Research and theory on the effects of fair procedures has gained popularity over the past decade. This is understandable given the inherent appeal of these ideas and the supporting evidence. Research suggests that authorities are able to secure compliance from subordinates when they use fair procedures and when they are viewed as legitimate. Unfortunately, empirical studies of procedural justice and legitimacy are hampered by weak measures of key theoretical constructs. The purpose of this study is to examine the measurement properties of procedural justice in a sample of inmates. Results show that a one-factor model of procedural justice fits the data well, though the authors find evidence of a method effect. Results also demonstrate important differences between the use of a summated procedural justice scale and a scale derived from a factor analysis. These findings illustrate the importance of paying careful attention to construct validity in measures of procedural justice.
Bradburn, N.M. ( 1983). Response effects. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Brown, T.A. ( 2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
3.
Butler, M., & Drake, D.H. ( 2007). Reconsidering respect: Its role in Her Majesty’s Prison Service. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 115-127.
4.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. ( 1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
5.
Casper, J.D., Tyler, T., & Fischer, B. ( 1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 3, 438-508.
6.
DuIulio, J. ( 1987). Governing prisons. New York: Free Press.
7.
Flora, D.B., & Curran, P.J. ( 2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491.
8.
Guttman, L. ( 1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis . Psychometrika, 19, 149-161.
9.
Hicks, A.J., & Lawrence, J.A. (2004). Procedural safeguards for young offenders: Views of legal professionals and adolescents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37, 401-418.
10.
Jackson, K.M., Mannix, E.A., Peterson, R.S., & Trochim, W. ( 2002, June). A multi-faceted approach to process conflict. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Salt Lake City, UT .
11.
Jackson, K.M., & Trochim, W. ( 2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods , 5, 307-336.
12.
Kaiser, H.F. ( 1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
13.
Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
14.
Leventhal, G.S. ( 1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
15.
Lind, E.A., & Earley, P.C. ( 1992). Procedural justice and culture. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 227-242.
16.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. ( 1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
17.
Luzzo, D.A. ( 1993). A multi-trait, multi-method analysis of three career path development measures. Career Development Quarterly, 41, 367-345.
18.
Maguire, E.R., & Johnson, D. ( 2009). Measuring public perceptions of the police: Dimensionality and discriminant validity. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Maguire, E.R., Johnson, D., & Kuhns, J. ( 2008). The meaning and measurement of legitimacy in procedural justice scholarship. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Muthén, B.O., du Toit, S.H.C., & Spisic, D. ( 1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
Parsons, T. ( 1951). The social system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23.
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L.W. ( 1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effects of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163-204.
24.
Pitoniak, M.J., Sireci, S.G., & Luecht, R.M. ( 2002). A multitrait-multimethod validity investigation of scores from a professional licensure examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 498-516.
25.
Reisig, M.D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M.G. ( 2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005-1028.
26.
Reisig, M.D., & Lloyd, C. ( 2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime. Police Quarterly, 12, 42-62.
27.
Reisig, M.D., & Mesko, G. ( 2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct . Psychology, Crime, and the Law, 15, 41-59.
28.
Sparks, J.R., & Bottoms, A.E. ( 1995). Legitimacy and order in prisons. British Journal of Sociology, 46, 45-62.
29.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T.R. ( 2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513-547.
30.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. ( 1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. New York: John Wiley.
31.
Trochim, W. ( 1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation . Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1-16.
32.
Tyler, T.R. ( 1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18, 51-74.
33.
Tyler, T.R. ( 1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103-135.
34.
Tyler, T.R. ( 1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Tyler, T.R. ( 2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431-505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Tyler, T.R. ( 2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84-99.
37.
Tyler, T.R. ( 2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322-342.
38.
Tyler, T.R., & Huo, Y.J. ( 2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
Tyler, T.R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G.C., & Woods, D. ( 2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law and Society Review , 41, 553-586.
40.
Tyler, T.R., & Smith, H. ( 1997). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 595-629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Tyler, T.R., & Wakslak, C. ( 2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42, 253-281.
42.
Useem, B., & Kimball, P. ( 1989). States of siege: U.S. prison riots 1971-1986. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Useem, B., & Reisig, M. ( 1999). Collective action in prisons: Protests, disturbances, and riots. Criminology, 37(4), 735-759.
44.
Woolf, L.J. ( 1991). Woolf report: Prison disturbances April 1990. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
