Poor planning for reintegrating child molesters from prison to the community is a likely risk factor for sexual recidivism. The quality of reintegration planning was retrospectively measured for groups of recidivist (n = 30) and nonrecidivist (n = 30) child molesters who were individually matched on static risk level and time since release. Recidivists had significantly poorer reintegration planning scores than nonrecidivists, consistent with a previous study by the authors. Data from both studies were combined (total N = 141), and survival analyses showed that poor reintegration planning predicted an increased rate of recidivism. Accommodation, employment, and social support planning combined to predict recidivism, with predictive validity comparable to static risk models (area under the curve = .71). Summing these items yielded a scale of reintegration planning quality that differentiated well between recidivists and nonrecidivists and may have practical utility for risk assessment as an adjunct to static models.
Allan, M., Grace, R., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 347-367.
2.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J.S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
3.
Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
4.
Beech, A., & Ford, H. (2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 685-701.
5.
Beech, A.R., Fisher, D.D., & Thornton, D. (2003). Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 339-352.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Colman, R.A., & Widom, C.S. (2004). Childhood abuse and neglect and adult intimate relationships: A prospective study. Child Abuse & Neglect , 28, 1133-1151.
8.
Ducro, C., & Pham, T. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26.
9.
Graffam, J., Shinkfield, A., Lavelle, B., & McPherson, W. (2004). Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 147-171.
10.
Hammett, T.M., Roberts, C., & Kennedy, S. (2001). Health-related issues in prisoner reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 390-409.
11.
Hanson, R.K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72.
12.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual assault recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 1999-02). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
16.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
17.
Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2003). STATIC-99 coding rules revised-2003. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
18.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumiere, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
19.
Hepburn, J.R., & Griffin, M.L. (2004). The effect of social bonds on successful adjustment to probation: An event history analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 29, 46-75.
20.
Hudson, S., Wales, D., & Ward, T. (1998). Kia Marama: A treatment program for child molesters in New Zealand. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. Hudson , & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 17-28). New York: Plenum.
21.
Hudson, S.M., Wales, D.S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 101-117.
22.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-87.
23.
Larsen, J., Robertson, P., Hillman, D., & Hudson, S. (1998). Te Piriti: A bicultural model for treating child molesters in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 385-398). New York: Plenum.
24.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005a). The effect of Megan's law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49-66.
25.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005b). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
26.
Levenson, J.S., D'Amora, D.A., & Hern, A.L. (2007). Megan's law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587-602.
27.
Looman, J. (2006). Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 193-206.
28.
Lurigio, A.J., Rollins, A., & Fallon, J. (2004). The effects of serious mental illness on offender reentry. Federal Probation, 68, 45-52.
29.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
30.
Mercado, C.C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J.S. (2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community reentry. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 188-205.
31.
Nathan, L., Wilson, N., & Hillman, D. (2003). Te Whakakotahitanga: An evaluation of the Te Piriti Special Treatment Programme for child sex offenders in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Psychological Service, Department of Corrections . Retrieved April 23, 2008, from http://www.corrections.govt.nz/public/pdf/research/tepiriti/tewhaka.pdf
32.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Petrunik, M., & Deutschmann, L. (2008). The exclusion-inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 499-519.
34.
Reynolds, C.R., Willson, V.L., & Clark, P.L. (1983). A four-test short form of the WAIS-R for clinical screening. Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 111-116.
35.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
36.
Roberts, R., O'Connor, T., Dunn, J., & Golding, J. (2004). The effects of child sexual abuse in later family life: Mental health, parenting and adjustment of offspring. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 525-545.
37.
Seiter, R.P., & Kadela, K.R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360-388.
38.
Skelton, A., Riley, D., Wales, D., & Vess, J. (2006). Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: Development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 277-286.
39.
Taxman, F.S. (2004). The offender and reentry: Supporting active participation in reintegration. Federal Probation, 68, 31-35.
40.
Taxman, F.S., Young, D., & Byrne, J.M. (2002). Offender's views of reentry: Implications for processes, programs and services. College Park: University of Maryland, Bureau of Governmental Research.
41.
Ward, T., & Nee, C. (in press). Surfaces and depths: Evaluating the theoretical assumptions of cognitive skills programmes. Psychology, Crime, & Law .
42.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C.A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 34, 353-360.
43.
Widom, C.S. (1999). Posttraumatic stress disorder in abused and neglected children grown up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1223-1229.
44.
Widom, C.S., Marmorstein, N.R., & Raskin White, H. (2006). Childhood victimization and illicit drug use in middle adult-hood. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 394-403.
45.
Willis, G.M. & Grace, R.C. (2008). The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 218-240.
46.
Wilson, R.J., Huculak, B., & McWhinnie, A. (2002). Restorative justice innovations in Canada. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 363-380.
47.
Wilson, R.J., Picheca, J.E., & Prinzo, M. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high-risk sexual offenders: Part two-A comparison of recidivism rates. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 327-337.
48.
Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V.L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. New York: Cambridge University Press.
