This research examined corporate front-group stealth campaigns. An experiment was conducted to examine the influence of front-group stealth campaigns on a variety of measures. It was anticipated that corporate front-group stealth campaigns, which feature names that mask the true interests of sponsors, positively affect public opinion, unless they are exposed as intentionally misleading, in which case they boomerang against sponsors. The experiment examined the potential of the inoculation strategy to preempt the influence of corporate front-group stealth campaigns. The pattern of results supported all of these expectations. Front-group stealth campaigns proved to be effective, at least in the short term. Front-group stealth campaigns eroded public attitudes toward the issue in question and boosted perceptions of the front group, but not the corporate sponsor. However, when front-group stealth campaigns were subsequently exposed, positive effects dissipated and perceptions of corporate sponsors boomeranged. Results revealed that inoculation can protect against the influence of front-group stealth campaigns.
An, C., & Pfau, M. (2004). The efficacy of inoculation in televised political debates. Journal of Communication, 54, 421-436.
2.
Arendt, H. (1958). Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Viking.
3.
Beder, S. (1998). Global spin: The corporate assault on environmentalism (2nd ed.). White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
4.
Behind the lines: Esso's claim to care about the environment. (2002, November). Ecologist, 11-11.
5.
Bernays, E. L. (1923). Crystallizing public opinion. New York: Boni and Liveright.
6.
Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. New York: H. Liveright.
7.
Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 269-309.
8.
Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27-39.
9.
Burgoon, M., Pfau, M., & Birk, T. (1995). An inoculation theory explanation for the effects of corporate issue/advocacy advertising campaigns. Communication Research, 22, 485-505.
10.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-756.
11.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 241-256.
13.
Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2004). Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 343-364.
14.
Cone. (2004). Multi-year study finds 21% increase in Americans who say corporate support of social issues is important in building trust. Retrieved November 12, 2005, from www.coneinc.com
15.
Crossen, C. (1994). Tainted truth: The manipulation of fact in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
Dahl, R. A. (1963). Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
DePaulo, B. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86.
19.
Dowling, G. (2001). Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image, and performance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
21.
Ellwanger, S. (2006, April 10). Tip sheet: Lies, smears & dirty tricks: An ugly (but true) PR story. PR News, p. 1-1.
Ewen, S. (1996). PR! A social history of spin. New York: HarperCollins.
24.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Gardiner, M. P., Mitchell, A. A., Russo, J. E. (1985). Low involvement strategies for processing advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 14, 44-56.
27.
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social influence and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685-694.
28.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
29.
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In. A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: The meaning of truth. New York: Longmans Green.
31.
James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover Publications.
32.
Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
33.
Keating, J. P., & Brock, T. C. (1974). Acceptance of persuasion and the inhibition of counterargumentation under various distraction tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 301-309.
34.
Kiesler, S. B., & Mathog, R. (1968). The distraction hypothesis in attitude change. Psychological Reports, 23, 1123-1133.
35.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 196-210.
37.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Free Press.
38.
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63-76.
39.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
41.
McGuire, W. J. (1961a). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184-197.
42.
McGuire, W. J. (1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326-332.
43.
McGuire, W. J. (1962). Persistence of the resistance to persuasion induced by various types of prior belief defenses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 241-248.
44.
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
45.
McGuire, W. J. (1966). Persistence of the resistance to persuasion induced by various types of prior belief defenses. In C. W. Backman & P. F. Secord (Eds.), Problems in social psychology (pp. 128-135). New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
McGuire, W. J. (1970, February). A vaccine for brainwash. Psychology Today, 36–39, 63–64.
47.
McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24-34.
48.
Mokhiber, R. (2000, July/August). Fronting for PhRMA. Multinational Monitor, 21, 38-38.
49.
Osterhouse, R. A., & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 344-358.
50.
Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 475-481.
51.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude-change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
52.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
53.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-148.
54.
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
55.
Pfau, M. (1992). The potential of inoculation in promoting resistance to the effectiveness of comparative advertising messages. Communication Quarterly, 40, 26-44.
56.
Pfau, M. (1997). Inoculation model of resistance to influence. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 133-171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57.
Pfau, M., & Burgoon, M. (1988). Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 91-111.
58.
Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., Wittenberg, E. M., An, C., Ferguson, M., et al. (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility: Do they trigger distinct or overlapping processes of resistance?Human Communication Research, 30, 329-360.
59.
Pfau, M., Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M., & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation messages in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 1-12.
60.
Pfau, M., Park, D., Holbert, R. L., & Cho, J. (2001). The effects of party- and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2379-2397.
61.
Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Kerr-Hsin, L., et al. (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance. Communication Monographs, 70, 39-51.
62.
Pfau, M., Szabo, E. A., Anderson, J., Morrill, J., Zubric, J., & Wan, H. (2001). The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 27, 216-252.
63.
Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Koerner, A. F., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Penaloza, L. J., et al. (1997). Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance. Human Communication Research, 24, 187-215.
64.
Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
PRSA speaking out on abuses. (1995, March 20). PR News, p. 1-1.
66.
PRSA's stand on front groups. (2004, October). Public Relations Tactics, 14-14.
67.
Quindlen, A. (2004, July 12). Foul mouth and manhood. Newsweek, 76-76.
68.
Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. (2001). Trust us we're experts: How industry manipulates science and gambles with your future. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
69.
Reilly, M. (2003, April 21). Politics makes strange bedfellows: It's a strategy that works. PR News, p. 1-1.
70.
Schlenker, B. R. (2003). Self-presentation. In M. K. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 492-518). New York: Guilford.
71.
Sears, D. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
72.
Stauber, J., & Rampton, S. (1995). Toxic sludge is good for you! Lies, damn lies, and the public relations industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
73.
Stroh, P. K. (1995). Voters are pragmatic cognitive misers: The accuracy-effort trade-off in the candidate evaluation process. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 207-228). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
74.
Third-party endorsements help drive successful campaigns. (2003, April 14). PR News, p. 1-1.
75.
Todorov, A., Chaiken, S., & Henderson, M. D. (2002). The heuristic-systematic model of social information processing. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 195-211). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
Wan, H.-H., & Pfau, M. (2004). The relative effectiveness of inoculation, bolstering, and combined approaches in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 301-328.
77.
Wilcox, D. L., Cameron, G. T., Ault, P. H., & Agee, W. K. (2003). Public relations: Strategies & tactics (7th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
78.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.
