Empirical studies of citizen communication networks and participation go as far back as the 1940s, with a bolder focus in political—not civic—activities. A consistent finding reveals that individuals with larger networks are more engaged than those with smaller networks. This article expands this line of work with a number of novel tests. First, it compares the predictive power of online versus offline network size on civic engagement. It then explores the role of strong-tie versus weak-tie discussion frequency and participatory behaviors. Finally, it examines the extent to which the contribution of network size, both online and offline, on civic engagement is mediated by discussion with weak ties. Using original survey data from a large national sample of U.S. adults, results indicate that (1) the relationships between online and offline network size and civic engagement are positive and fairly similar in strength, (2) weak-tie discussion is the strongest predictor of civic behaviors, (3) weak-tie discussion largely mediates the association between participation and network size online and offline, and (4) online networks entail greater exposure to weak ties than offline networks.
American Association of Public Opinion Research. ( 2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/uploads/Standard_Definitions_04_08_Final.pdf
2.
Bachmann, I., Kaufhold, K., Lewis, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). News platform preference: Advancing the effects of age and media consumption on political participation . International Journal of Internet Science5(1), 34-47.
3.
Bargh, J.A., & McKenna, K. ( 2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.
4.
Bennett, W.L. ( 2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
5.
Berger, C.R. ( 2009). Interpersonal communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 260-279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Burns, N., Schlozman, K.L., & Verba, S. ( 2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Campbell, D.E. ( 2006). Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Citrin, J. ( 1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government . American Political Science Review, 68, 973-988.
9.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
10.
Correa, T., Willard Hinsley, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.
11.
Delli Carpini, M.X., Cook, F.L., & Jacobs, L.R. ( 2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
12.
Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. ( 1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters . New Haven: Yale University Press .
13.
Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. ( 1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
14.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. ( 2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
15.
Enns, S., Malinick, T., & Matthews, R. ( 2008). It’s not only who you know, it’s also where they are: Using the position generator to investigate the structure of access to embedded resources. In N. Lin & B. H. Erickson (Eds.), Social capital: An international research program (pp. 255-307). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
Eveland, W.P.J. ( 2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from non-election, off-year election, and presidential election contexts . Communication Research, 28, 571-601.
17.
Eveland, W.P. ( 2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177-193.
18.
Eveland, W.P., & Hively, M.H. ( 2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and "heterogeneity" of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224.
19.
Gastil, J., & Dillard, J.P. ( 1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation . Political Communication, 16(1), 3-23.
20.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2007). Reshaping the digital inequality in the European Union: How psychological variables affect Internet adoption rates. Webology, 3(4).
22.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2009). Blogs, journalism and political participation. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.) Journalism and citizenship: New agendas (pp. 108-123). New York, NY : Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. , Puig-I-Abril, E., & Rojas, H. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media Society, 11, 553-574.
24.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. , & Rojas, H. (2010). Análisis de los efectos de los blogs en la sociedad de la información. Comunicación y Ciudadanía, 2(3), 60-71.
25.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. , Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Re-imagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 36-51.
26.
Gil de Zúñiga, H. , & Valenzuela , S. (2010). "Who uses Facebook and why". In Wittkower, D. (Eds.) Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on your Mind? (pp. XXXI-XXXVII). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
27.
Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. ( 1998). The handbook of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Göritz, A.S., Reinhold, N., & Batinic, B. ( 2002). Online panels. In B. Batinic, U.-D. Reips, M. Bosnjak & A. Werner (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 27-47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe.
29.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
30.
Habermas, J. ( 2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research, Communication Theory, 16, 411-426.
31.
Harlow, R.E., & Cantor, N. ( 1996). Still participating after all these years: A study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1235-1249.
32.
Helliwell, J.F., & Putnam, R.D. ( 2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1435-1446.
33.
Hill, K.A., & Hughes, J.E. ( 1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
34.
Holbert, R.L. ( 2005). Television news viewing, governmental scope, and postmaterialist spending: Assessing mediation by partisanship. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 416-434.
35.
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P.A., Dalton, R.J., & Levine, J. ( 1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1025-1054.
36.
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K.S. ( 2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39.
37.
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Effects of citizen and professional journalism on political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly87(3), 515-529.
39.
Kavanaugh, A., Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Zin, T.T., & Reese, D.D. ( 2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online [Electronic Version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 10. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue14/kavanaugh.html
40.
Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. ( 2002). The impact of computer networks on social capital and community involvement. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 325-344). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
41.
Kavanaugh, A., Reese, D., Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. ( 2005). Weak ties in networked communities. Information Society, 21, 119-131.
42.
Keller, E., & Berry, J. ( 2003). The influentials. New York, NY: Free Press.
43.
Kenny, C.B. ( 1994). The microenvironment of attitude change. Journal of Politics, 56, 715-728.
44.
Kim, J., Wyatt, R.O., & Katz, E. ( 1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication , 16, 361-385.
45.
Klofstad, C.A. ( 2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 180-191.
46.
Kraut, R.E., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. ( 1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist , 53, 1017-1031.
47.
Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. ( 1998). Social networks, social capital, and political participation . Political Psychology, 19, 567-584.
48.
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. ( 1948). The people’s choice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
49.
Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2002). Belonging in geographic, ethnic and Internet spaces. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 404-427). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
50.
McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E.M., Holbert, R.L., Zhang, W., & Zubric, J. ( 1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26, 743-774.
51.
McLeod, J.M., Zubric, J., Keum, H., Deshpande, S., Cho, J., Stein, S., & Heather, M. ( 2001, August). Reflecting and connecting: Testing a communication mediation model of civic participation. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
52.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M.E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
53.
Miller, A.H. ( 1974a). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970 . American Political Science Review, 68, 951-972.
54.
Miller, A.H. ( 1974b). Rejoinder to "comment" by Jack Citrin: Political discontent or ritualism? American Political Science Review, 68, 989-1001.
55.
Mutz, D.C. ( 2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Newton, K. ( 1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise? British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577-599.
57.
Nie, N.H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Berry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Norris, P. ( 2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Pavot, W.G., Diener, E., Colvin, C.R., & Sandvik, E. ( 1991). Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149-161.
60.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. ( 2009). About our survey methodology in detail. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/methodology/about/
61.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1996, Winter). The strange disappearance of civic America. American Prospect, 24, 34-48.
62.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York, NY: Simon & Schuster .
63.
Rojas, H. ( 2008). Strategy versus understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452-480.
64.
Rojas, H., Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Schmierbach, M., Keum, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2005). Media dialogue: Perceiving and addressing community problems. Mass Communication & Society, 8, 93-110.
65.
Sax, L.J., Gilmartin, S.K., & Bryant, A.N. ( 2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409-432.
66.
Schmitt-Beck, R. ( 2004) "Political Communication Effects: The Impact of Mass Media and Personal Conversations on Voting." In Comparing Political Communication . Theories, Cases and Challenges. In Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Scott, J. ( 1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London, UK: SAGE.
68.
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Kwak, N. ( 2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research , 32, 531-565.
69.
Shah, D.V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R.L. ( 2001). "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
70.
Smith, A., Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. ( 2009). The internet and civic engagement. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/15--The-Internet-and-Civic-Engagement.aspx
71.
Son, J., & Lin, N. ( 2008). Social capital and civic action: A network-based approach . Social Science Research, 37, 330-349.
72.
Uslaner, E.M. ( 1998). Social capital, television, and the "mean world": Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441-467.
73.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K.F. ( 2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875-901.
74.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
Weatherford, M.S. ( 1982). Interpersonal networks and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 117-143.
76.
Wellman, B. ( 1982). Studying personal communities. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 61-80). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
77.
Wellman, B. ( 1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. ( 2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436-455.
79.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli-Carpini, M.X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
