To increase student engagement and enhance critical thinking and deep understanding, I supplemented weekly seminar meetings with focused Web-based discussions of issues in a “Race and Education” senior sociology seminar. These Web-based discussions were structured by specific questions and discussion roles. Before seminar, Staters posted on the course Web site the most important thing they learned from a reading, describing what was most difficult, and raising new sociological questions. After seminar, Responders replied to the questions and difficulties posted and posed further sociological questions. Two days later, Integrators synthesized and integrated what they had learned that week from others' postings, readings, and seminar discussion, and raised further questions. Analysis of student postings suggests that students' engagement with the ideas of others increased during the semester and their thinking became more complex. This paper discusses the processes that contributed to students' learning and suggested pedagogical changes. It also raises questions for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlthauserRobertDarnallKim2001.
“Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing Through Peer Reviews: An Exploration of Assisted Performance.”
Teaching Sociology29:
23–35.
2.
BarghJohn A.SchulYaacov1980.
“On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching.”
Journal of Educational Psychology72:
593–604.
3.
BassRandy1998-99.
“The Scholarship of Teaching: What's the Problem?”
Inventio: Creative Thinking about Learning and Teaching 1.
Retrieved October 31, 2003 (http://www.doit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/randybass.htm)
4.
BassRandyEynonBret1998.
“Teaching Culture, Learning Culture, and New Media Technologies: An Introduction and Framework.”
Pp. 11–96 in
Works and Daysvol. S31/32, edited by BassRandyDerricksonTeresaEynonBretSampleMarkIndiana PA: English Department, 110 Leonard Hall, Indiana University of Pennsylvania
5.
BeanJohn C.1996.
Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
6.
BensonDenzel E.HaneyWavaOreTracy E.PersellCaroline HodgesSchulteAileenSteeleJamesWinfieldIdee2002.
“Thinking Sociologically about Digital Technology, Teaching, and Learning: What We Know and What We Need to Know.”
Teaching Sociology30:
140–57.
7.
BenstonJanette B.2000.
“Web-Based Learning: Making Thinking Public.”
Paper presented at the Carnegie Foundation CASTLE Workshop, June 21, San Jose, CA
8.
BenwareCarlDeciEdward L.1984.
“Quality of Learning with an Active versus Passive Motivational Set.”
American Educational Research Journal21:
755–65.
9.
BillsonJanet Mancini1986.
“The College Classroom as a Small Group: Some Implications for Teaching and Learning.”
Teaching Sociology14:
143–51.
10.
BransfordJohnBrownAnn L.CockingRodney R.2000.
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.Expanded Edition.
Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press
11.
BrowneM. NeilKeeleyStuart M.1998.
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
12.
BruffeeKenneth A.1984.
“Collaborative Learning and the Conversation of Mankind.”
College English46:
635–52.
13.
BruffeeKenneth A.1993.
Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press
14.
CollinsAllanBrownJohn SeelyHolumAnn1991.
“Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Thinking Visible.”
American Educator15:6–12, 38–47
15.
CroneJames A.2001.
“Attaining More and Greater Depth of Discussion in the Undergraduate Classroom: The Seminar and Seminar Paper.”
Teaching Sociology29:
229–36.
16.
Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration.2000.
“Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion.”
Retrieved October 31, 2003
(http://search.ntia.doc.gov/pdf/fttn00.pdf)
17.
Ebbinghaus, Hermann [1885]1913.
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology.
Translated by Henry A. Ruger and Clara E. Bussenius.
New York: Teachers College, Columbia University
18.
EboBosah1998.
Cyberghetto or Cybertopia?Westport, CT: Praeger
19.
FlynnElizabethMcCulleyGeorge A.GratzRonald K.1982.
“Effects of Peer Critiquing and Model Analysis on the Quality of Biology Student Laboratory Reports.”
ERIC
document # 234 403
20.
GardnerHoward1993.
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.New York: Basic Books
21.
GroelingTim1999.
“Virtual Discussion—Web-based Discussion Forums in Political Science.”
in
Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association,
vol. 2000. Retrieved October 31, 2003 (http://weber.ucsd.edu/~tgroelin/virtdisc.pdf)
22.
HalperneDiane1998.
“Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains. Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.”
American Psychologist53:
449–55.
23.
HargittaiEszter
In press.
“The Digital Divide and What to Do about It.”
In
The New Economy Handbook
edited by JonesDerek C.New York: Reed Elsevier
24.
Hedegaard, Marianne.1990.
“The Zone of Proximal Development as a Basis for Instruction.”
Pp. 349–71 in
Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Socio-historical Psychology
edited by MollL. C.New York: Cambridge University Press
25.
HutchingsPat1998.
The Course Portfolio: How Faculty Can Examine Their Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning.Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education
26.
JaffeeDavid1997.
“Asynchronous Learning: Technology and Pedagogical Strategy in a Distance Learning Course.”
Teaching Sociology25:
262–77.
27.
JohnsonDiane Elizabeth2001.
“Teaching for Mastery: Focus on Social Theory.”
Teaching Sociology29:
163–80.
28.
KellyT. Mills2000.
“For Better or Worse? The Marriage of Web and Classroom.”
Pp. 53–61 in
Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
edited by HutchingsP.Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
29.
KurfissJoanne G.1988.
Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilitiesvol. No. 2. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education
30.
McKeachieWilbert J.1994.
Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers.Lexington, MA: DC Heath
31.
McMillanJames H.1987.
“Enhancing College Students' Critical Thinking: A Review of Studies.”
Research in Higher Education26:
3–29.
32.
MollLuis C.GreenbergJames B.1990.
“Creating Zones of Possibilities: Combining Social Contexts for Instruction.”
Pp. 319–48 in
Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Socio-historical Psychology
edited by MollL. C.New York: Cambridge University Press
33.
MolmLinda D.CookKaren S.1995.
“Social Exchange and Exchange Networks.”
Pp. 209–35 in
Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology
edited by CookKaren S.FineGary A.HouseJames S.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
34.
NardiBonnieO'DayVicki1999.
Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
35.
NelsonCraig1994.
“Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning.”
Pp. 45–57 in
Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques
edited by BosworthKrisHamiltonSharon J.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
36.
NelsonCraig1999.
“On the Persistence of Unicorns: The Trade-Off between Content and Critical Thinking Revisited.”
Pp. 168–84 in
The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century
edited by PescosolidoBernice A.AminzadeRonaldThousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press
37.
NunnClaudia E.1996.
“Discussion in the College Classroom: Triangulating Observational and Survey Results.”
Journal of Higher Education67:
243–66.
38.
PerryWilliam G.Jr.1970.
Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
39.
PerryWilliam G.Jr.1981.
“Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning.”
Pp. 76–116 in
The Modern American College,
edited by ChickeringArthur W.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
40.
Persell, Caroline Hodges.1992.
“Bringing PCs into Introductory Sociology Courses: First Steps, Missteps, and Future Prospects.”
Teaching Sociology20:
93–105.
41.
Persell, Caroline Hodges.2002.
“Digital Technologies and Competing Models of Higher Education.”
Pp. 71–83 in
The McDonaldization of Higher Education,
edited by WynyardRobinHayesDennisWestport, CT: Bergin and Garvey, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc
42.
RauWilliamHeylBarbara S.1990.
“Humanizing the College Classroom: Collaborative Learning and Social Organization among Students.”
Teaching Sociology18:
141–55.
43.
SalvatoriMariolina Rizzi2000.
“Difficulty: The Great Educational Divide.”
Pp. 81–93 in
Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,
edited by HutchingsPatMenlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Scheinberg, Cynthia.2000.
“Using ‘Conversacolor’ in Teaching.”
Paper presented at Carnegie Scholar CASTL workshop, June 16, San Jose, CA
46.
Scheinberg, Cynthia.2001.
“‘Conversacolor’ as a form of ‘Cognitive Apprenticeship:’ Connecting Class Discussion to College Writing Skills.”
Mills College, Oakland, CA. Unpublished manuscript
47.
SchutteJerald G.1996.
“Virtual Teaching in Higher Education: The New Intellectual Superhighway or Just Another Traffic Jam?”
(2000). Retrieved October 31, 2003 (http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm)
48.
SnowDavid A.1999.
“1998 PSA Presidential Address: The Value of Sociology.”
Sociological Perspectives42:
1–22.
49.
TatumBeverly Daniel1997.
“Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?”
New York: Basic Books
50.
TharpRoland G.GallimoreRonald1988.
Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context.New York: Cambridge University Press
51.
VanDusenGerald C.2000.
Digital Dilemma: Issues of Access, Cost, and Quality In Media-Enhanced and Distance Education.
ASHEERIC Higher Education Report, 27(5).
New York: Jossey-Bass
52.
VygotskyLev S.1978.
Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Translated by Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner, and Ellen Souberman.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
53.
WeastDon1996.
“Alternative Teaching Strategies: The Case for Critical Thinking.”
Teaching Sociology24:
189–94.
54.
WigginsGrantMcTigheJay1998.
Understanding by Design.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
55.
WinieckiDonald J.1999.
“Keeping the Thread: Adapting Conversational Practice to Help Distance Students and Instructors Manage Discussions in an Asynchronous Learning Network.”
DEOSNEWS Archives9 (2).
Retrieved December 13, 2003 (http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews/deosnews9_2.asp)
56.
ZuboffShoshana1988.
In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power.New York: Basic Books
