The Scope of Practice of Diabetes Educators in the State of Georgia

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the scope of practice trends of diabetes educators in the state of Georgia.

METHODS

The Diabetes Educator Responsibilities Questionnaire (DERQ) was sent to 221 members of the American Association of Diabetes Educators listed in the 1995 membership directory in Georgia. Of the 221 members, 97 returned completed questionnaires. This population of healthcare professionals comprised the sample population.

RESULTS

In assessing the primary responsibilities of the sample, more than 50% of the respondents performed six of the nine educator roles. Less than 50% of the respondents indicated that they "Always" or "Frequently" used behavior modification strategies in teaching people with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire used in this study should be expanded to elicit more detailed information regarding decisions to use or not use behavior modification techniques in diabetes education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. American Association of Diabetes Educators Task Force . The scope of practice for diabetes educators and the standards of practice for diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ. 1992;18(1):52-56.

2. Ezzard N , Deeb L , Alogna M , Gettinger J . Profiles of diabetes education in 1979; results of three surveys. Diabetes Educ 1980;6(2):11-15.

3. Essig M , Thielen P . A study of diabetes educators in Ohio hospitals. Diabetes Educ. 1982;8(2):33-35.

4. Cypress M , Wylie-Rosett J , Engel S , et al. The scope of practice of diabetes educators in a metropolitan area. Diabetes Educ. 1992;18(2):111-114.

5. Ruby K , Blainey C , Haas L , Patrick M . The knowledge and practices of registered nurse, certified diabetes educators: teaching elderly clients about exercise. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19(4):299-306.

6. Thompson A , Gibbon C . Setting standards in diabetes education. Nurs Stand. 1993;14(7):25-28.

7. Kish L . Economic design of surveys. In: Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1965:254-297.

8. Bernhaum M , Albert S , Brusca S , et al. A model clinical program for patients with diabetes and vision impairment. Diabetes Educ. 1989;15(4):325-330.

9. Brown S . Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research. Variations in intervention effects across studies. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:409-419.

10.

10. Pedersen A , Lowry K . A regional diabetes nutrition education program: its effect on knowledge and eating behavior. Diabetes Educ. 1992;18(5):416-419.

11.

11. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulindependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.

12.

12. Dobson J , Nord W , Haire-Joshua D . The use of goal setting by physicians in the treatment of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1989;15(1):62-65.

13.

13. Wilson M , Boyer C . A contract for change in diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ. 1988;14(1):37-40.

14.

14. Polit D , Hungler D . Research control. In: Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1995:209-227.

15.

15. Derstine J . Planning for career flexibility. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1995;18(6):215-218.

16.

16. Pender N . A proposed model for health-promoting behavior. In: Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1987:57-72.

17.

17. Weitzel M . A test of the health promotion model with blue collar workers. Nurs Res. 1989;38(2):99-104.

18.

18. Graham C . Exercise and aging: implications for persons with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1991;17(3):189-195.

19.

19. Jayne R , Rankin S . Revisiting nurse knowledge about diabetes: an update and implications for practice. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19(6):497-502.