudinal relations between parental drinking problems, family functioning, and child adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 195–212.

53.

Keena

L. D.

Fulkerson

Griep

(2007). Volunteers in a drug treatment court restorative justice program. International Journal of Restorative Justice, 3, 21–39.

54.

King

R. D.

Massoglia

MacMillan

(2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45, 33–65.

55.

Kirk

D. S.

(2012). Residential change as a turning point in the life course of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation? Criminology, 50, 329–357.

56.

Laub

J. H.

Nagin

D. S.

Sampson

R. J.

(1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225–238.

57.

Lindquist

C. H.

Krebs

C. P.

Warner

T. D.

Lattimore

P. K.

(2009). An exploration of treatment and supervision intensity among drug court and non-drug court participants. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 167–193.

58.

Listwan

S. J.

Sundt

J. L.

Holsinger

A. M.

Latessa

E. J.

(2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389–411.

59.

McIntosh

McKeganey

(2000). Addicts’ narratives of recovery from drug use: Constructing a non-addict identity. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1501–1510.

60.

Mitchell

Wilson

D. B.

Eggers

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.

61.

Moffitt

(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review 100, 674–701.

62.

Nagin

D. S.

Paternoster

(1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implications of a theory of individual differences in criminal offending. Criminology, 32, 581–606.

63.

National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2010). Behind bars II: Substance abuse and America’s prison population. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

64.

National Women’s Law Center. (2007). When girls don’t graduate we all fail: A call to improve high school graduation rates for girls. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.

65.

Neuman

W. L.

(2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

66.

Nolan

J. L.

(2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

67.

Osgood

D. W.

Lee

(1993). Leisure activities, age, and adult roles across the lifespan. Society and Leisure, 16, 181–208.

68.

Patten

Messer

Candela

(2014). “I don’t see myself as prison material”: Motivations for entering a rural drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 1188–1202.

69.

Patterson

G. R.

(1993). Orderly change in a stable world: The antisocial trait as a Chimera. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 911–919.

70.

Patton

M. Q.

(2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

71.

Piquero

A. R.

(2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In Liberman

(Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (chapter 3) (pp. 23–78). New York, NY: Springer.

72.

Rehm

Ashley

M. J.

Room

Single

Bondy

Ferrence

Giesbrecht

(1996). On the emerging paradigm of drinking patterns and their social and health consequences. Addiction, 91, 1615–1621.

73.

Rempel

Fox-Kralstein

Cissner

Cohen

Labriola

Farole

… Magnani

(2003). The New York State adult drug court evaluation: Policies, participants, and impacts. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation.

74.

Roberts

J. C.

Wolfer

(2011). Female drug offenders reflect on their experiences with a county drug court program. Qualitative Report, 16, 84–102.

75.

Roman

Townsend

Bhati

A. S.

(2003). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates. Washington, DC: Caliber Associates, The Urban Institute.

76.

Rutter

M. D.

Quinton

Hill

(1990). Adult outcomes and institution-reared children: Males and females compared. In Robins

L. N.

Rutter

(Eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 135–137). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

77.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.

78.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

79.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In Thornberry

Terence P.

(Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 131–161). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

80.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

81.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(2005). A life-course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45.

82.

Satre

D. D.

Chi

F. W.

Mertens

J. R.

Weisner

C. M.

(2012). Effects of age and life transitions on alcohol and drug treatment outcome over nine years. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 459–468.

83.

Shaffer

D. K.

(2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521.

84.

Shaffer

D. K.

Hartman

J. L.

Listwan

S. J.

(2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 803–828.

85.

Shannon

L. M.

Jackson

Perkins

Neal

(2014). Examining gender differences in substance use, participant characteristics, and treatment outcomes among individuals in drug court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(6), 455–477.

86.

Shover

(1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

87.

Somers

J. M.

Moniruzzaman

Rezansoff

S. N.

Patterson

(2014). Examining the impact of case management in Vancouver’s downtown community court: A quasi-experimental design. PLOS ONE, 9, 1–8.

88.

Theobald

Farrington

D. P.

(2009). Effects of getting married on offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of males: European Journal of Criminology, 6, 496–516.

89.

Tiger

(2011). Drug courts and the logic of coerced treatment. Sociological Forum, 26, 169–182.

90.

Turner

Longshore

Wenzel

Deschenes

Greenwood

Fain

… McBride

(2002). A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1489–1527.

91.

Uggen

(2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65, 529–546.

92.

Uggen

Staff

(2001). Work as a turning point for criminal offenders. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 1–16.

93.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Washington, DC: Author.

94.

Vaillant

G. E.

Vaillant

C. O.

(1981). Natural history of male psychological health: Work as a predictor of positive mental health. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 1433–1440.

95.

Vandermause

Severtsen

Roll

(2013). Re-creating a vision of motherhood: Therapeutic drug court and the narrative. Qualitative Social Work, 12, 620–636.

96.

Waite

L. J.

Gallagher

(2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York, NY: Doubleday.

97.

Warr

(1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.

98.

Wilson

D. B.

Mitchell

Mackenzie

D. L.

(2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.

99.

Wolfer

(2006). Graduates speak: A qualitative exploration of drug court graduates’ views of the strengths and weaknesses of the program. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33, 303–320.