“Not Just a Number”: Promoting Belonging Through an In-Class Activity in a Large Course

Abstract

Background

Starting a new class at the beginning of the semester is daunting for some students. It can be even more overwhelming and isolating to be a student in a large, auditorium-style lecture hall with dozens, if not hundreds, of other students. This may lead many students to lack a sense of belonging in the university setting.

Objective

This study examined how creating and sharing a personalized collage representing themselves during an in-class activity may impact students’ sense of belonging in a large, lecture-style classroom.

Method

Undergraduate psychology students in an upper-division course (N = 138) completed a collage in-class activity on the first day of class. To determine the effectiveness of the activity, students self-reported their belonging using pre- (N = 49) and postmeasures (N = 26).

Results

The activity significantly increased students’ sense of belonging.

Conclusion

The activity shows promise as a cost-effective and feasible active-learning strategy to promote belonging; however, there are important limitations to consider. Future research is needed to expand upon the efficacy of the approach.

Teaching Implications

This in-class activity may be an effective and engaging way to promote belonging in undergraduate psychology students enrolled in large courses.

Keywords

creativity experiential learning pedagogy student engagement belonging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Tanner

(2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596

Benedict

B. C.

(2021). Using vision boards to reflect on relevant experiences and envision ideal futures. College Teaching, 69(4), 231–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1850411

Bettencourt

G. M.

(2021). “I belong because it wasn’t made for me”: Understanding working-class Students’ sense of belonging on campus. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(5), 760–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1872288

Blatchford

Bassett

Brown

(2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burton

Lent

(2016). The use of vision boards as a therapeutic intervention. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2015.1092901

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Brewer

D. J.

Gamoran

Willms

J. D.

(2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.003

Exeter

D. J.

Ameratunga

Ratima

Morton

Dickson

Hsu

Jackson

(2010). Student engagement in very large classes: The teachers’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903545058

10.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

11.

Fink

Frey

R. F.

Solomon

E. D.

(2020). Belonging in general chemistry predicts first-year undergraduates’ performance and attrition. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00053A

12.

Fink

Young

J. D.

Vuppala

N. K.

Frey

R. F.

(2023). Mixed-methods exploration of students’ written belonging explanations from general chemistry at a selective institution. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00166G

13.

FitzSimmons

(2014). On the importance of collaborative peer learning as a collective learning experience in Finnish higher education classrooms. Critical Education, 5(16), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v5i16.184565

14.

Francis

R. W. F.

(2012). Engaged: Making large classes feel small through blended learning instructional strategies that promote increased student performance. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 9(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v9i2.6910

15.

Gächter

Starmer

Tufano

(2015). Measuring the closeness of relationships: A comprehensive evaluation of the ‘inclusion of the other in the self’ scale. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0129478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129478

16.

Hausmann

L. R.

Schofield

J. W.

Woods

R. L.

(2009). Sense of belonging and persistence in White and African American first-year students. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9137-8

17.

Hennessey

B. A.

(2015). Creative behavior, motivation, environment and culture: The building of a systems model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.97

18.

Lynch

R. P.

Pappas

(2017). A model for teaching large classes: Facilitating a “small class feel”. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p199

19.

Pedler

M. L.

Willis

Nieuwoudt

J. E.

(2022). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1955844

20.

Runco

M. A.

Acar

(2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

21.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

22.

Soria

K. M.

Stebleton

M. J.

(2012). First-generation students’ academic engagement and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666735

23.

Stebleton

M. J.

Soria

K. M.

Huesman

R. L.

Jr Torres

(2014). Recent immigrant students at research universities: The relationship between campus climate and sense of belonging. Journal of College Student Development, 55(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0019

24.

Strayhorn

T. L.

(2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315297293

25.

Terry

Hayfield

(2021). Essentials of thematic analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000238-000

26.

Waalkes

P. L.

Gonzalez

L. M.

Brunson

C. N.

(2019). Vision boards and adolescent career counseling: A culturally responsive approach. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 14(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2019.1602092

27.

Walton

G. M.

Cohen

G. L.

(2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364

28.

Young

K. E.

Young

C. H.

Beyer

(2017). Does the classroom matter? How the physical space affects learning in introductory undergraduate science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_06_80

29.

Yust

P. K.

Liu

Hard

B. M.

(2021). Course belonging and engagement in introductory psychology: Why they matter and what predicts them. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 7(3), 206. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000295