This study examines administrative protocols established by a ground‐level subunit in a complex organization during a 13‐year period. The protocols are identifiable, verifiable, and (for the questions examined in this study) objectively interpretable. The authors report tangible evidence that the subunit developed some of its own emergent organizational characteristics, consistent with predictions using a loose coupling model. Copresent, however, clear manifestations are also found of the subunit at certain times merely acting out unitary executive–style policy decisions that have been made at higher administrative levels in the organization.
BarronD.WestE.HannanM. (1994). A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York, 1914‐1990. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 381‐421.
5.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BowenM. (2008). Censoring science. New York: Dutton.
7.
BrannickT.CoghlanD. (2007). In defense of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59‐74.
8.
BurnbaumR. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
9.
ChandlerA. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ChavesM. (1996). Ordaining women: The diffusion of an organizational innovation. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 840‐873.
11.
CoghlanD.BrannickT. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
12.
DornD. (2007). Turning fifty: Sociological perspectives and the Pacific Sociological Association. Sociological Perspectives, 50(1), 1‐6.
13.
DurkheimE. (1964). The division of labor in society (SimpsonGeorge Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
14.
GlassmanR. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18, 83‐98.
15.
HageJ.PowersC. (1992). Post‐industrial lives. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
HannanM.FreemanJ. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
HeilbronJ.SeidelR. (1989). Lawrence and his laboratory: A history of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
HoffmanE. (2008). “Revenge” and “Rescue”: Workplace deviance in the taxicab industry. Sociological Inquiry, 78(2), 270‐289.
19.
HomansG. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace.
20.
LawlerE.ThyeS.YoonJ. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519‐549.
21.
LensV. (2007). Administrative justice in public welfare bureaucracies: Why citizens (don’t) complain. Administration and Society, 39(3), 382‐408.
22.
MorrillC. (1995). The executive way: Conflict management in corporations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
PaulA. (Ed.). (1972). Black Americans and the Supreme Court since Emancipation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24.
ParsonsT.PlattG. (1973). The American University. New York: Academic Press.
25.
RohrJ. (2002). Civil servants and their constitutions. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
26.
RushingW.ZaldM. (Eds.). (1976). Organizations and beyond: Selected essays of James B. Thompson. Lexington, MA: Lexington Press.
27.
SaxenianA. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
SteinmetzG. (2008). The colonial state as a social field. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 589‐612.
29.
StillmanR. (1974). The rise of the city manager. American Political Science Review, 46, 66‐80.
30.
SuttonJ.DobbinF.MeyerJ.ScottW. R. (1994). The legalization of the workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 944‐971.
31.
TurnerJ. (1997). The institutional order. New York: Longman.
32.
WeberM. (1946). From Max Weber (GerthH.MillsC. W., Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
