Little is known about the stability of modus operandi (MO) in sexual offending. The authors studied a cohort of all sexual offenders released from prison into the Swedish community during the years from 1993 to 1997 (N = 1,303) and analyzed sexual reoffenders’ MO in terms of victim choice, offense nature, and severity, comparing prior offenses with those registered during an average 6-year follow-up. Stability in MO, explored with Cohen’s Kappa and Odds Ratios (ORs) as measures of agreement across registered sexual offenses, was high, specifically with respect to victim choice. Results are discussed in relation to sexual deviance and opportunity structure. The authors argue that assessment and management of sexual recidivism risk might benefit from information on offense MO. Furthermore, the results could inform police investigative strategies, such as linking multiple offenses committed by an unidentified offender.
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Mittelman, M., & Rouleau, J. L. (1988). Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 16, 153-168.
2.
Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3-25.
3.
Aylwin, A. S., Clelland, S. R., Kirkby, L., Reddon, J. R., Studer, L. H., & Johnston, J. (2000). Sexual offense severity and victim gender preference: A comparison of adolescent and adult sex offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 113-124.
4.
Bachman, R. (1998). The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 8-29.
5.
Canter, D., & Kirby, S. (1995). Prior convictions of child molesters. Science& Justice, 35, 73-78.
6.
Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
7.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
8.
Collins, P. I., Johnson, G. F., Choy, A., Davidson, K. T., & MacKay, R. E. (1998). Advances in violent crime analysis and law enforcement: The Canadian Violent Crime Linkage Analysis System. Journal of Governmental Information, 25, 277-284.
9.
Doren, D. (1998). Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the “Sexual Predator” Commitment Laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 97-114.
10.
Dvoskin, J. A., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). Editorial: Risk assessment and release decision-making: Toward resolving the great debate. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 6-10.
11.
Elliott, M., Browne, K., & Kilcoyne, J. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: What offenders tell us. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 579-594.
12.
Grubin, D., Kelly, P., & Brunsdon, C. (2001). Linking serious sexual assault through behavior. Home Office Research Study 215. London: Home Office.
13.
Grubin, D. H., & Kennedy, H. G. (1991). The classification of sexual offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 1, 123-129.
14.
Guay, J-P., Proulx, J., Cusson, M., & Ouimet, M. (2001). Victim-choice polymorphia among serious sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 521-533.
15.
Hanson, R. K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72.
16.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
17.
Hanson, R. K., Scott, H., & Steffy, R. A. (1995). A comparison of child molesters and nonsexual criminals: Risk predictors and long-term recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 325-337.
18.
Hazelwood, R. R. (2001). Analyzing the rape and profiling the offender. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (3rd ed., pp. 133-164). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19.
Kaufman, K. L., Hilliker, D. R., & Daleiden, E. L. (1996). Subgroup differences in the modus operandi of adolescent sexual offenders. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 1, 17-24.
20.
Langton, C. M., & Marshall, W. L. (2001). Cognitions in rapists: Theoretical patterns by typological breakdown. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 499-518.
21.
Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643-661.
22.
Simon, L. M. J. (1997). Do criminal offenders specialize in crime types?Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 35-53.
23.
Simon, L. M. J. (2000). An examination of the assumptions of specialization, mental disorder, and dangerousness in sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 275-308.
24.
Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629-645.
25.
Soothill, K., Francis, B., Sanderson, B., & Ackerley, E. (2000). Sex offenders: Specialists, generalists — or both? A 32-year criminological study. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 56-67.
26.
Studer, L. H., Clelland, S. R., Aylwin, A. S., Reddon, J. R., & Monro, A. (2000). Rethinking risk assessment for incest offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 15-22.
27.
Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., & McCormack, J. (1997). The assessment of rapists. Behaviour Change, 14, 39-54.
28.
Warren, J., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R. R., Gibbs, N. A., Trumbetta, S. L., & Cummings, A. (1999). Crime scene analysis and the escalation of violence in serial rape. Forensic Science International, 100, 37-56.
29.
Weinrott, M. R., & Saylor, M. (1991). Self-report of crimes committed by sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 286-300.
