The Education of the Handicapped Act stipulates that testing should be conducted in the mode in which students usually communicate. This study investigated the instructional validity of criterion-referenced tests in 30 states to determine which of the recommended instructional modes the states allowed to be translated into testing practice for students who are visually impaired. Although few modifications to the tests were universally accepted, testing directors seem amenable to reasoned change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BendersonA. (1988). Testing, equality, and handicapped people.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 303–944)
2.
BennettR.E., & RagostaM. (1984). A research context for studying admissions tests and handicapped populations (Report No. 1). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
BennettR.E., RagostaM., & StrickerL.J. (1984). The test performance of handicapped people (Report No. 2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
BennettR.E., RockD.A., & JireleT. (1986). The psychometric characteristics of the GRE general test for three handicapped groups (Report No. 6). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Graduate Record Examination Board Program (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301 571)
5.
BennettR.E., RockD.A., & KaplanB.A. (1987). SAT differential item performance for nine handicapped groups.Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(1), 41–55.
6.
BennettR.E., RockD.A., & NovatkoskiI. (1989). Differential item functioning on the SAT-M braille edition.Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 67–79.
FuchsD., FuchsL.S., BenowitzS., & Bar-ringerK. (1987). Norm-referenced tests: Are they valid for use with handicapped students?Exceptional Children, 54, 263–271.
9.
HaringN.G., & McCormickL. (Eds.). (1990). Exceptional children and youth (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
10.
HeywardW.L., & OrlanskyM.D. (1992). Exceptional children: An introductory survey of special education (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
11.
MeyenE.L., & SkrticT.M. (Eds.). (1988). Exceptional children and youth: An introduction (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
12.
PophamJ.W. (1981). Modern educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
PullinD., & ZirkelP.A. (1987). Testing the handicapped: Legislation, regulations and litigation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 295 334)
14.
RothsteinL.F. (1990). Special education law.White Plains, NY: Longman.
15.
ShermanS.W., & RobinsonN.M. (Eds.). (1982). Ability testing of handicapped people: Dilemma for government, science and the public.Washington, DC: Office of Civil Rights (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 221 560)
16.
SmithD.D., & LuckassonR. (1992). Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of challenge.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
