Political Identities,Religious Identity,and the Pattern of Moral Foundations among Conservative Christians

Abstract

Consistent with social identity theory, political identity was strongly linked to conservative Christians’ morality represented by the Moral Foundation Theory model. Participants identifying as Democrats scored significantly higher than did those identifying as Republicans on the individualizing foundations of care and fairness but significantly lower than Republicans on the binding foundations of authority, loyalty, and purity. In addition, political identity differentially related to the two liberty subfoundations consistent with salient political party themes. Hierarchical regression analyses identified political identity as a consistent predictor of all moral foundations beyond the variance accounted for by unique contributions of gender and education. RS factors, primarily fundamentalism, contributed additional incremental value to predicting the three binding but not the individualizing foundations, which suggests a congruent dual identity (political, religious) for Republicans that does not hold for Democrats.

Keywords

fundamentalism psychology of religion gender issues moral development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baez

Flichtentrei

Prats

Mastandueno

García

A. M.

Cetkovich

Ibáñez

(2017). Men, women . . . Who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. Plos ONE, 12(6), 1–21.

Bassett

R. L.

Breault

Buettner

Vitale

Hochheimer

Moore

(2014). Moral foundations theory and the inclination to forgive and seek forgiveness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Christian Association for Psychological Studies, Atlanta, GA, April.

Bassett

R. L.

Cianfarano

Hohmes

Medeiros

Novelli

Phillips Stewart

(2014). Moral Foundations Theory and Standards of Justice. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Criminal Justice, Roberts Wesleyan College, Rochester, NY.

Beck

(2011). Unclean: Meditations on Purity, Hospitality, and Mortality. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Beck

McDonald

(2004). Attachment to God: The Attachment to God Inventory, tests of working model correspondence, and an exploration of faith group differences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32(2), 92–103.

Brint

Abrutyn

(2010). Who’s right about the Right? Comparing competing explanations of the link between white evangelicals and conservative politics in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(2), 328–350.

Davies

C. L.

Sibley

C. G.

Liu

J. H.

(2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the moral foundations questionnaire: Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45, 431–436.

Davis

D. E.

Dooley

M. T.

Hook

J. N.

Choe

McElroy

S. E.

(2017). The purity/sanctity subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire does not work similarly for religious versus non-religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9, 124–130.

Democratic Party Platform (2016). Retrieved July 12, 2018 from https://www.democrats.org/party-platform.

10.

Fuller Studio (n.d.). Women in the Pentecostal movement. Retrieved July 12, 2018 from https://fullerstudio.fuller.edu/women-in-the-pentecostal-movement/.

11.

Gonsoulin

M. E.

(2010). Gender ideology and status attainment of conservative Christian women in the 21st Century. Sociological Spectrum, 30(2), 220–240.

12.

Gorsuch

R. L.

McPherson

S. E.

(1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(3), 348–354.

13.

Graham

Haidt

(2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.

14.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.

15.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

(2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: Exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e50092.

16.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385.

17.

Green

(2017). A conservative Christian battle over gender. The Atlantic. Retrieved 12 July 2018 from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/truths-table-gender-race/532407/

18.

Greene

J. D.

(2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin.

19.

Haidt

(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

20.

Haidt

(2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.

21.

Haidt

Graham

(2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

22.

Haidt

Joseph

(2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus: Special Issue on Human Nature, 133(4), 55–66.

23.

IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

24.

Iyer

Koleva

Graham

Ditto

Haidt

(2012). Understanding Libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified Libertarians. Plos One, 7(8): e42366.

25.

Johnson

K. A.

Hook

J. N.

Davis

D. E.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Sandage

S. J.

Crabtree

S. A.

(2016). Moral foundation priorities reflect U.S. Christians’ individual differences in religiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100(1), 56–61.

26.

Kelly

H. L.

Sutton

G. W.

Hicks

Godfrey

Gillihan

(2018). Factors influencing Christians’ moral appraisals of nontraditional sexuality. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 37(2), 162–177.

27.

Khan

S. R.

Stagnaro

M. N.

(2016). The influence of multiple group identities on moral foundations. Journal of Ethics and Behavior, 26(3), 194–214.

28.

King

P. M.

Mayhew

M. J.

(2002). Moral judgement development in higher education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 247–270.

29.

Kohlberg

Hersh

R. H.

(1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16, 53–59.

30.

Krull

D. S.

(2016). Religiosity and moral foundations: Differing views about the basis for right and wrong. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 35, 41–51.

31.

Nae.net (2015). NAE/LifeWay Research publish Evangelical beliefs research definition ( November 19). Retrieved December 4, 2018 from https://www.nae.net/evangelical-beliefs-research-definition/.

32.

Pérez

E. O.

(2015). Ricochet: How elite discourse politicizes racial and ethnic identities. Political Behavior, 37(1), 155–180.

33.

Pew Forum (2011). Global Survey of Evangelical Protestant Leaders. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from http://www.pewforum.org/2011/06/22/global-survey-of-evangelical-protestant-leaders/.

34.

Pew Forum (2015). Women who are Christian. Retrieved July 12, 2018 from http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/christians/christian/gender-composition/women/.

35.

Piaget

(1997) The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: Free Press.

36.

Piazza

Landy

J. F.

(2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(6), 639–661.

37.

Qualtrics (2015). Qualtrics software, higher education version. Provo, UT. Available from http://www.qualtrics.com.

38.

Republican Platform (2016). Retrieved July 12, 2018 from https://www.gop.com/platform/.

39.

Sheets

Domke

D. S.

Greenwald

A. G.

(2011). God and country: The partisan psychology of the presidency, religion, and nation. Political Psychology, 32(3), 459–484.

40.

Sutton

(2016). A House Divided: Sexuality, Morality, and Christian Cultures. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.

41.

Sutton

G. W.

Arnzen

Kelly

(2016). Christian counseling and psychotherapy: Components of clinician spirituality that predict type of Christian intervention. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 35, 204–214.

42.

Sutton

G. W.

Jordan

Worthington

E. L.

Jr. (2014). Spirituality, hope, compassion, and forgiveness: Contributions of Pentecostal spirituality to godly love. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 33, 212–226.

43.

Sutton

G. W.

Kelly

Worthington

E. L.

Jr. Griffin

B. J.

Dinwiddie

(2018). Satisfaction with Christian psychotherapy and well-being: Contributions of hope, personality, and spirituality. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 5(1), 8–24.

44.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

Austin

W. G.

(Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

45.

Williamson

W. P.

Hood

R. W.

Jr. Ahmad

Sadiq

Hill

P. C.

(2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the big 5 factor markers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 721–747.

46.

You

Maeda

Bebeau

M. J.

(2011). Gender differences in moral sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 21(4), 263–282.