Four studies investigate whether decisions for others produce more creative solutions than do decisions for the self and if construal level explains this relation. In Study 1, participants carried out a structured imagination task by drawing an alien for a story that they would write, or alternatively for a story that someone else would write. As expected, drawing an alien for someone else produced a more creative alien. In Studies 2a and 2b, construal level (i.e., psychological distance) was independently manipulated. Participants generated more creative ideas on behalf of distant others than on behalf of either close others or themselves. Finally, in Study 3, a classic insight problem was investigated. Participants deciding for others were more likely to solve the problem; furthermore, this result was mediated by psychological distance. These findings demonstrate that people are more creative for others than for themselves and shed light on differences in self—other decision making.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 48, 393-399.
2.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
3.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity." Boulder, CO: Westview .
4.
Amabile, T.M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A., & Tighe, E.M. ( 1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950-967.
5.
Batson, C.D. ( 1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
Batson, C.D. ( 1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 282-316). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Brief, A.P., & Aldag, R.J. ( 1977). The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 2, 496-500.
8.
Broemer, P., Grabowski, A., Gebauer, J.E., Ermel, O., & Diehl, M. ( 2008). How temporal distance from past selves influences self-perception . European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 697-714.
9.
Casarett, D., & Ross, L.F. ( 1997). Overriding a patient’s refusal of treatment after an iatrogenic complication. New England Journal of Medicine , 336, 1908-1910.
10.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. ( 1997). Finding flow. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. ( 1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 497-509.
12.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. ( 2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 135-146.
13.
Epley, N., & Dunning, D. ( 2000). Feeling "holier than thou": Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861-875.
14.
Finke, R.A. ( 1995). Creative insight and preinventive forms. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 255-280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Förster, J., Friedman, R.S., & Liberman, N. ( 2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
16.
Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492.
17.
Galinsky, A.D., Maddux, W.W., Gilin, D., & White, J.B. ( 2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations . Psychological Science, 19, 378-384.
18.
Galinsky, A.D., Magee, J.C., Inesi, M.E., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
19.
Grant, A.M. ( 2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393-417.
20.
Grant, A.M. ( 2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48-58.
21.
Gunia, B.C., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A.D. (2009). Vicarious entrapment: Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1238-1244.
22.
Heath, C. ( 1999). On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic rewards. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 25-62.
23.
Hsee, C.K., & Weber, E.U. ( 1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-others discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General , 126, 45-53.
24.
Isen, A.M., Daubman, K.A., & Nowicki, G.P. ( 1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem-solving . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
25.
Jia, L., Hirt, E.R., & Karpen, S.C. ( 2009). Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 45, 1127-1131.
26.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. ( 2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone else’s place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 977-990.
27.
Kray, L.J. ( 2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106.
28.
Leung, A.K.-Y., & Chiu, C-Y. ( 2010). Multicultural experiences, idea receptiveness, and creativity . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 1-19.
29.
Leung, A.K.Y., Maddux, W.W., Galinsky, A.D., & Chiu, C.Y. ( 2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181.
30.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
31.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
32.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. ( 2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353-383). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.
34.
Loewenstein, G. ( 2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24, S49-S56.
35.
Markman, K.D., Lindberg, M.J., Kray, L.J., & Galinsky, A.D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 312-324.
36.
Miller, D.T., Downs, J.S., & Prentice, D.A. (1998). Minimal conditions for the creation of a unit relationship: The social bond between birthdaymates . European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 475-481.
37.
Miller, D.T., & McFarland, C. ( 1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 298-305.
38.
Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. ( 2003). Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497.
39.
Payne, J.W. ( 1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387.
40.
Polman, E. ( 2010). Information distortion in self-other decision making . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 432-435.
41.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
42.
Pronin, E., Olivola, C.Y., & Kennedy, K.A. ( 2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224-236.
43.
Pronin, E., & Ross, L. ( 2006). Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: When the self is seen as an other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 197-209.
44.
Quinn, R.W. ( 2005). Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 610-641.
45.
Redelmeier, D.A., & Tversky, A. ( 1990). The discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. New England Journal of Medicine, 322, 1162-1164.
46.
Restle, F. ( 1962). Speed and accuracy of cognitive achievement in small groups. In J. H. Criswell, H. Solomon, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical models in small group processes (pp. 250-262). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
Ross, L. ( 1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 174-221). New York, NY: Academic Press.
48.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. ( 2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist , 55, 68-78.
49.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L.R. (1996). Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61-77.
50.
Schooler, J.W., Fiore, S.M., & Brandimonte, M.A. (1997). At a loss from words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37, 291-340.
51.
Shelton, J.N., & Richeson, J.A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 88, 91-107.
52.
Simon, H. ( 2001). Learning to research about learning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 205-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
53.
Simonson, I. ( 1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 1-14.
54.
Stone, E.R., Yates, A.J., & Caruthers, A.S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1797-1824.
Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 66-76.
57.
Vorauer, J.D., & Ratner, R.K. ( 1996). Who’s going to make the first move? Pluralistic ignorance as an impediment to relationship formation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 483-506.
58.
Wakslak, C.J., Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 2008). Representations of the self in the near and distant future . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 757-773.
59.
Ward, T.B. ( 1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
60.
Ward, T.B. ( 1995). What’s old about new ideas?. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 157-178). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
61.
Ward, T.B., Finke, R.A., & Smith, S.M. ( 1995). Creativity and the mind: Discovering the genius within . New York, NY: Plenum.
62.
Ward, T.B., Patterson, M.J., Sifonis, C.M., Dodds, R.A., Saunders, K.N. ( 2002). The role of graded category structure in imaginative thought. Memory & Cognition, 30, 199-216.
63.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
64.
Wilson, T.D., & Gilbert, D.T. ( 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131-134.
65.
Wray, L.D., & Stone, E.R. ( 2005). The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 125-144.
Zikmund-Fisher, B.J., Sarr, B., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P.A. ( 2006). A matter of perspective: Choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 618-622.
