Memorable Messages About Retirement,Own Communication About Financial Preparations for Retirement,and Successful Aging: Testing Theoretical Mechanisms in the Communicative Ecology Model of Successful Aging

Abstract

This study addressed how communication about retirement fits in the communicative ecology model of successful aging (CEMSA). U.S. American older adults (N = 294, M_Age = 59.27 years) reported on a memorable message they heard about retirement, as well as on their own talk about how they can be financially prepared for retirement. Older adults who wrote a memorable message with a theme of (a) saving money for retirement or (b) relaxing or enjoying life during retirement reported talking about how they can be financially prepared for retirement more than did older adults who did not write a memorable message with one of these themes. Older adults’ talk about how they can be financially prepared for retirement was indirectly associated with successful aging, via the serial mediators of positive affect about aging and aging efficacy. Talking about how one can be financially prepared for retirement may be a worthwhile theoretical addition to the CEMSA.

Keywords

communicative ecology model of successful aging memorable messages retirement finances uncertainty discrepancies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afifi

W. A.

Matsunaga

(2008). Uncertainty management theories: Three approaches to a multifarious process. In Baxter

L. A.

Braithwaite

D. O.

(Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 117–132). Sage.

Afifi

W. A.

Weiner

J. L.

(2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x

Anderson

L. B.

Gettings

P. E.

(2020). Examining young adults’ expectations for retirement: An emerging tension. Communication Studies, 71(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1691619

Badache

A. C.

Hachem

Mäki-Torkko

(2023). The perspectives of successful ageing among older adults aged 75+: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis of mixed studies. Ageing and Society, 43(5), 1203–1239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001070

Bernhold

Q. S.

(2022). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their role in the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Quarterly, 70(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.2023602

Bernhold

Q. S.

Bertram

Devereux

Blue

Julius

(2024). Explicating the pathways among memorable message themes about religion and spirituality, positive role models for aging, and successful aging. Southern Communication Journal, 89(3–4), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2024.2370766

Bernhold

Q. S.

Blue

Devereux

Bertram

Julius

(2025). Expanding the boundary conditions of the communicative ecology model of successful aging to include communication about religion. Communication Research, 52(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231165844

Bernhold

Q. S.

Gasiorek

(2020). Older adults’ perceptions of their own and their romantic partners’ age-related communication and their associations with aging well, depressive symptoms, and alcohol use disorder symptoms. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(4), 1172–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519890413

Bernhold

Q. S.

Gasiorek

Giles

(2020). Communicative predictors of older adults’ successful aging, mental health, and alcohol use. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 90(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018784715

10.

Bernhold

Q. S.

Giles

(2019). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about aging and their associations with successful aging. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 474–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz011

11.

Bernhold

Q. S.

McClure

Blue

Devereux

Burns

(2026). Older adults’ recalled memorable messages about death, dying, and the afterlife and their associations with successful aging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 45(1), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X251364007

12.

Croucher

S. M.

Kelly

Ashwell

Condon

S. M.

(2024). Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: A four nation comparison. Communication Research Reports, 41(4), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2024.2396293

13.

DeAndrea

D. C.

Holbert

R. L.

(2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163

14.

Fowler

Gasiorek

Giles

(2015). The role of communication in aging well: Introducing the communicative ecology model of successful aging. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1024701

15.

Franklin

C. S.

Cody

P. A.

Ballan

(2010). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. In Thyer

(Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 355–374). Sage.

16.

Gasiorek

Fowler

(2016). Profiling younger adults’ communication about aging. Communication Studies, 67(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121159

17.

Gasiorek

Fowler

(2020). Effects of “environmental chatter” about age and aging on middle-aged and older adults’ communication and perceptions of aging efficacy. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1637930

18.

Gasiorek

Fowler

(2022). Associations between parents’ negative talk about aging and young adults’ negative affect and efficacy related to aging. Journal of Family Communication, 22(4), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2108428

19.

Gasiorek

Fowler

Giles

(2015). What does successful aging sound like? Profiling communication about aging. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12060

20.

Gasiorek

Fowler

Giles

(2016). Communication and successful aging. In Nussbaum

J. F.

(Ed.), Communication across the lifespan: ICA theme book (pp. 35–50). Peter Lang.

21.

Gasiorek

Fowler

Giles

(2019). Communication and successful aging: Testing alternative conceptualizations of uncertainty. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02637751.2018.1538561

22.

Gettings

P. E.

(2019). Meanings of talk about the transition to retirement: Connecting macro and micro discourses. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1614203

23.

Gettings

P. E.

Anderson

L. B.

(2021). An organizational socialization perspective on young adults’ ideas about retirement: Examining sources of retirement information, meanings of retirement, and source-meaning associations. Work, Aging, and Retirement, 7(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa019

24.

Gettings

P. E.

Kuang

(2022). Extending the communicative ecology model of successful aging using talk about careers and retirement. Communication Monographs, 89(4), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.2025410

25.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.

26.

Holladay

S. J.

(2002). “Have fun while you can,” “You’re only as old as you feel,” and “Don’t ever get old”: An examination of memorable messages about aging. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.4.681

27.

Knapp

M. L.

Stohl

Reardon

K. K.

(1981). “Memorable” messages. Journal of Communication, 31(4), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1460-2466.1981.tb00448.x

28.

Mee

L. H.

(2025, September 17). Prolific: Setting standards for authentic human data collection. https://www.prolific.com/resources/prolific-setting-standards-for-authentic-human-data-collection

29.

Morse

J. M.

(1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239500500201

30.

Muthén

B. O.

(2016, February 5). Path analysis (direct, indirect, and total effects). http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/11/8245.html?1454722789

31.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

32.

Naeem

Ozuem

Howell

Ranfagni

(2024). Demystification and actualisation of data saturation in qualitative research through thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241229777

33.

Pusateri

K. B.

Roaché

D. J.

Kam

J. A.

(2016). Grandparents’ and young adult grandchildren’s identity gaps and perceived caregiving intentions: An actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514568750

34.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

35.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

Austin

W. G.

(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.

36.

Teater

Chonody

J. M.

(2020). How do older adults define successful aging? A scoping review. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 91(4), 599–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415019871207

37.

Triandis

H. C.

(1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.

38.

Vargas

J. H.

Kemmelmeier

(2013). Ethnicity and contemporary American culture: A meta-analytic investigation of horizontal-vertical individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443733

39.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—expanded form. Unpublished manuscript.

40.

Wennekers

Thurik

van Stel

Noorderhaven

(2007). Uncertainty avoidance and the rate of business ownership across 21 OECD countries, 1976–2004. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-006-0045-1

41.

J. S.

(2021). Revisiting Hofstede’s uncertainty-avoidance dimension: A cross-cultural comparison of organizational employees in four countries. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 21(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v21i1.5

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB