Residential Ground Coupled Heat Pump systems are usually characterised by an ON/OFF behaviour of the heat pump with typical cycling frequencies of 1—4 cycles per hour. The ground loop fluid pump has the same ON/OFF behaviour and the borehole heat exchanger operates either in full flow or no flow conditions. Typical hourly simulations of GCHP systems use steady-state models for the heat pump and the borehole fluid (transient models being used for buildings and heat transfer in the ground). This paper reviews the models used in typical hourly simulations as well as transient models that are available and compares the results obtained using the two classes of models within the TRNSYS simulation environment. Both the long-term energy performance and the optimum system design are compared. It is shown that using steady-state models leads to an overestimation of the energy use that ranges from a few percents with oversized borehole heat exchangers to 75% for undersized exchangers. A simple Life Cycle Cost analysis shows that using steady-state models can lead to selecting a very different design than the one that would have been selected using dynamic models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
NRCan-OEE.Heating and cooling with a heat pump. Ground Source heat pumps, pp. 24—42. Natural Resources Canada, Office for Energy Efficiency, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2004.
2.
Klein SA, Beckman WA, Mitchell JW, Duffie JA, Duffie NA, Freeman TL, Mitchell JC, Braun JE, Evans BL, Kummer JP, Urban RE, Fiksel A., Thornton JW, Blair NJ, Williams PM, Bradley DE, McDowell TP, Kummert M.TRNSYS 16 — A TRaNsient SYstem Simulation program, User manual . Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison , 2004.
3.
Ashrae.Standard 116-1983, Methods of testing seasonal efficiency of unitary air-conditioners and heatpumps . American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, Atlanta, 1983.
4.
Henderson H. , Huang YJ, Parker D.Residential equipment part load curves for use in DOE-2, Technical report LBNL-42175, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999.
5.
MacArthur JW , Grald EWPrediction of cyclic heat pump performance with a fully developed model and a comparison with experimental data. ASHRAE Transactions1987; 93: 1159—72.
6.
Goldschmidt VW, Hart GH, Reiner RCA note on the degradation coefficient of a field tested heat pump-cooling and heating mode. ASHRAE Transactions1980; 86: 368—75.
7.
Mulroy WJ, Didion DARefrigerant migration in a split-unit air conditioner. ASHRAE Transactions1985; 91: 193—206.
8.
Afjei T., Wetter M.TRNSYS Type: Compressor heat pump including frost and cycle losses Version 1.1 — Model description and implementing into TRNSYS, Transsolar GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, 1997.
9.
Henderson HI, Rengarajan K.Model to predict the latent capacity of air conditioners and heat pumps at part-load conditions with constant fan operation. ASHRAE Transactions1996; 102: 266—74.
10.
Katipamula S. , O'Neal DL. Performance degradation during on-off cycling of single-speed air conditioners and heat pumps: experimental results . ASHRAE Transactions1991; 97: 331—39.
11.
NRCan.GS2000 — Heat Exchanger Design Program, Version 2.0c. Natural Resources Canada, CANMET Technology Centre, Buildings Group, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1998.
12.
SEL.TRNSYS 16 — A Transient System Simulation Program — Documentation set (9 Volumes). Version 16.00.0038 . Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI. http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys , 2005.
13.
Uiuc and Lbnl.EnergyPlus Engineering Reference: The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations, U.S. Department of Energy, 2006.
14.
Yavuzturk C. , Spitler JDA short time step response factor model for vertical ground loop heat exchangers. ASHRAE Transactions1999; 105: 475—85.
15.
Hellström G.Duct Ground Heat Storage Model, Manual for Computer Code, Department of Mathematical Physics, University of Lund, Sweden, 1989.
16.
Young TR, Development, verification, and design analysis of the borehole fluid thermal mass model for approximating short term borehole thermal response . Master's thesis Oklahoma State University, Building and Environmental Thermal Systems Research Group, 2004.
17.
Wetter M., Huber A.TRNSYS Type 451: Vertical Borehole Heat Exchanger EWS Model, Version 3.1 - Model description and implementing into TRNSYS, Transsolar GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, 1997.
18.
Tess.TESS Libraries Version 2.02, Reference Manuals (13 Volumes). Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, Madison, WI. http://tessinc.com, 2005.
19.
Henderson HISimulating combined thermostat, air conditioner, and building performance in a house. ASHRAE Transactions1992; 98: 370—380.
Hamlin T., Gusdorf J.Air tightness and energy efficiency of new conventional and R-2000 housing in Canada, 1997. Natural Resources Canada, CANMET - Buildings Group, 1997.
22.
Numerical Logics.Canadian Weather for Energy Calculations, Users Manual and CD-ROM. Ottawa: Environment Canada, 1999 .
23.
ClimateMaster.Engineering Design Guide: Tranquility 20TM single-stage (TS) series 1,4 to 6 ton horizontal and vertical earthpureTM units, p. 20 (Performance Data TS 018, ECM Motor), 2006.
24.
Ashrae.Handbook — Fundamentals. Chapter 27, Ventilation and Infiltration, p. 27.22. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2005, Atlanta, GA, USA.
25.
Walker I., Wilson D.Field validation of algebraic equations for stack and wind driven air infiltration calculations, HVAC&R Research1998; 4: 119—139.
26.
Manning MM, Swinton MC, Szadkowski F., Gusdorf J., Ruest K.The effects of thermostat setting on seasonal energy consumption at the CCHT research facility (RR-191), Technical report, Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2005.
