This experimental study investigated approach behavior toward opposite-sex others of similar versus dissimilar physical attractiveness. Furthermore, it tested the moderating effects of sex. Single participants interacted with confederates of high and low attractiveness. Observers rated their behavior in terms of relational investment (i.e., behavioral efforts related to the improvement of interaction fluency, communication of positive interpersonal affect, and positive self-presentation). As expected, men displayed more relational investment behavior if their own physical attractiveness was similar to that of the confederate. For women, no effects of attractiveness similarity on relational investment behavior were found. Results are discussed in the light of positive assortative mating, preferences for physically attractive mates, and sex differences in attraction-related interpersonal behaviors.
Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Holland, R.W. (2007). The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuit: When goals and negative affect are coactivated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 165-178.
2.
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
3.
Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
4.
Baumeister, R.F., & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.
5.
Bayes, M.A. (1972). Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 333-339.
6.
Berry, D.S., & Miller, K.M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77.
7.
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173-189.
8.
Berry, D.S., & Miller, K.M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77.
9.
Bot, S.M., Engels, R.C.M.E., & Knibbe, R.A. (2005). The effects of alcohol expectancies on drinking behaviour in peer groups: Observations in a naturalistic setting. Addiction, 100, 1270-1279.
10.
Botwin, M.D., Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136.
11.
Brislin, R.W., & Lewis, S.A. (1968). Dating and physical attractiveness: Replication . Psychological Reports, 22, 976.
12.
Burley, N. (1983). The meaning of assortative mating. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 191-203.
13.
Cavior, N., & Boblett, P.J. (1972). The physical attractiveness of dating vs. married couples. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 175-176.
14.
Chambers, V.J., Christiansen, J.R., & Kunz, P.R. (1983). Physiognomic homogamy: A test of physical similarity as a factor in mate selection process. Social Biology, 30, 151-157.
15.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224.
16.
Clark, C.L., Shaver, P.R., & Abrahams, M.F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 707-720.
17.
Curran, J.P., & Lippold, S. (1975). The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads. Journal of Personality , 43, 528-539.
18.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1-40). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
19.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
20.
Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
21.
Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., & Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
22.
Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235.
23.
Feng, D., & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality, and psychological well-being. Behavioral Genetics, 24, 357-364.
24.
Folkes, V.S. (1982). Forming relationships and the matching hypothesis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 631-636.
25.
Frieze, I.H., Olson, J.E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1039-1057.
26.
Gonzaga, G.C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E.A., & Smith, M.D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 247-262.
27.
Gonzaga, G.C., Turner, R.A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships . Emotion, 6, 163-179.
Grammer, K. (1990). Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 209-236.
30.
Grammer, K., Honda, M., Juette, A., & Schmitt, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 487-508.
31.
Grammer, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A., & Fink, B. (2000). Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 371-390.
32.
Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81-91.
33.
Henningsen, D.D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50, 481-489.
34.
Huston, T.L. (1973). Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 9, 32-42.
35.
Johnstone, R.A. (1997). The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 51-59.
36.
Kalick, S.M., & Hamilton, T.E. (1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 673-682.
37.
Karremans, J.C., & Verwijmeren, T. (2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939-950.
38.
Keller, M.C., Thiessen, D., & Young, R.K. (1996). Mate assortment in dating and married couples . Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 217-221.
39.
Kiesler, S.B., & Baral, R.L. (1970). The search for a romantic partner: The effects of self-esteem and physical attractiveness on romantic behavior. In K. J. Gergen & D. Marlowe (Eds.), Personality and social behavior (pp. 155-378). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
41.
Levesque, M.J., Nave, C.S., & Lowe, C.A. (2006). Toward an understanding of gender differences in inferring sexual interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 30, 150-158.
42.
Li, N.P., Bailey, J.M., Kenrick, D.T., & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
Maner, J.K., Rouby, D.A., & Gonzaga, G.C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 343-349.
45.
Matthews, L.S., Wickrama, K.A.S., & Conger, R.D. (1996). Predicting marital instability from spouse and observer reports of marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 641-655.
46.
McAdams, D.P., Jackson, R.J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality , 52, 261-273.
47.
McKillip, J., & Reidel, S.L. (1983). External validity of matching on physical attractiveness for same and opposite sex couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 328-337.
48.
Mehrabian, A. (1966). Immediacy: An indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34, 26-34.
49.
Moore, M.M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237-247.
50.
Mottet, T.P., & Richmond, V.P. (1998). An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: Alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46, 25-40.
51.
Murstein, B.I. (1972). Physical attractiveness and marital choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 8-12.
52.
Price, R.A., & Vandenberg, S.G. (1979). Matching for physical attractiveness in married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 5, 398-400.
53.
Reis, H.T., Clark, M.S., & Holmes, J.G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In A. P. Aron & D. J. Mashek (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
55.
Stroebe, W., Insko, C.A., Thompson, V.D., & Layton, B.D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.
56.
Takeuchi, S.A. (2006). On the matching phenomenon in courtship: A probability matching theory of mate selection. Marriage and Family Review , 40, 25-51.
57.
Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology & Sociobiology, 1, 111-140.
58.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates . Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285-293.
59.
Todd, P.M. (1997). Searching for the next best mate. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann , & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 419-436). Berlin: Springer.
60.
Todd, P.M., & Miller, G.F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287-308). New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
62.
Vandenberg, S.G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2, 127-157.
63.
Van Straaten, I., Engels, R.C.M.E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R.W. (2008). Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: A semi-naturalistic experiment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 902-911.
64.
Van Straaten, I., Holland, R.W., Finkenauer, C., Hollenstein, T., & Engels, R.C.M.E. (in press). Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: Sex and attractiveness effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior. March 5, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9482-x
65.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
66.
Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2007). Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 79-88.
67.
White, G.L. (1980). Physical attractiveness and courtship progress . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 660-668.
